These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10562474)

  • 1. Using administrative data to assess health care outcomes.
    Ayanian JZ
    Eur Heart J; 1999 Dec; 20(23):1689-91. PubMed ID: 10562474
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stents or surgery? New data on the comparative outcomes of percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass graft surgery.
    Hlatky MA; Bravata DM
    Circulation; 2008 Jul; 118(4):325-7. PubMed ID: 18645064
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Do operator volumes relate to clinical outcomes after percutaneous coronary intervention in the Canadian health care system?
    Cantor WJ; Hall R; Tu JV
    Am Heart J; 2006 Apr; 151(4):902-8. PubMed ID: 16569560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Quality of care in myocardial revascularization procedures.
    Eldar R
    Croat Med J; 2002 Dec; 43(6):727-30. PubMed ID: 12476484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Taking the measure of clinical care.
    O'Connor GT
    Can J Cardiol; 2003 Jun; 19(7):771-3. PubMed ID: 12813609
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cross-provincial use of cardiac services: the importance of data-sharing for clinical registries and outcomes research.
    Humphries KH; Carere RG; Izadnegahdar M; Galbraith PD; Knudtson ML; Ghali WA
    Can J Cardiol; 2005 Mar; 21(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 15776116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cardiac revascularization in specialty and general hospitals.
    Edwards FH; Welke KF; Levitsky S
    N Engl J Med; 2005 Jun; 352(26):2754-6; author reply 2754-6. PubMed ID: 15991357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Public reporting of quality measures what are we trying to accomplish?
    Califf RM; Peterson ED
    J Am Coll Cardiol; 2009 Mar; 53(10):831-3. PubMed ID: 19264237
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Bridging American-Canadian health care outcome differences: is there really a gap?
    Chang WC; Armstrong PW
    Can J Cardiol; 2004 Nov; 20(13):1341-2. PubMed ID: 15565198
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term safety and efficacy of percutaneous coronary intervention with stenting and coronary artery bypass surgery for multivessel coronary artery disease: a meta-analysis with 5-year patient-level data from the ARTS, ERACI-II, MASS-II, and SoS trials.
    Daemen J; Boersma E; Flather M; Booth J; Stables R; Rodriguez A; Rodriguez-Granillo G; Hueb WA; Lemos PA; Serruys PW
    Circulation; 2008 Sep; 118(11):1146-54. PubMed ID: 18725490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomized studies of coronary artery bypass grafting vs. medical or percutaneous catheter-based revascularization: a review.
    Shemin RJ
    Adv Card Surg; 1999; 11():1-34. PubMed ID: 10575485
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Top performers in heart surgery.
    Mathias JM
    OR Manager; 1999 Jul; 15(7):24-5, 27. PubMed ID: 10539070
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. One-year outcomes of coronary artery bypass graft surgery versus percutaneous coronary intervention with multiple stenting for multisystem disease: a meta-analysis of individual patient data from randomized clinical trials.
    Mercado N; Wijns W; Serruys PW; Sigwart U; Flather MD; Stables RH; O'Neill WW; Rodriguez A; Lemos PA; Hueb WA; Gersh BJ; Booth J; Boersma E
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Aug; 130(2):512-9. PubMed ID: 16077421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Outcomes in cardiology research: how much are we willing to compromise?
    Shaw RE
    J Invasive Cardiol; 1993; 5(1):23-7. PubMed ID: 10148298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Current percutaneous coronary intervention and coronary artery bypass grafting practices for three-vessel and left main coronary artery disease. Insights from the SYNTAX run-in phase.
    Kappetein AP; Dawkins KD; Mohr FW; Morice MC; Mack MJ; Russell ME; Pomar J; Serruys PW
    Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2006 Apr; 29(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 16497510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Left main coronary artery disease: is CABG still the gold standard?
    Ng MK; Yeung AC
    Rev Cardiovasc Med; 2005; 6(4):187-93. PubMed ID: 16379014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Design of the 'Stent or Surgery' trial (SoS): a randomized controlled trial to compare coronary artery bypass grafting with percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty and primary stent implantation in patients with multi-vessel coronary artery disease.
    Stables RH
    Semin Interv Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 4(4):201-7. PubMed ID: 10738353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Overview of systematic reviews on invasive treatment of stable coronary artery disease.
    Kuukasjärvi P; Malmivaara A; Halinen M; Hartikainen J; Keto PE; Talvensaari T; Tierala I; Mäkelä M
    Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2006; 22(2):219-34. PubMed ID: 16571198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Trials of angioplasty and surgery: CABRI.
    Kurbaan AS; Bowker TJ; Rickards AF
    Semin Interv Cardiol; 1999 Dec; 4(4):179-84. PubMed ID: 10738350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Patients enrolled in coronary intervention trials are not representative of patients in clinical practice: results from the Euro Heart Survey on Coronary Revascularization.
    Hordijk-Trion M; Lenzen M; Wijns W; de Jaegere P; Simoons ML; Scholte op Reimer WJ; Bertrand ME; Mercado N; Boersma E;
    Eur Heart J; 2006 Mar; 27(6):671-8. PubMed ID: 16423872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.