140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10566176)
1. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution in patients post open-heart surgery.
Zácek P; Kunes P; Kobzová E; Dominik J
Acta Medica (Hradec Kralove); 1999; 42(1):19-23. PubMed ID: 10566176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Noninvasive assessment of cardiac output using thoracic electrical bioimpedance in hemodynamically stable and unstable patients after cardiac surgery: a comparison with pulmonary artery thermodilution.
Suttner S; Schöllhorn T; Boldt J; Mayer J; Röhm KD; Lang K; Piper SN
Intensive Care Med; 2006 Dec; 32(12):2053-8. PubMed ID: 17039348
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of bioimpedance versus thermodilution cardiac output during cardiac surgery: evaluation of a second-generation bioimpedance device.
Spiess BD; Patel MA; Soltow LO; Wright IH
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2001 Oct; 15(5):567-73. PubMed ID: 11687996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Equivalence of bioimpedance and thermodilution in measuring cardiac index after cardiac surgery.
Sageman WS; Riffenburgh RH; Spiess BD
J Cardiothorac Vasc Anesth; 2002 Feb; 16(1):8-14. PubMed ID: 11854871
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Measurement of cardiac output with non-invasive Aesculon impedance versus thermodilution.
Petter H; Erik A; Björn E; Göran R
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging; 2011 Jan; 31(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 21143753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Thoracic electrical bioimpedance: a non-invasive measure of cardiac output for porcine research.
Broomhead CJ; Wright SJ; Kiff KM; Withington PS
Lab Anim; 1998 Jul; 32(3):324-9. PubMed ID: 9718481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The accuracy of bioimpedance cardiography in the measurement of cardiac output in comparison with thermodilution method.
Wong KL; Hou PC
Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1996 Jun; 34(2):55-9. PubMed ID: 9084523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Predictors of between-method differences in cardiac output measurement using thoracic electrical bioimpedance and thermodilution.
Doering L; Lum E; Dracup K; Friedman A
Crit Care Med; 1995 Oct; 23(10):1667-73. PubMed ID: 7587231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac output measurement with thermodilution method in post coronary artery bypass graft patients.
Sharma V; Singh A; Kansara B; Karlekar A
Ann Card Anaesth; 2011; 14(2):104-10. PubMed ID: 21636930
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of cardiac output measurements by thermodilution and thoracic electrical bioimpedance in critically ill versus non-critically ill patients.
Weiss S; Calloway E; Cairo J; Granger W; Winslow J
Am J Emerg Med; 1995 Nov; 13(6):626-31. PubMed ID: 7575799
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Non-invasive cardiac output by transthoracic electrical bioimpedence in post-cardiac surgery patients: comparison with thermodilution method.
Gujjar AR; Muralidhar K; Banakal S; Gupta R; Sathyaprabha TN; Jairaj PS
J Clin Monit Comput; 2008 Jun; 22(3):175-80. PubMed ID: 18418719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Cardiac output measurement: lack of agreement between thermodilution and thoracic electric bioimpedance in two clinical settings.
Atallah MM; Demain AD
J Clin Anesth; 1995 May; 7(3):182-5. PubMed ID: 7669305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cardiac output determinations in the pig--thoracic electrical bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Jivegård L; Frid I; Haljamäe H; Holm J; Holm S; Wickström I
Crit Care Med; 1990 Sep; 18(9):995-8. PubMed ID: 2394124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. [Noninvasive evaluation of cardiac index and ejection fraction in ischemic heart disease. Comparison of thoracic bioimpedance, thermodilution and cineventriculography].
Talarico G; Saino A; Lotto A
Minerva Cardioangiol; 1992 Jun; 40(6):203-9. PubMed ID: 1407614
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cardiac output measurement in critical care patients: Thoracic Electrical Bioimpedance versus thermodilution.
Clancy TV; Norman K; Reynolds R; Covington D; Maxwell JG
J Trauma; 1991 Aug; 31(8):1116-20; discussion 1120-1. PubMed ID: 1875438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Reproducibility and comparison of cardiac output measurement by transthoracic bioimpedance and thermodilution methods in critically ill patients.
Ng HW; Coleman N; Walley TJ; Mostafa SM; Breckenridge AM
Clin Intensive Care; 1993; 4(5):217-21. PubMed ID: 10146700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Simultaneous comparison of thoracic bioimpedance and arterial pulse waveform-derived cardiac output with thermodilution measurement.
Hirschl MM; Kittler H; Woisetschläger C; Siostrzonek P; Staudinger T; Kofler J; Oschatz E; Bur A; Gwechenberger M; Laggner AN
Crit Care Med; 2000 Jun; 28(6):1798-802. PubMed ID: 10890622
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Comparison of ICG thoracic bioimpedance cardiac output monitoring system in patients undergoing cardiac surgery with pulmonary artery cardiac output measurements].
Simon R; Desebbe O; Hénaine R; Bastien O; Lehot JJ; Cannesson M
Ann Fr Anesth Reanim; 2009 Jun; 28(6):537-41. PubMed ID: 19525086
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multicenter trial of a new thoracic electrical bioimpedance device for cardiac output estimation.
Shoemaker WC; Wo CC; Bishop MH; Appel PL; Van de Water JM; Harrington GR; Wang X; Patil RS
Crit Care Med; 1994 Dec; 22(12):1907-12. PubMed ID: 7988125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparison of thermodilution and transthoracic electrical bioimpedance cardiac outputs.
Woo MA; Hamilton M; Stevenson LW; Vredevoe DL
Heart Lung; 1991 Jul; 20(4):357-62. PubMed ID: 2071427
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
