These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

69 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10572843)

  • 1. Stage distribution at first and repeat examinations in breast cancer screening.
    Boer R; de Koning H; van Oortmarssen G; Warmerdam P; van der Maas P
    J Med Screen; 1999; 6(3):132-8. PubMed ID: 10572843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Diagnostic mode and tumor staging of breast cancers in the setting of opportunistic screenings].
    Graf O; Obermayer M; Scheurecker A; Hopf G; Kramer J; Frühwald F
    Rofo; 2006 Feb; 178(2):221-6. PubMed ID: 16435254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The SPECTRUM population model of the impact of screening and treatment on U.S. breast cancer trends from 1975 to 2000: principles and practice of the model methods.
    Mandelblatt J; Schechter CB; Lawrence W; Yi B; Cullen J
    J Natl Cancer Inst Monogr; 2006; (36):47-55. PubMed ID: 17032894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer screening: evidence for false reassurance?
    de Gelder R; van As E; Tilanus-Linthorst MM; Bartels CC; Boer R; Draisma G; de Koning HJ
    Int J Cancer; 2008 Aug; 123(3):680-6. PubMed ID: 18484587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reason for late-stage breast cancer: absence of screening or detection, or breakdown in follow-up?
    Taplin SH; Ichikawa L; Yood MU; Manos MM; Geiger AM; Weinmann S; Gilbert J; Mouchawar J; Leyden WA; Altaras R; Beverly RK; Casso D; Westbrook EO; Bischoff K; Zapka JG; Barlow WE
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2004 Oct; 96(20):1518-27. PubMed ID: 15494602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Breast cancer screening by mammography in women aged under 50 years in Japan.
    Morimoto T; Sasa M; Yamaguchi T; Kondo H; Akaiwa H; Sagara Y
    Anticancer Res; 2000; 20(5C):3689-94. PubMed ID: 11268440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimation of natural history parameters of breast cancer based on non-randomized organized screening data: subsidiary analysis of effects of inter-screening interval, sensitivity, and attendance rate on reduction of advanced cancer.
    Wu JC; Hakama M; Anttila A; Yen AM; Malila N; Sarkeala T; Auvinen A; Chiu SY; Chen HH
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 Jul; 122(2):553-66. PubMed ID: 20054645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Radiation risk of mammography related to benefit in screening programmes: a favourable balance?
    Beemsterboer PM; Warmerdam PG; Boer R; de Koning HJ
    J Med Screen; 1998; 5(2):81-7. PubMed ID: 9718526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of age, breast density, ethnicity, and estrogen replacement therapy on screening mammographic sensitivity and cancer stage at diagnosis: review of 183,134 screening mammograms in Albuquerque, New Mexico.
    Rosenberg RD; Hunt WC; Williamson MR; Gilliland FD; Wiest PW; Kelsey CA; Key CR; Linver MN
    Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):511-8. PubMed ID: 9807581
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Computer modelling of the Swedish two county trial of mammographic screening and trade offs between participation and screening interval.
    Fett MJ
    J Med Screen; 2001; 8(1):39-45. PubMed ID: 11373849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [Nationwide breast cancer screening fully accomplished; results from the implementation phase 1990-1997. National Evaluation Team for Breast Cancer Screening].
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2000 Jun; 144(23):1124-9. PubMed ID: 10876708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Results from an ultrasound-based familial ovarian cancer screening clinic: a 10-year observational study.
    Tailor A; Bourne TH; Campbell S; Okokon E; Dew T; Collins WP
    Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2003 Apr; 21(4):378-85. PubMed ID: 12704748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The National Breast and Cervical Cancer Early Detection Program: report on the first 4 years of mammography provided to medically underserved women.
    May DS; Lee NC; Nadel MR; Henson RM; Miller DS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):97-104. PubMed ID: 9423608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The natural history of breast carcinoma: what have we learned from screening?
    Tabár L; Duffy SW; Vitak B; Chen HH; Prevost TC
    Cancer; 1999 Aug; 86(3):449-62. PubMed ID: 10430253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robust modeling in screening studies: estimation of sensitivity and preclinical sojourn time distribution.
    Shen Y; Zelen M
    Biostatistics; 2005 Oct; 6(4):604-14. PubMed ID: 15860542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Reducing ovarian cancer mortality through screening: Is it possible, and can we afford it?
    Havrilesky LJ; Sanders GD; Kulasingam S; Myers ER
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 18722004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Estimating lead time and sensitivity in a screening program without estimating the incidence in the screened group.
    Straatman H; Peer PG; Verbeek AL
    Biometrics; 1997 Mar; 53(1):217-29. PubMed ID: 9147591
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Simulation-based parameter estimation for complex models: a breast cancer natural history modelling illustration.
    Chia YL; Salzman P; Plevritis SK; Glynn PW
    Stat Methods Med Res; 2004 Dec; 13(6):507-24. PubMed ID: 15587436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluating the age to begin periodic breast cancer screening using data from a few regularly scheduled screenings.
    Baker SG
    Biometrics; 1998 Dec; 54(4):1569-78. PubMed ID: 9883553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The relation of breast cancer staging to screening protocol compliance: a computer simulation study.
    Castro F; Carter KJ; Kessler E; Erickson BA; Kseibi SA
    Comput Biol Med; 2005 Feb; 35(2):91-101. PubMed ID: 15567180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.