These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10566928)
1. Water flow between the upper esophagus and pharynx for the LMA and COPA in fresh cadavers. Laryngeal mask airway, and cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Brimacombe J; Keller C Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1064-6. PubMed ID: 10566928 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does the ProSeal laryngeal mask airway prevent aspiration of regurgitated fluid? Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A Anesth Analg; 2000 Oct; 91(4):1017-20. PubMed ID: 11004067 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do laryngeal mask airway devices attenuate liquid flow between the esophagus and pharynx? A randomized, controlled cadaver study. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Rädler C; Pühringer F Anesth Analg; 1999 Apr; 88(4):904-7. PubMed ID: 10195545 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Mucosal pressures from the cuffed oropharyngeal airway vs the laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J Br J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 82(6):922-4. PubMed ID: 10562790 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and laryngeal mask airway in spontaneous breathing anesthesia. Hsu YW; Pan MH; Huang CJ; Cheng CR; Wu KH; Wei TT; Chen CT Acta Anaesthesiol Sin; 1998 Dec; 36(4):187-92. PubMed ID: 10399513 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal tube airway versus ProSeal laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Kleinsasser A; Loeckinger A Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 2003 Jun; 38(6):393-6. PubMed ID: 12759874 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA) with the laryngeal mask airway (LMA) during manually controlled positive pressure ventilation. Heringlake M; Doerges V; Ocker H; Schmucker P J Clin Anesth; 1999 Nov; 11(7):590-5. PubMed ID: 10624645 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A comparison of the laryngeal mask airway and cuffed oropharyngeal airway in anesthetized adult patients. Brimacombe JR; Brimacombe JC; Berry AM; Morris R; Mecklem D; Clarke G; Barry J; Kirk T Anesth Analg; 1998 Jul; 87(1):147-52. PubMed ID: 9661564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pharyngeal mucosal pressure and perfusion: a fiberoptic evaluation of the posterior pharynx in anesthetized adult patients with a modified cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Brimacombe J; Keller C; Pühringer F Anesthesiology; 1999 Dec; 91(6):1661-5. PubMed ID: 10598608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A randomized controlled trial comparing the cuffed oropharyngeal airway and the laryngeal mask airway in spontaneously breathing anesthetized adults. Greenberg RS; Brimacombe J; Berry A; Gouze V; Piantadosi S; Dake EM Anesthesiology; 1998 Apr; 88(4):970-7. PubMed ID: 9579506 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of mucosal pressures induced by cuffs of different airway devices. Ulrich-Pur H; Hrska F; Krafft P; Friehs H; Wulkersdorfer B; Köstler WJ; Rabitsch W; Staudinger T; Schuster E; Frass M Anesthesiology; 2006 May; 104(5):933-8. PubMed ID: 16645443 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The influence of cuff volume and anatomic location on pharyngeal, esophageal, and tracheal mucosal pressures with the esophageal tracheal combitube. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Boehler M; Loeckinger A; Puehringer F Anesthesiology; 2002 May; 96(5):1074-7. PubMed ID: 11981145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Airway management in spontaneously breathing anaesthetized children: comparison of the Laryngeal Mask Airway with the cuffed oropharyngeal airway. Mamaya B Paediatr Anaesth; 2002 Jun; 12(5):411-5. PubMed ID: 12060326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Use of cuffed oropharyngeal vs laryngeal mask airway in elderly patients. Ezri T; Ady N; Szmuk P; Glanz L; Shklar B; Katz J; Geva D Can J Anaesth; 1999 Apr; 46(4):363-7. PubMed ID: 10232721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Ease of ventilation through the cuffed oropharyngeal airway (COPA), the laryngeal mask airway and the face mask in a cardiopulmonary resuscitation training manikin. Garcia-Guasch R; Ferrà M; Benito P; Oltra J; Roca J Resuscitation; 2001 Aug; 50(2):173-7. PubMed ID: 11719145 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways. Brimacombe J; Keller C Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]