215 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10575312)
1. Artificial neural networks applied to survival prediction in breast cancer.
Lundin M; Lundin J; Burke HB; Toikkanen S; Pylkkänen L; Joensuu H
Oncology; 1999 Nov; 57(4):281-6. PubMed ID: 10575312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Reasoning with uncertainty in pathology: artificial neural networks and logistic regression as tools for prediction of lymph node status in breast cancer patients.
Marchevsky AM; Shah S; Patel S
Mod Pathol; 1999 May; 12(5):505-13. PubMed ID: 10349989
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Artificial neural networks improve the accuracy of cancer survival prediction.
Burke HB; Goodman PH; Rosen DB; Henson DE; Weinstein JN; Harrell FE; Marks JR; Winchester DP; Bostwick DG
Cancer; 1997 Feb; 79(4):857-62. PubMed ID: 9024725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Prediction of nodal metastasis and prognosis in breast cancer: a neural model.
Naguib RN; Adams AE; Horne CH; Angus B; Smith AF; Sherbet GV; Lennard TW
Anticancer Res; 1997; 17(4A):2735-41. PubMed ID: 9252707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Assessment of nodal involvement and survival analysis in breast cancer patients using image cytometric data: statistical, neural network and fuzzy approaches.
Seker H; Odetayo MO; Petrovic D; Naguib RN; Bartoli C; Alasio L; Lakshmi MS; Sherbet GV
Anticancer Res; 2002; 22(1A):433-8. PubMed ID: 12017328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Artificial Neural Networks for differential diagnosis of breast lesions in MR-Mammography: a systematic approach addressing the influence of network architecture on diagnostic performance using a large clinical database.
Dietzel M; Baltzer PA; Dietzel A; Zoubi R; Gröschel T; Burmeister HP; Bogdan M; Kaiser WA
Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1508-13. PubMed ID: 21459533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Predicting the Survival of Gastric Cancer Patients Using Artificial and Bayesian Neural Networks.
Korhani Kangi A; Bahrampour A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Feb; 19(2):487-490. PubMed ID: 29480983
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Omission of histologic grading from clinical decision making may result in overuse of adjuvant therapies in breast cancer: results from a nationwide study.
Lundin J; Lundin M; Holli K; Kataja V; Elomaa L; Pylkkänen L; Turpeenniemi-Hujanen T; Joensuu H
J Clin Oncol; 2001 Jan; 19(1):28-36. PubMed ID: 11134192
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A prognostic model that makes quantitative estimates of probability of relapse for breast cancer patients.
De Laurentiis M; De Placido S; Bianco AR; Clark GM; Ravdin PM
Clin Cancer Res; 1999 Dec; 5(12):4133-9. PubMed ID: 10632351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prediction of nodal metastasis and prognosis of breast cancer by ANN-based assessment of tumour size and p53, Ki-67 and steroid receptor expression.
Mojarad S; Venturini B; Fulgenzi P; Papaleo R; Brisigotti M; Monti F; Canuti D; Ravaioli A; Woo L; Dlay S; Sherbet GV
Anticancer Res; 2013 Sep; 33(9):3925-33. PubMed ID: 24023330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the performance of log-logistic regression and artificial neural networks for predicting breast cancer relapse.
Faradmal J; Soltanian AR; Roshanaei G; Khodabakhshi R; Kasaeian A
Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2014; 15(14):5883-8. PubMed ID: 25081718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Artificial neural networks for predicting failure to survive following in-hospital cardiopulmonary resuscitation.
Ebell MH
J Fam Pract; 1993 Mar; 36(3):297-303. PubMed ID: 8454976
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Analysis of image cytometry data of fine needle aspirated cells of breast cancer patients: a comparison between logistic regression and artificial neural networks.
Mat-Sakim HA; Naguib RN; Lakshmi MS; Wadehra V; Lennard TW; Bhatavdekar J; Sherbet GV
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(4A):2723-6. PubMed ID: 9703935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Prognostic accuracy of an artificial neural network in patients undergoing radical cystectomy for bladder cancer: a comparison with logistic regression analysis.
Bassi P; Sacco E; De Marco V; Aragona M; Volpe A
BJU Int; 2007 May; 99(5):1007-12. PubMed ID: 17437435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Use of artificial neural networks to predict surgical satisfaction in patients with lumbar spinal canal stenosis: clinical article.
Azimi P; Benzel EC; Shahzadi S; Azhari S; Mohammadi HR
J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Mar; 20(3):300-5. PubMed ID: 24438428
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. An artificial neural network for prostate cancer staging when serum prostate specific antigen is 10 ng./ml. or less.
Zlotta AR; Remzi M; Snow PB; Schulman CC; Marberger M; Djavan B
J Urol; 2003 May; 169(5):1724-8. PubMed ID: 12686818
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Machine learning models in breast cancer survival prediction.
Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Montazeri M; Beigzadeh A
Technol Health Care; 2016; 24(1):31-42. PubMed ID: 26409558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Effect of patient history data on the prediction of breast cancer from mammographic findings with artificial neural networks.
Lo JY; Baker JA; Kornguth PJ; Floyd CE
Acad Radiol; 1999 Jan; 6(1):10-5. PubMed ID: 9891147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Artificial neural network models for prediction of acute coronary syndromes using clinical data from the time of presentation.
Harrison RF; Kennedy RL
Ann Emerg Med; 2005 Nov; 46(5):431-9. PubMed ID: 16271675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Relationship of clinical and pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy and outcome of locally advanced breast cancer.
Gajdos C; Tartter PI; Estabrook A; Gistrak MA; Jaffer S; Bleiweiss IJ
J Surg Oncol; 2002 May; 80(1):4-11. PubMed ID: 11967899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
