These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

134 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10568462)

  • 21. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: In-plant survey of targeted carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, value, and marketing of fed steers and heifers.
    Moore MC; Gray GD; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; Igo JL; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Lawrence TE; Delmore RJ; Christensen LM; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5143-51. PubMed ID: 22952369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Beef carcass composition of slaughter cattle differing in frame size, muscle score, and external fatness.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Morgan JB; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Aug; 70(8):2431-45. PubMed ID: 1506305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Characterization of biological types of cattle (Cycle VI): carcass, yield, and longissimus palatability traits.
    Wheeler TL; Cundiff LV; Shackelford SD; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 2004 Apr; 82(4):1177-89. PubMed ID: 15080341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the Hennessy grading probe to predict yields of lamb carcasses fabricated to multiple end points.
    Garrett RP; Edwards JW; Savell JW; Tatum JD
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Apr; 70(4):1146-52. PubMed ID: 1582945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Opportunities to improve the accuracy of the United States Department of Agriculture beef yield grade equation through precision agriculture.
    Jaborek JR; Relling AE; Fluharty FL; Moeller SJ; Zerby HN
    Transl Anim Sci; 2020 Apr; 4(2):txaa033. PubMed ID: 32705031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effects of breed type and accelerated fat removal on subprimal yields and carcass values.
    Miller MF; Ramsey CB; Claborn SW; Wu CK
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Apr; 73(4):1055-63. PubMed ID: 7628948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Predicting beef carcass cutability.
    Shackelford SD; Cundiff LV; Gregory KE; Koohmaraie M
    J Anim Sci; 1995 Feb; 73(2):406-13. PubMed ID: 7601772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. National Beef Quality Audit-2016: In-plant survey of carcass characteristics related to quality, quantity, and value of fed steers and heifers.
    Boykin CA; Eastwood LC; Harris MK; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Arnold AN; Hasty JD; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Delmore RJ; Martin JN; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Pfeiffer MM; Lawrence TE; McEvers TJ; Schmidt TB; Maddock RJ; Johnson DD; Carr CC; Scheffler JM; Pringle TD; Stelzleni AM; Gottlieb J; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2017 Jul; 95(7):2993-3002. PubMed ID: 28727109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of live and carcass equations predicting percentage of cutability, retail product weight, and trimmable fat in beef cattle.
    Herring WO; Williams SE; Bertrand JK; Benyshek LL; Miller DC
    J Anim Sci; 1994 May; 72(5):1107-18. PubMed ID: 8056655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. National Beef Quality Audit-2011: Survey of instrument grading assessments of beef carcass characteristics.
    Gray GD; Moore MC; Hale DS; Kerth CR; Griffin DB; Savell JW; Raines CR; Lawrence TE; Belk KE; Woerner DR; Tatum JD; VanOverbeke DL; Mafi GG; Delmore RJ; Shackelford SD; King DA; Wheeler TL; Meadows LR; O'Connor ME
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Dec; 90(13):5152-8. PubMed ID: 22952354
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Using live estimates and ultrasound measurements to predict beef carcass cutability.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Harris JJ; Morgan JB; Garrett RP; Williams FL; Wise JW; Cross HR; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2000 May; 78(5):1255-61. PubMed ID: 10834579
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Prediction of retail product weight and percentage using ultrasound and carcass measurements in beef cattle.
    Greiner SP; Rouse GH; Wilson DE; Cundiff LV; Wheeler TL
    J Anim Sci; 2003 Jul; 81(7):1736-42. PubMed ID: 12854810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Effects of zilpaterol hydrochloride on retail yields of subprimals from beef and calf-fed Holstein steers.
    Haneklaus AN; Hodgen JM; Delmore RJ; Lawrence TE; Yates DA; Allen DM; Griffin DB; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Sep; 89(9):2867-77. PubMed ID: 21478448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Quantification of saleable meat yield using objective measurements captured by video image analysis technology.
    McEvers TJ; Hutcheson JP; Lawrence TE
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3294-300. PubMed ID: 22966082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The influence of sex-class, USDA yield grade and USDA quality grade on seam fat trim from the primals of beef carcasses.
    Jones DK; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1990 Jul; 68(7):1987-91. PubMed ID: 2384389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Predicting carcass composition of beef cattle using ultrasound technology.
    Griffin DB; Savell JW; Recio HA; Garrett RP; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Apr; 77(4):889-92. PubMed ID: 10328353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Estimates of beef carcass intermuscular fat.
    Kent KR; Davis GW; Ramsey CB; Schluter AR
    J Anim Sci; 1991 Dec; 69(12):4836-44. PubMed ID: 1808178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Using current on-line carcass evaluation parameters to estimate boneless and bone-in pork carcass yield as influenced by trim level.
    Berg EP; Grams DW; Miller RK; Wise JW; Forrest JC; Savell JW
    J Anim Sci; 1999 Aug; 77(8):1977-84. PubMed ID: 10461971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Using measurements of muscle color, pH, and electrical impedance to augment the current USDA beef quality grading standards and improve the accuracy and precision of sorting carcasses into palatability groups.
    Wulf DM; Page JK
    J Anim Sci; 2000 Oct; 78(10):2595-607. PubMed ID: 11048925
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effect of frame size, muscle score, and external fatness on live and carcass value of beef cattle.
    May SG; Mies WL; Edwards JW; Williams FL; Wise JW; Harris JJ; Savell JW; Cross HR
    J Anim Sci; 1992 Nov; 70(11):3311-6. PubMed ID: 1459891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.