BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

260 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10564631)

  • 1. Screening mammography referral rates for women ages 50 to 69 years by recently-licensed family physicians: physician and practice environment correlates.
    Haggerty J; Tamblyn R; Abrahamowicz M; Beaulieu MD; Kishchuk N
    Prev Med; 1999 Nov; 29(5):391-404. PubMed ID: 10564631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dental screening and referral of young children by pediatric primary care providers.
    dela Cruz GG; Rozier RG; Slade G
    Pediatrics; 2004 Nov; 114(5):e642-52. PubMed ID: 15520094
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Preventive care for women. Does the sex of the physician matter?
    Lurie N; Slater J; McGovern P; Ekstrum J; Quam L; Margolis K
    N Engl J Med; 1993 Aug; 329(7):478-82. PubMed ID: 8332153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Use of screening mammography by general internists.
    Taylor VM; Montano DE; Koepsell T
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(6):455-62. PubMed ID: 7867018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Characteristics of primary care physicians and their practices associated with mammography rates for older women.
    Van Harrison R; Janz NK; Wolfe RA; Tedeschi PJ; Stross JK; Huang X; McMahon LF
    Cancer; 2003 Nov; 98(9):1811-21. PubMed ID: 14584062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Compliance with mammography guidelines: physician recommendation and patient adherence.
    May DS; Kiefe CI; Funkhouser E; Fouad MN
    Prev Med; 1999 Apr; 28(4):386-94. PubMed ID: 10090868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Can you use a sequential sample of patients as a substitute for a full practice audit?: Study of mammography screening rates in 20 family practices in Ontario.
    Swanson G; Kaczorowski J
    Can Fam Physician; 2008 Oct; 54(10):1436-7, 1437.e1-5. PubMed ID: 18854475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Clinical decision-making and mammography referral.
    Grady KE; Lemkau JP; McVay JM; Carlson S; Lee N; Minchella M; Caddell C
    Prev Med; 1996; 25(3):327-38. PubMed ID: 8781011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Family physicians' initiative to increase compliance with screening mammography--an innovative community project.
    Eilat-Tsanani S; Sorek M; Gay N; Chaimovitch O; Kulton L; Tabenkin H
    Isr Med Assoc J; 2001 Dec; 3(12):920-4. PubMed ID: 11794915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Influence of physician and patient characteristics on adherence to breast cancer screening recommendations.
    Abdel-Malek N; Chiarelli AM; Sloan M; Stewart DE; Mai V; Howlett RI
    Eur J Cancer Prev; 2008 Feb; 17(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 18090910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Physician recommendations for screening mammography: results of a survey using clinical vignettes.
    Hamblin JE
    J Fam Pract; 1991 May; 32(5):472-7. PubMed ID: 2022935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Compliance with screening mammography. Survey of primary care physicians.
    Roetzheim RG; Van Durme DJ; Brownlee HJ; Herold AH; Pamies RJ; Woodard L
    J Fla Med Assoc; 1991 Jul; 78(7):426-9. PubMed ID: 1919495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Patient, physician, and community factors affecting referrals to specialists in Ontario, Canada: a population-based, multi-level modelling approach.
    Chan BT; Austin PC
    Med Care; 2003 Apr; 41(4):500-11. PubMed ID: 12665714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Primary care practice and facility quality orientation: influence on breast and cervical cancer screening rates.
    Goldzweig CL; Parkerton PH; Washington DL; Lanto AB; Yano EM
    Am J Manag Care; 2004 Apr; 10(4):265-72. PubMed ID: 15124503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Variation in screening mammography and Papanicolaou smear by primary care physician specialty and gatekeeper plan (United States).
    Haggstrom DA; Phillips KA; Liang SY; Haas JS; Tye S; Kerlikowske K
    Cancer Causes Control; 2004 Nov; 15(9):883-92. PubMed ID: 15577290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Controversy about mammography screening guidelines and physician practices at a university medical center.
    Reifel J; Bastani R; Ganz PA
    J Cancer Educ; 1998; 13(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 10898559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Factors influencing mammogram ordering at the time of the office visit.
    Conry CM; Main DS; Miller RS; Iverson DC; Calonge BN
    J Fam Pract; 1993 Oct; 37(4):356-60. PubMed ID: 8409889
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Gender differences in time spent during direct observation of doctor-patient encounters.
    Tabenkin H; Goodwin MA; Zyzanski SJ; Stange KC; Medalie JH
    J Womens Health (Larchmt); 2004 Apr; 13(3):341-9. PubMed ID: 15130263
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. What influences family physicians' cancer screening decisions when practice guidelines are unclear or conflicting?
    Tudiver F; Guibert R; Haggerty J; Ciampi A; Medved W; Brown JB; Herbert C; Katz A; Ritvo P; Grant B; Goel V; Smith P; O'Beirne M; Williams JI; Moliner P
    J Fam Pract; 2002 Sep; 51(9):760. PubMed ID: 12366894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. What factors influence a family physician's decision to refer a patient to a specialist?
    Iverson GD; Coleridge ST; Fulda KG; Licciardone JC
    Rural Remote Health; 2005; 5(3):413. PubMed ID: 16029113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.