BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

227 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10571382)

  • 1. Scale-space signatures for the detection of clustered microcalculations in digital mammograms.
    Netsch T; Peitgen HO
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1999 Sep; 18(9):774-86. PubMed ID: 10571382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A CAD system for the automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications in digitized mammogram films.
    Yu S; Guan L
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Feb; 19(2):115-26. PubMed ID: 10784283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Normalization of local contrast in mammograms.
    Veldkamp WJ; Karssemeijer N
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2000 Jul; 19(7):731-8. PubMed ID: 11055788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of computer-aided detection techniques and signal characteristics for clustered microcalcifications on digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis.
    Samala RK; Chan HP; Hadjiiski LM; Helvie MA
    Phys Med Biol; 2016 Oct; 61(19):7092-7112. PubMed ID: 27648708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Quantification of Al-equivalent thickness of just visible microcalcifications in full field digital mammograms.
    Carton AK; Bosmans H; Vandenbroucke D; Souverijns G; Van Ongeval C; Dragusin O; Marchal G
    Med Phys; 2004 Jul; 31(7):2165-76. PubMed ID: 15305471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of an automated wavelet-based system dedicated to the detection of clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Lado M; Tahoces PG; Méndez AJ; Souto M; Vidal JJ
    Med Inform Internet Med; 2001; 26(3):149-63. PubMed ID: 11706926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer aided system for segmentation and visualization of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Reljin B; Milosević Z; Stojić T; Reljin I
    Folia Histochem Cytobiol; 2009 Jan; 47(3):525-32. PubMed ID: 20164042
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Computerized analysis of mammographic microcalcifications in morphological and texture feature spaces.
    Chan HP; Sahiner B; Lam KL; Petrick N; Helvie MA; Goodsitt MM; Adler DD
    Med Phys; 1998 Oct; 25(10):2007-19. PubMed ID: 9800710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Visually lossless threshold determination for microcalcification detection in wavelet compressed mammograms.
    Kocsis O; Costaridou L; Varaki L; Likaki E; Kalogeropoulou C; Skiadopoulos S; Panayiotakis G
    Eur Radiol; 2003 Oct; 13(10):2390-6. PubMed ID: 14534807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Real and simulated clustered microcalcifications in digital mammograms. ROC study of observer performance.
    Lado MJ; Tahoces PG; Souto M; Méndez AJ; Vidal JJ
    Med Phys; 1997 Sep; 24(9):1385-94. PubMed ID: 9304566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detection of clustered microcalcifications in small field digital mammography.
    Arodź T; Kurdziel M; Popiela TJ; Sevre EO; Yuen DA
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2006 Jan; 81(1):56-65. PubMed ID: 16310282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relevance vector machine for automatic detection of clustered microcalcifications.
    Wei L; Yang Y; Nishikawa RM; Wernick MN; Edwards A
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2005 Oct; 24(10):1278-85. PubMed ID: 16229415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Computer-aided detection system for clustered microcalcifications: comparison of performance on full-field digital mammograms and digitized screen-film mammograms.
    Ge J; Hadjiiski LM; Sahiner B; Wei J; Helvie MA; Zhou C; Chan HP
    Phys Med Biol; 2007 Feb; 52(4):981-1000. PubMed ID: 17264365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Computer aided detection of microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Boccignone G; Chianese A; Picariello A
    Comput Biol Med; 2000 Sep; 30(5):267-86. PubMed ID: 10913773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Segmentation of suspicious clustered microcalcifications in mammograms.
    Gavrielides MA; Lo JY; Vargas-Voracek R; Floyd CE
    Med Phys; 2000 Jan; 27(1):13-22. PubMed ID: 10659733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for detecting microcalcifications in digital mammograms.
    Wallet BC; Solka JL; Priebe CE
    J Digit Imaging; 1997 Aug; 10(3 Suppl 1):136-9. PubMed ID: 9268859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. A support vector machine approach for detection of microcalcifications.
    El-Naqa I; Yang Y; Wernick MN; Galatsanos NP; Nishikawa RM
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Dec; 21(12):1552-63. PubMed ID: 12588039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Digital mammography: observer performance study of the effects of pixel size on the characterization of malignant and benign microcalcifications.
    Chan HP; Helvie MA; Petrick N; Sahiner B; Adler DD; Paramagul C; Roubidoux MA; Blane CE; Joynt LK; Wilson TE; Hadjiiski LM; Goodsitt MM
    Acad Radiol; 2001 Jun; 8(6):454-66. PubMed ID: 11394537
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Improved microcalcification visualization using dual-energy digital mammography.
    Tsai CJ; Chen RC; Peng HL; Hsu WL; Lee JJ
    Acta Radiol; 2013 Jul; 54(6):614-21. PubMed ID: 23528569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A novel approach to microcalcification detection using fuzzy logic technique.
    Cheng HD; Lui YM; Freimanis RI
    IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1998 Jun; 17(3):442-50. PubMed ID: 9735907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.