These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

98 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10574026)

  • 1. [Evaluating the diagnostic quality of mammography film-screen systems: a comparative study].
    Nüssle K; Görich J; Rieber A; Brambs HJ
    Rontgenpraxis; 1999; 52(5-6):178-81. PubMed ID: 10574026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Experimental investigations of image quality in X-ray mammography with conventional screen film system (SFS), digital phosphor storage plate in/without magnification technique (CR) and digital CCD-technique (CCD).
    Schulz-Wendtland R; Aichinger U; Säbel M; Böhner C; Dobritz M; Wenkel E; Bautz W
    Rontgenpraxis; 2001; 54(4):123-6. PubMed ID: 11883115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Film-screen combinations in mammography].
    Friedrich M
    Z Lymphol; 1983 Dec; 7(2):92-103. PubMed ID: 6673399
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Digital mammography.
    Feig SA; Yaffe MJ
    Radiographics; 1998; 18(4):893-901. PubMed ID: 9672974
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. [A simple technique for quality improvement of breast specimen radiography].
    Meindl S; Glöcker M
    Rontgenpraxis; 1995 Jul; 48(7):214-6. PubMed ID: 7676360
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Clinical trial of mammography with film-screen-combinations. Part 1: Selection of a suitable film-screen system].
    Säbel M; Paterok EM; Weishaar J; Willgeroth F
    Rontgenpraxis; 1981; 34(11):458-66. PubMed ID: 7313855
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [ROC analysis of image quality in digital luminescence radiography in comparison with current film-screen systems in mammography].
    Wiebringhaus R; John V; Müller RD; Hirche H; Voss M; Callies R
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1995 Jul; 5(4):263-7. PubMed ID: 7548257
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. [Capacities of digital mammography in screening].
    Belotserkovtseva LD; Klimova NV; Samatova TB; Agapova NA
    Vestn Rentgenol Radiol; 2008; (4-6):33-6. PubMed ID: 21337748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Signal-to-noise properties of mammographic film-screen systems.
    Nishikawa RM; Yaffe MJ
    Med Phys; 1985; 12(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 3974523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mammography using an ultrahigh-strip-density, stationary, focused grid.
    Dershaw DD; Masterson ME; Malik S; Cruz NM
    Radiology; 1985 Aug; 156(2):541-4. PubMed ID: 4011922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [The stationary grid in mammography: its clinical evaluation].
    Draghi F; Ferrozzi G; Ferrozzi F; Ferranti C
    Radiol Med; 1993; 85(1-2):96-102. PubMed ID: 8480057
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Detection of microcalcifications by mammography with intensifying screens].
    Gurvic AM; Katomina RW; Petrowa JJu ; Rozkova NJ; Angerstein W; Wolf M
    Radiol Diagn (Berl); 1983; 24(3):409-18. PubMed ID: 6611911
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of mammographic screen-film systems.
    Sickles EA
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():52-7. PubMed ID: 3589132
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Recent trends in screen-film mammography: technical factors and radiation dose.
    Haus AG
    Recent Results Cancer Res; 1987; 105():37-51. PubMed ID: 3296054
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Mammographic dual-screen-dual-emulsion-film combination: visibility of simulated microcalcifications and effect on image contrast.
    Kimme-Smith C; Bassett LW; Gold RH; Roe D; Orr J
    Radiology; 1987 Nov; 165(2):313-8. PubMed ID: 3310091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Implications of using high contrast mammography X-ray film-screen combinations.
    Meeson S; Young KC; Rust A; Wallis MG; Cooke J; Ramsdale ML
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 74(885):825-35. PubMed ID: 11560831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Breast imaging: a comparison of digital luminescence radiographs displayed on TV-monitor and film-screen mammography.
    Jarlman O; Borg A; Braw M; Kehler M; Lyttkens K; Samuelsson L
    Cancer Detect Prev; 1994; 18(5):375-81. PubMed ID: 7812984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Magnification mammography using 0.1 mm microfocus. Comparison of grid and spot-view magnification].
    Teubner J; Lenk JZ; Wentz KU; Georgi M
    Radiologe; 1987 Apr; 27(4):155-64. PubMed ID: 3037589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Digital image magnification mammography with the storage-screen technique. Standardized and findings-oriented image processing parameters].
    Hundertmark C; Funke M; Hermann KP; Breiter N; Grabbe E
    Aktuelle Radiol; 1997 May; 7(3):135-40. PubMed ID: 9296608
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Breast calcification and mass detection with mammographic anode-filter combinations of molybdenum, tungsten, and rhodium.
    Kimme-Smith CM; Sayre JW; McCombs MM; DeBruhl ND; Bassett LW
    Radiology; 1997 Jun; 203(3):679-83. PubMed ID: 9169688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.