173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10562790)
1. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Laryngeal mask airway size selection in males and females: ease of insertion, oropharyngeal leak pressure, pharyngeal mucosal pressures and anatomical position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Br J Anaesth; 1999 May; 82(5):703-7. PubMed ID: 10536546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Pühringer F
Anesthesiology; 1999 Dec; 91(6):1661-5. PubMed ID: 10598608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures, airway sealing pressures, and fiberoptic position with the intubating versus the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesthesiology; 1999 Apr; 90(4):1001-6. PubMed ID: 10201670
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Sep; 83(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 10655926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1064-6. PubMed ID: 10566928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe JR; Brimacombe JC; Berry AM; Morris R; Mecklem D; Clarke G; Barry J; Kirk T
Anesth Analg; 1998 Jul; 87(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 9661564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparative evaluation of the prolonged use of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized patients.
Voyagis GS; Dimitriou VK; Kyriakis KP
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1999 Jun; 16(6):371-5. PubMed ID: 10434164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during manually controlled positive pressure ventilation.
Heringlake M; Doerges V; Ocker H; Schmucker P
J Clin Anesth; 1999 Nov; 11(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 10624645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and cuff position with the flexible and the standard laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):913-6. PubMed ID: 10195547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices.
Ulrich-Pur H; Hrska F; Krafft P; Friehs H; Wulkersdorfer B; Köstler WJ; Rabitsch W; Staudinger T; Schuster E; Frass M
Anesthesiology; 2006 May; 104(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 16645443
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Calculated vs measured pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway during cuff inflation: assessment of four locations.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Benzer A
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Mar; 82(3):399-401. PubMed ID: 10434824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway in spontaneous breathing anesthesia.
Hsu YW; Pan MH; Huang CJ; Cheng CR; Wu KH; Wei TT; Chen CT
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1998 Dec; 36(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 10399513
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Boehler M; Loeckinger A; Puehringer F
Anesthesiology; 2002 May; 96(5):1074-7. PubMed ID: 11981145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
