386 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10569848)
1. Intermediate sanctions flow charts.
Mandarino JC
J Health Law; 1999; 32(1):169-72. PubMed ID: 10569848
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. IRS hints at future. A joint venture's tax status may depend on control.
Bellandi D
Mod Healthc; 1997 Nov; 27(45):6. PubMed ID: 10174173
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Unanswered questions. Joint venture parties struggling to apply revenue ruling.
Bellandi D; Hallam K
Mod Healthc; 1998 Jun; 28(26):52, 54. PubMed ID: 10182343
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. Federal tax developments affecting health care organizations--Part II: New rulings and court decisions.
Ing E
Med Interface; 1997 Apr; 10(4):124-8, 146. PubMed ID: 10166798
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Rev. Rul. 98-15: what does it mean for joint ventures between nonprofits and for-profits.
Duronio CD
Benders Health Care Law Mon; 1998 Apr; ():4-11. PubMed ID: 10181984
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Special report on taxation and corporate/finance nonprofit/for-profit affiliations.
Schieble MT
Health Care Law Newsl; 1994 Aug; 9(8):16-21. PubMed ID: 10136039
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. A baby step on joint ventures. IRS gives not-for-profits hope for using tax exemption in deals with for-profits.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2001 Apr; 31(16):12-3. PubMed ID: 11330092
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. On the (marketing) campaign trail. Austin system's public relations push may have helped cause in tax case.
Taylor M
Mod Healthc; 2002 Jul; 32(26):14-5. PubMed ID: 12140840
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. Joint ventures. Collaborative push supersedes operators' ownership status.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1993 Jun; 23(24):28, 30. PubMed ID: 10126315
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. IRS: tax status not imperiled.
Burda D
Mod Healthc; 1993 Mar; 23(12):13. PubMed ID: 10124732
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. There's no profiting from a joint venture misadventure.
Herschman GW
Healthc Financ Manage; 2004 Oct; 58(10):72-4, 76. PubMed ID: 15524037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The tax exempt clinic.
Bromberg RS
Integr Healthc Rep; 1993 Aug; ():10-9. PubMed ID: 10128316
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Taxpayers Bill of Rights 2. The emergence of intermediate sanctions.
Burns LP
Mich Health Hosp; 1997; 33(1):24. PubMed ID: 10164311
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. In the same boat. For-profit, not-for-profit hospitals face peril of tax reform.
Weissenstein E
Mod Healthc; 1997 Apr; 27(16):38-40. PubMed ID: 10166528
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Hospital joint ventures. IRS focuses on who is in control.
Burns LP
Mich Health Hosp; 1998; 34(4):32. PubMed ID: 10182841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Management services coupled with control equals exemption: Priv. Ltr. Rul. 98-47-033.
Bohm D
Health Care Law Mon; 1999 Mar; ():9-10. PubMed ID: 10351448
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Regulation mania. IRS unleashes long-awaited rules on intermediate sanctions law.
Bellandi D
Mod Healthc; 2001 Jan; 31(3):8. PubMed ID: 11418951
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Intermediate sanctions flow charts.
Mandarino JC
J Health Law; 2003; 36(1):169-73. PubMed ID: 12784925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Study for Columbia hits not-for-profits.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1993 Nov; 23(44):3, 14. PubMed ID: 10129869
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Tax-exempts feeling the heat.
Greene J
Mod Healthc; 1995 Nov; 25(47):46-8, 50, 52-3. PubMed ID: 10152561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
