These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10573898)
1. Variations in the feedback of hearing aids. Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Nov; 106(5):2821-33. PubMed ID: 10573898 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Acoustic effects in in-the-ear hearing aid response: results from a computer simulation. Kates JM Ear Hear; 1988 Jun; 9(3):119-32. PubMed ID: 3410175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. System identification of feedback in hearing aids. Hellgren J; Lunner T; Arlinger S J Acoust Soc Am; 1999 Jun; 105(6):3481-96. PubMed ID: 10380671 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Room reverberation effects in hearing aid feedback cancellation. Kates JM J Acoust Soc Am; 2001 Jan; 109(1):367-78. PubMed ID: 11206165 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Attenuating the ear canal feedback pressure of a laser-driven hearing aid. Khaleghi M; Puria S J Acoust Soc Am; 2017 Mar; 141(3):1683. PubMed ID: 28372092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Simulating the open-loop transfer function as a means for understanding acoustic feedback in hearing aids. Egolf DP; Haley BT; Howell HC; Legowski S; Larson VD J Acoust Soc Am; 1989 Jan; 85(1):454-67. PubMed ID: 2921422 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum. Chung K Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Gain and feedback problems when fitting behind-the-ear hearing aids to profoundly hearing-impaired children. Dyrlund O; Lundh P Scand Audiol; 1990; 19(2):89-95. PubMed ID: 2371540 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Combined effects of earmold vents and suboscillatory feedback on hearing aid frequency response. Cox RM Ear Hear; 1982; 3(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 7060839 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A computer simulation of hearing aid response and the effects of ear canal size. Kates JM J Acoust Soc Am; 1988 May; 83(5):1952-63. PubMed ID: 3403807 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The effects of venting on in-the-ear, in-the-canal, and completely-in-the-canal hearing aid shell frequency responses: real-ear measures. Stuart A; Allen R; Downs CR; Carpenter M J Speech Lang Hear Res; 1999 Aug; 42(4):804-13. PubMed ID: 10450902 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Low body mass index and jaw movement are protective of hearing in users of personal listening devices. Li LP; Chuang AY; McMahon C; Tung TH; Chen JK Laryngoscope; 2013 Aug; 123(8):1983-7. PubMed ID: 23553325 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Maximum real-ear gain of in-the-ear hearing aids. Erickson FN; Van Tasell DJ J Speech Hear Res; 1991 Apr; 34(2):351-9. PubMed ID: 2046359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Acoustic feedback path modeling for hearing aids: Comparison of physical position based and position independent models. Sankowsky-Rothe T; Schepker H; Doclo S; Blau M J Acoust Soc Am; 2020 Jan; 147(1):85. PubMed ID: 32006989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Open Versus Closed Hearing-Aid Fittings: A Literature Review of Both Fitting Approaches. Winkler A; Latzel M; Holube I Trends Hear; 2016 Feb; 20():. PubMed ID: 26879562 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]