These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10566450)

  • 21. On implementing clinical decision support: achieving scalability and maintainability by combining business rules and ontologies.
    Kashyap V; Morales A; Hongsermeier T
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():414-8. PubMed ID: 17238374
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Design and implementation of a framework to support the development of clinical guidelines.
    de Clercq PA; Hasman A; Blom JA; Korsten HH
    Int J Med Inform; 2001 Dec; 64(2-3):285-318. PubMed ID: 11734393
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Approaches for guideline versioning using GLIF.
    Peleg M; Kantor R
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():509-13. PubMed ID: 14728225
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Handling expressiveness and comprehensibility requirements in GLIF3.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH; Patel VL
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2001; 84(Pt 1):241-5. PubMed ID: 11604741
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Sharable representation of clinical guidelines in GLIF: relationship to the Arden Syntax.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Bernstam E; Tu S; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
    J Biomed Inform; 2001 Jun; 34(3):170-81. PubMed ID: 11723699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Modeling guidelines for integration into clinical workflow.
    Tu SW; Musen MA; Shankar R; Campbell J; Hrabak K; McClay J; Huff SM; McClure R; Parker C; Rocha R; Abarbanel R; Beard N; Glasgow J; Mansfield G; Ram P; Ye Q; Mays E; Weida T; Chute CG; McDonald K; Molu D; Nyman MA; Scheitel S; Solbrig H; Zill DA; Goldstein MK
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 1):174-8. PubMed ID: 15360798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. GLIF3: a representation format for sharable computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines.
    Boxwala AA; Peleg M; Tu S; Ogunyemi O; Zeng QT; Wang D; Patel VL; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
    J Biomed Inform; 2004 Jun; 37(3):147-61. PubMed ID: 15196480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The structure of guideline recommendations: a synthesis.
    Tu SW; Campbell J; Musen MA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2003; 2003():679-83. PubMed ID: 14728259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Applying Hybrid-Asbru clinical guidelines using the Spock system.
    Young O; Shahar Y
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():854-8. PubMed ID: 16779161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Comparison of primary care expert and computer-interpretable depression screening guideline recommendations.
    Choi J; Bakken S
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():887. PubMed ID: 17238506
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. A platform to develop and to improve effectiveness of online computable guidelines.
    Dufour JC; Fieschi M; Fieschi D; Giorgi R; Gouvernet J
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 95():800-5. PubMed ID: 14664086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Semantic clinical guideline documents.
    Eriksson H; Tu SW; Musen M
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2005; 2005():236-40. PubMed ID: 16779037
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Integration of clinical decision support with on-line encounter documentation for well child care at the point of care.
    Porcelli PJ; Lobach DF
    Proc AMIA Symp; 1999; ():599-603. PubMed ID: 10566429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Representation primitives, process models and patient data in computer-interpretable clinical practice guidelines: a literature review of guideline representation models.
    Wang D; Peleg M; Tu SW; Boxwala AA; Greenes RA; Patel VL; Shortliffe EH
    Int J Med Inform; 2002 Dec; 68(1-3):59-70. PubMed ID: 12467791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. GASTON: an architecture for the acquisition and execution of clinical guideline-application tasks.
    De Clercq PA; Blom JA; Hasman A; Korsten HH
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2000; 25(4):247-63. PubMed ID: 11198187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A multiple-scenario assessment of the effect of a continuous-care, guideline-based decision support system on clinicians' compliance to clinical guidelines.
    Shalom E; Shahar Y; Parmet Y; Lunenfeld E
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Apr; 84(4):248-62. PubMed ID: 25649843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The InterMed approach to sharable computer-interpretable guidelines: a review.
    Peleg M; Boxwala AA; Tu S; Zeng Q; Ogunyemi O; Wang D; Patel VL; Greenes RA; Shortliffe EH
    J Am Med Inform Assoc; 2004; 11(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 14527977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Evaluation of a commercial rule engine as a basis for a clinical decision support service.
    Goldberg HS; Vashevko M; Pastilnik A; Smith K; Plaks N; Blumenfeld BM
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2006; 2006():294-8. PubMed ID: 17238350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. A quality and safety framework for point-of-care clinical guidelines.
    Fox J; Bury J
    Proc AMIA Symp; 2000; ():245-9. PubMed ID: 11079882
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [The computerized clinical practical guideline's research and implementation].
    Li Y; Zhao JP; Li SZ
    Zhongguo Yi Liao Qi Xie Za Zhi; 2009 Nov; 33(6):407-9. PubMed ID: 20352910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.