BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

130 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10562811)

  • 1. Oesophageal and gastric cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
    Burroughs SH; Biffin AH; Pye JK; Williams GT
    J Clin Pathol; 1999 Jun; 52(6):435-9. PubMed ID: 10562811
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Colorectal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit.
    Bull AD; Biffin AH; Mella J; Radcliffe AG; Stamatakis JD; Steele RJ; Williams GT
    J Clin Pathol; 1997 Feb; 50(2):138-42. PubMed ID: 9155695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Upper gastrointestinal cancer pathology reporting: a regional audit to compare standards with minimum datasets.
    King PM; Blazeby JM; Gupta J; Alderson D; Moorghen M
    J Clin Pathol; 2004 Jul; 57(7):702-5. PubMed ID: 15220361
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Completeness of low anterior resection pathology report: a hospital-based audit with recommendations on improving reporting.
    Nambiar A; Vivek N; Bindu MR; Sudheer OV; Bai L
    Indian J Cancer; 2010; 47(2):156-9. PubMed ID: 20448379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quality and completeness of histopathology reports of rectal cancer resections. Results of an audit in Brittany.
    Eon Y; Le Douy JY; Lamer B; Battini J; Bretagne JF
    Gastroenterol Clin Biol; 2006 Feb; 30(2):235-40. PubMed ID: 16565656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. An audit of breast cancer pathology reporting in Australia in 1995.
    Kricker A; Armstrong B; Smith C; Bilous M; Camaris C; Mayer A; Psarianos T
    Br J Cancer; 1999 May; 80(3-4):563-8. PubMed ID: 10408867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A survey of reporting of colorectal cancer in Scotland: compliance with guidelines and effect of proforma reporting.
    Woods YL; Mukhtar S; McClements P; Lang J; Steele RJ; Carey FA
    J Clin Pathol; 2014 Jun; 67(6):499-505. PubMed ID: 24567415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Histopathology reporting in colorectal cancer: a proforma improves quality.
    Siriwardana PN; Pathmeswaran A; Hewavisenthi J; Deen KI
    Colorectal Dis; 2009 Oct; 11(8):849-53. PubMed ID: 19740157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evidence of effectiveness of clinical audit in improving histopathology reporting standards of mastectomy specimens.
    Appleton MA; Douglas-Jones AG; Morgan JM
    J Clin Pathol; 1998 Jan; 51(1):30-3. PubMed ID: 9577368
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ex vivo dissection increases lymph node yield in oesophagogastric cancer.
    Cichowitz A; Burton P; Brown W; Smith A; Shaw K; Slamowicz R; Nottle PD
    ANZ J Surg; 2015 Jan; 85(1-2):80-4. PubMed ID: 23980803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Template reporting matters--a nationwide study on histopathology reporting on colorectal carcinoma resections.
    Haugland HK; Casati B; Dørum LM; Bjugn R
    Hum Pathol; 2011 Jan; 42(1):36-40. PubMed ID: 20869747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Audit of histopathology reports for breast cancer in Aminu Kano Teaching Hospital.
    Atanda AT; Atanda JO
    West Afr J Med; 2010; 29(3):174-7. PubMed ID: 20665461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Pathology reporting of rectal cancer: a national audit.
    Keating J; Lolohea S; Kenwright D
    N Z Med J; 2003 Jul; 116(1178):U514. PubMed ID: 12897882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The use of a proforma improves colorectal cancer pathology reporting.
    Rigby K; Brown SR; Lakin G; Balsitis M; Hosie KB
    Ann R Coll Surg Engl; 1999 Nov; 81(6):401-3. PubMed ID: 10655894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of a standard proforma in breast cancer reporting.
    Mathers ME; Shrimankar J; Scott DJ; Charlton FG; Griffith CD; Angus B
    J Clin Pathol; 2001 Oct; 54(10):809-11. PubMed ID: 11577136
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The impact of operative approach for oesophageal cancer on outcome: the transhiatal approach may influence circumferential margin involvement.
    Suttie SA; Nanthakumaran S; Mofidi R; Rapson T; Gilbert FJ; Thompson AM; Park KG
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2012 Feb; 38(2):157-65. PubMed ID: 22154884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An audit comparing the reporting of staging MRI scans for rectal cancer with the London Cancer Alliance (LCA) guidelines.
    Siddiqui MRS; Shanmuganandan AP; Rasheed S; Tekkis P; Brown G; Abulafi AM
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Nov; 43(11):2093-2104. PubMed ID: 28947340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Quality indicators for gastric cancer surgery: a survey of practicing pathologists in Ontario.
    Qureshi AP; Ottensmeyer CA; Mahar AL; Chetty R; Pollett A; Wright FC; Coburn NG
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2009 Jul; 16(7):1883-9. PubMed ID: 19421818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The effects of implementing synoptic pathology reporting in cancer diagnosis: a systematic review.
    Sluijter CE; van Lonkhuijzen LR; van Slooten HJ; Nagtegaal ID; Overbeek LI
    Virchows Arch; 2016 Jun; 468(6):639-49. PubMed ID: 27097810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The histological appearance of oesophageal adenocarcinoma--an analysis based on 215 resection specimens.
    Sarbia M
    Virchows Arch; 2006 May; 448(5):532-8. PubMed ID: 16498532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.