BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10564629)

  • 21. A randomized controlled trial of the impact of targeted and tailored interventions on colorectal cancer screening.
    Myers RE; Sifri R; Hyslop T; Rosenthal M; Vernon SW; Cocroft J; Wolf T; Andrel J; Wender R
    Cancer; 2007 Nov; 110(9):2083-91. PubMed ID: 17893869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Women's mammography experience and its impact on screening adherence.
    Tang TS; Patterson SK; Roubidoux MA; Duan L
    Psychooncology; 2009 Jul; 18(7):727-34. PubMed ID: 19035468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. A large population-based randomized controlled trial to increase attendance at screening for cervical cancer.
    Eaker S; Adami HO; Granath F; Wilander E; Sparén P
    Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev; 2004 Mar; 13(3):346-54. PubMed ID: 15006907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effectiveness of interventions to improve follow-up after abnormal cervical cancer screening.
    Yabroff KR; Kerner JF; Mandelblatt JS
    Prev Med; 2000 Oct; 31(4):429-39. PubMed ID: 11006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Does telephone contact with a physician's office staff improve mammogram screening rates?
    Bodiya A; Vorias D; Dickson HA
    Fam Med; 1999 May; 31(5):324-6. PubMed ID: 10407709
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Intervention to increase screening mammography among women 65 and older.
    Michielutte R; Sharp PC; Foley KL; Cunningham LE; Spangler JG; Paskett ED; Case LD
    Health Educ Res; 2005 Apr; 20(2):149-62. PubMed ID: 15254001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Personal contact from friends to increase mammography usage.
    Calle EE; Miracle-McMahill HL; Moss RE; Heath CW
    Am J Prev Med; 1994; 10(6):361-6. PubMed ID: 7880557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The effect of telephone versus print tailoring for mammography adherence.
    Champion V; Skinner CS; Hui S; Monahan P; Juliar B; Daggy J; Menon U
    Patient Educ Couns; 2007 Mar; 65(3):416-23. PubMed ID: 17196358
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Cost-effectiveness analysis of interventions to enhance mammography compliance using computer modeling (CAN*TROL).
    Wu JH; Fung MC; Chan W; Lairson DR
    Value Health; 2004; 7(2):175-85. PubMed ID: 15164807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Tailored messages, external barriers, and women's utilization of professional breast cancer screening over time.
    Lauver DR; Settersten L; Kane JH; Henriques JB
    Cancer; 2003 Jun; 97(11):2724-35. PubMed ID: 12767084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Automated messaging to improve compliance with diabetes test monitoring.
    Derose SF; Nakahiro RK; Ziel FH
    Am J Manag Care; 2009 Jul; 15(7):425-31. PubMed ID: 19589010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Office systems for promoting screening mammography. A survey of primary care practices.
    Melville SK; Luckmann R; Coghlin J; Gann P
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Dec; 37(6):569-74. PubMed ID: 8245808
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Mammography interventions for 65- to 74-year-old HMO women. Program effectiveness and predictors of use.
    King ES; Ross E; Seay J; Balshem A; Rimer B
    J Aging Health; 1995 Nov; 7(4):529-51. PubMed ID: 10165968
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Can tailored interventions increase mammography use among HMO women?
    Lipkus IM; Rimer BK; Halabi S; Strigo TS
    Am J Prev Med; 2000 Jan; 18(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 10808977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Increasing pneumococcal vaccination in managed care through telephone outreach.
    Winston CA; Mims AD; Leatherwood KA
    Am J Manag Care; 2007 Oct; 13(10):581-8. PubMed ID: 17927463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A 4-year randomized trial comparing three outreach interventions to promote screening mammograms.
    Luckmann R; Costanza ME; White MJ; Frisard CF; Rosal M; Sama S; Landry MR; Yood R
    Transl Behav Med; 2019 Mar; 9(2):328-335. PubMed ID: 29796649
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Randomized controlled trial of a repeat mammography intervention: effect of adherence definitions on results.
    Partin MR; Slater JS; Caplan L
    Prev Med; 2005; 41(3-4):734-40. PubMed ID: 16043216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of cancer screening practices by Hispanic women: analyses by subgroup.
    Zambrana RE; Breen N; Fox SA; Gutierrez-Mohamed ML
    Prev Med; 1999 Dec; 29(6 Pt 1):466-77. PubMed ID: 10600427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Barriers to adherence to preventive services reminder letters: the patient's perspective.
    Ornstein SM; Musham C; Reid A; Jenkins RG; Zemp LD; Garr DR
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Feb; 36(2):195-200. PubMed ID: 8426139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Breast cancer screening complacency and compliance.
    Maurer WJ
    Wis Med J; 1995; 94(6):305-6. PubMed ID: 7625089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.