These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10571390)

  • 1. Evaluation of oculokinetic perimetry.
    Chia WL; Goldberg I; Bauman A
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):306-11. PubMed ID: 10571390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with Humphrey visual field analysis in the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Wishart PK
    Eye (Lond); 1993; 7 ( Pt 1)():113-21. PubMed ID: 8325400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A comparison of the OKP visual field screening test with the Humphrey field analyser.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1992; 6 ( Pt 5)():521-4. PubMed ID: 1286719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Can the current oculokinetic perimetry chart be improved?
    Chia WL; Goldberg I
    Aust N Z J Ophthalmol; 1999 Oct; 27(5):312-7. PubMed ID: 10571391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with the use of neutral density filters.
    Vernon SA; Quigley HA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 4)():406-9. PubMed ID: 7821461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Application of oculokinetic perimetry in examination of the eye].
    Wakakura M; Kageyama M; Hamanaka T; Shimizu K; Joshita H; Shimizu T; Baba H; Kisara M; Miyata M
    Nippon Ganka Gakkai Zasshi; 1996 Jul; 100(7):551-7. PubMed ID: 8741340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A new chart to improve the efficiency of glaucoma detection by oculokinetic perimetry.
    Stirling RJ; MacLeod JD; Vernon SA
    Eye (Lond); 1994; 8 ( Pt 1)():121-4. PubMed ID: 8013705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Oculokinetic perimetry compared with standard perimetric threshold testing.
    Felius J; Langerhorst CT; van den Berg TJ; Greve EL
    Int Ophthalmol; 1992 Sep; 16(4-5):221-6. PubMed ID: 1428547
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effectiveness of unsupervised oculokinetic perimetry for detecting glaucomatous visual field defects.
    Harper RA; Hill AR; Reeves BC
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1994 Apr; 14(2):199-202. PubMed ID: 8022603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Clinical evaluation of a multi-fixation campimeter for the detection of glaucomatous visual field loss.
    Mutlukan E; Damato BE; Jay JL
    Br J Ophthalmol; 1993 Jun; 77(6):332-8. PubMed ID: 8318478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of the oculokinetic perimetry glaucoma screener with two types of visual field analyser.
    Greve M; Chisholm IA
    Can J Ophthalmol; 1993 Aug; 28(5):201-6. PubMed ID: 8221366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of frequency doubling perimetry in detecting neuro-ophthalmic visual field defects.
    Thomas D; Thomas R; Muliyil JP; George R
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2001 Jun; 131(6):734-41. PubMed ID: 11384569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The detection of glaucomatous visual field defects by oculo-kinetic perimetry: which points are best for screening?
    Damato BE; Ahmed J; Allan D; McClure E; Jay JL
    Eye (Lond); 1989; 3 ( Pt 6)():727-31. PubMed ID: 2630353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Glaucoma screening with oculokinetic perimetry in general practice: is its specificity acceptable?
    Christoffersen T; Fors T; Waage S; Holtedahl K
    Eye (Lond); 1995; 9 ( Pt 6 Su)():36-9. PubMed ID: 8729017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Improving the sensitivity of the OKP visual field screening test with a blue stimulus on a dark background.
    Wessels IF; Randhawa RS
    Eye (Lond); 1996; 10 ( Pt 5)():620-5. PubMed ID: 8977793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A hand-held OKP chart for the screening of glaucoma: preliminary evaluation.
    Damato BE; Chyla J; McClure E; Jay JL; Allan D
    Eye (Lond); 1990; 4 ( Pt 4)():632-7. PubMed ID: 2226995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of VEP perimetry in normal subjects and glaucoma patients.
    Bengtsson B
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2002 Dec; 80(6):620-6. PubMed ID: 12485283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Glaucoma diagnostics.
    Geimer SA
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2013 Feb; 91 Thesis 1():1-32. PubMed ID: 23384049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparing the Performance of Compass Perimetry With Humphrey Field Analyzer in Eyes With Glaucoma.
    Rao HL; Raveendran S; James V; Dasari S; Palakurthy M; Reddy HB; Pradhan ZS; Rao DA; Puttaiah NK; Devi S
    J Glaucoma; 2017 Mar; 26(3):292-297. PubMed ID: 27977480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Evaluating a visual field screening test for glaucoma: how the choice of the gold standard affects the validity of the test.
    Ellish NJ; Higginbotham EJ
    Ophthalmic Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 8(5):297-307. PubMed ID: 11922383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.