These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
169 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10569854)
1. Regulation of pre-conception agreements: a synthesis of individual rights and community values. Shewchuk TR Health Law J; 1993; 1():147-89. PubMed ID: 10569854 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Forum on surrogate motherhood. Introduction. Gostin L Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):5-6. PubMed ID: 3205042 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Procreative liberty and the control of conception, pregnancy, and childbirth. Robertson JA Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1984 Feb; 5(12):7-66. PubMed ID: 10264856 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Conflicts between protecting and respecting women: the prohibition of sex-selected birth. Dickens BM Hum Health Care Int; 1997; 13(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 16729411 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Protectionism and freedom of contract: the erosion of female autonomy in surrogacy decisions. Munyon JH Suffolk Univ Law Rev; 2003; 36(3):717-44. PubMed ID: 15568233 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
7. Reproductive technologies and surrogacy: a feminist perspective. Rothman BK Creighton Law Rev; 1992 Nov; 25(5):1599-607. PubMed ID: 11653382 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. A civil liberties analysis of surrogacy arrangements. Gostin L Law Med Health Care; 1988; 16(1-2):7-17. PubMed ID: 3060686 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
10. What are the legal rights of the unborn child? Vernon J Neonatal Netw; 1997 Jun; 16(4):73-4. PubMed ID: 9216327 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. A question of meaning? Controversies about the new reproductive technologies in the Netherlands. Kirejczyk M Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1990; 3(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 11649279 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Switched at the fertility clinic: determining maternal rights when a child is born from stolen or misdelivered genetic material. Noble-Allgire AM Miss Law Rev; 1999; 64(3):517-94. PubMed ID: 16523582 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A review of surrogate motherhood regulation in south American countries: pointing to a need for an international legal framework. Torres G; Shapiro A; Mackey TK BMC Pregnancy Childbirth; 2019 Jan; 19(1):46. PubMed ID: 30691390 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The new reproductive technologies: a technological handmaid's tale. National Action Committee on the Status of Women (Canada) Issues Reprod Genet Eng; 1991; 4(3):279-96. PubMed ID: 11651221 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Surrogacy: a last resort alternative for infertile women or a commodification of women's bodies and children? Kerian CL Wis Womens Law J; 1997; 12(1):113-66. PubMed ID: 16281339 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Recommendation 1074 on family policy, 3 May 1988. Council of Europe. Parliamentary Assembly Annu Rev Popul Law; 1988; 15():83, 471-4. PubMed ID: 12289698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Consent and marital status--the legalities. Rozovsky LE; Rozovsky FA Can Oper Room Nurs J; 1986 Jun; 4(3):19-20. PubMed ID: 3639758 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Women and social security: a progressive approach. Achenbaum WA J Aging Soc Policy; 1994; 6(3):1-2. PubMed ID: 10186864 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. New reproductive technologies: international feminist concerns. Kanno N Sci People; 1987; 19(4):5-8,27. PubMed ID: 11655838 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Beyond Baby M: international perspectives on gestational surrogacy and the demise of the unitary biological mother. Krim TM Ann Health Law; 1996; (5):193-226. PubMed ID: 10184657 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]