These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10561649)

  • 1. Effect of fetal presentation on the amniotic fluid index.
    Brost BC; Scardo JA; Newman RB; Van Dorsten JP
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 181(5 Pt 1):1222-4. PubMed ID: 10561649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Ultrasonographic evaluation of myometrial thickness and prediction of a successful external cephalic version.
    Buhimschi CS; Buhimschi IA; Wehrum MJ; Molaskey-Jones S; Sfakianaki AK; Pettker CM; Thung S; Campbell KH; Dulay AT; Funai EF; Bahtiyar MO
    Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Oct; 118(4):913-20. PubMed ID: 21934456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Predictors for a successful external cephalic version: a single centre experience.
    Ebner F; Friedl TW; Leinert E; Schramm A; Reister F; Lato K; Janni W; DeGregorio N
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2016 Apr; 293(4):749-55. PubMed ID: 26437955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [External cephalic version of breech fetus after 36 weeks of gestation - evaluation of efectiveness and complications].
    Hruban L; Janků P; Jordánová K; Gerychová R; Huser M; Ventruba P; Roztočil A
    Ceska Gynekol; 2017; 82(6):443-449. PubMed ID: 29302977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External cephalic version with salbutamol - success rate and predictors of success.
    Tasnim N; Mahmud G; Khurshid M
    J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2009 Feb; 19(2):91-4. PubMed ID: 19208311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A prospective study of the factors associated with the success rate of external cephalic version for breech presentation at term.
    Burgos J; Melchor JC; Pijoán JI; Cobos P; Fernández-Llebrez L; Martínez-Astorquiza T
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2011 Jan; 112(1):48-51. PubMed ID: 20870233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Introducing external cephalic version at 36 weeks or more in a district general hospital: a review and an audit.
    Healey M; Porter R; Galimberti A
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1997 Sep; 104(9):1073-9. PubMed ID: 9307538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Does the use of a tocolytic agent affect the success rate of external cephalic version?
    Marquette GP; Boucher M; Thériault D; Rinfret D
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1996 Oct; 175(4 Pt 1):859-61. PubMed ID: 8885736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. External cephalic version: predictors of success.
    Aisenbrey GA; Catanzarite VA; Nelson C
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Nov; 94(5 Pt 1):783-6. PubMed ID: 10546729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The effect of spinal anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: a randomized trial.
    Dugoff L; Stamm CA; Jones OW; Mohling SI; Hawkins JL
    Obstet Gynecol; 1999 Mar; 93(3):345-9. PubMed ID: 10074976
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Amnioinfusion to facilitate external cephalic version after initial failure.
    Adama van Scheltema PN; Feitsma AH; Middeldorp JM; Vandenbussche FP; Oepkes D
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Sep; 108(3 Pt 1):591-2. PubMed ID: 16946219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Mode of childbirth and neonatal outcome after external cephalic version: A prospective cohort study.
    Rosman AN; Vlemmix F; Ensing S; Opmeer BC; Te Hoven S; Velzel J; de Hundt M; van den Berg S; Rota H; van der Post JA; Mol BW; Kok M
    Midwifery; 2016 Aug; 39():44-8. PubMed ID: 27321719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. External cephalic version among women with a previous cesarean delivery: report on 36 cases and review of the literature.
    Abenhaim HA; Varin J; Boucher M
    J Perinat Med; 2009; 37(2):156-60. PubMed ID: 19021458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [External version in the breech presentation: a review of the literature and our experience].
    Periti E; Nannini R
    Minerva Ginecol; 1995; 47(1-2):9-15. PubMed ID: 7770152
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Finding the breech: Influence of breech presentation on mode of delivery based on timing of diagnosis, attempt at external cephalic version, and provider success with version.
    Andrews S; Leeman L; Yonke N
    Birth; 2017 Sep; 44(3):222-229. PubMed ID: 28481464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The relationship between amniotic fluid index and successful external cephalic version: a 14-year experience.
    Boucher M; Bujold E; Marquette GP; Vezina Y
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Sep; 189(3):751-4. PubMed ID: 14526307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prediction of Success in External Cephalic Version for Breech Presentation at Term.
    Isakov O; Reicher L; Lavie A; Yogev Y; Maslovitz S
    Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 133(5):857-866. PubMed ID: 30969207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Maternal and fetal factors affecting success of antepartum external cephalic version.
    Ferguson JE; Armstrong MA; Dyson DC
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Nov; 70(5):722-5. PubMed ID: 3658279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [External cephalic version for breech presentation at term: an effective procedure to reduce the caesarean section rate].
    Lojacono A; Donarini G; Valcamonico A; Soregaroli M; Frusca T
    Minerva Ginecol; 2003 Dec; 55(6):519-24. PubMed ID: 14676741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Prognostic parameters for successful external cephalic version.
    Ben-Meir A; Erez Y; Sela HY; Shveiky D; Tsafrir A; Ezra Y
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2008 Sep; 21(9):660-2. PubMed ID: 18828059
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.