These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

176 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10563171)

  • 1. [Cost-effectiveness of mammography screening in Norway].
    Kåresen R; Bø JK; Haustveit S; Hervik A; Thoresen SO
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 1999 Oct; 119(24):3553-9. PubMed ID: 10563171
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer screening policies in developing countries: a cost-effectiveness analysis for India.
    Okonkwo QL; Draisma G; der Kinderen A; Brown ML; de Koning HJ
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2008 Sep; 100(18):1290-300. PubMed ID: 18780864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Economic considerations in breast cancer screening of older women.
    Brown ML
    J Gerontol; 1992 Nov; 47 Spec No():51-8. PubMed ID: 1430883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A model-based comparison of breast cancer screening strategies: mammograms and clinical breast examinations.
    Shen Y; Parmigiani G
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2005 Feb; 14(2):529-32. PubMed ID: 15734983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-effectiveness of the Norwegian breast cancer screening program.
    van Luijt PA; Heijnsdijk EA; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2017 Feb; 140(4):833-840. PubMed ID: 27861849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cost-effectiveness of mammography, MRI, and ultrasonography for breast cancer screening.
    Feig S
    Radiol Clin North Am; 2010 Sep; 48(5):879-91. PubMed ID: 20868891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness analysis of screening for lung cancer with low dose spiral CT (computed tomography) in the Australian setting.
    Manser R; Dalton A; Carter R; Byrnes G; Elwood M; Campbell DA
    Lung Cancer; 2005 May; 48(2):171-85. PubMed ID: 15829317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The costs of mammography screening in New Zealand: evidence from the pilot programmes.
    Menon A; Devlin NJ; Richardson AK
    N Z Med J; 1994 Dec; 107(991):501-3. PubMed ID: 7830979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Risk- and cost-benefit analyses of breast screening programs derived from absorbed dose measurements in The Netherlands.
    Zuur C; Broerse JJ
    Diagn Imaging Clin Med; 1985; 54(3-4):211-22. PubMed ID: 3928229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Counting the costs of mammography screening: first year results from the Sydney study.
    Gerard K; Salkeld G; Hall J
    Med J Aust; 1990 May; 152(9):466, 469-71. PubMed ID: 2381337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analyzing costs and benefits of mammography screening in the workplace.
    Eley JW
    AAOHN J; 1989 May; 37(5):171-7. PubMed ID: 2496692
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Mammography screening in Germany: how, when and why?].
    Bick U
    Rofo; 2006 Oct; 178(10):957-69. PubMed ID: 17021975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Mammographic screening does not reduce breast cancer mortality].
    Sjönell G; Ståhle L
    Lakartidningen; 1999 Feb; 96(8):904-5, 908-13. PubMed ID: 10089737
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Estimating personal costs incurred by a woman participating in mammography screening in the National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program.
    Ekwueme DU; Hall IJ; Richardson LC; Gardner JG; Royalty J; Thompson TD
    Cancer; 2008 Aug; 113(3):592-601. PubMed ID: 18536027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Health economics analysis of colorectal screening].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Dózsa C; Pál M; Sándor J; Palásti J; Betlehem J; Ember I
    Magy Onkol; 2004; 48(2):111-5. PubMed ID: 15351803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Economic approach to breast cancer screening in Belgium].
    Autier P; Grivegnée AR
    Rev Med Brux; 1995; 16(4):326-9. PubMed ID: 7481252
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening with contrast-enhanced MRI in high-risk women.
    Taneja C; Edelsberg J; Weycker D; Guo A; Oster G; Weinreb J
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2009 Mar; 6(3):171-9. PubMed ID: 19248993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost-effectiveness of extending cervical cancer screening intervals among women with prior normal pap tests.
    Kulasingam SL; Myers ER; Lawson HW; McConnell KJ; Kerlikowske K; Melnikow J; Washington AE; Sawaya GF
    Obstet Gynecol; 2006 Feb; 107(2 Pt 1):321-8. PubMed ID: 16449119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Mammography screening in Norway: results from the first screening round in four counties and cost-effectiveness of a modeled nationwide screening.
    Wang H; Kåresen R; Hervik A; Thoresen SO
    Cancer Causes Control; 2001 Jan; 12(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11227924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Health economics analysis of breast cancer screening].
    Boncz I; Sebestyén A; Gulácsi L; Pál M; Dózsa C
    Magy Onkol; 2003; 47(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 12975661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.