114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10576259)
1. Nodal shape (S/L) and its combination with size for assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: which cut-off should be used?
Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F; Brown B; Metreweli C
Ultrasound Med Biol; 1999 Oct; 25(8):1169-75. PubMed ID: 10576259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Diagnostic accuracy of sonographic criteria for evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Ahuja A; Metreweli C
J Ultrasound Med; 1998 Jul; 17(7):437-45. PubMed ID: 9669302
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Sonographic assessment of cervical lymphadenopathy: role of high-resolution and color Doppler imaging.
Gupta A; Rahman K; Shahid M; Kumar A; Qaseem SM; Hassan SA; Siddiqui FA
Head Neck; 2011 Mar; 33(3):297-302. PubMed ID: 20652889
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cervical lymphadenopathy: ratio of long- to short-axis diameter as a predictor of malignancy.
Steinkamp HJ; Cornehl M; Hosten N; Pegios W; Vogl T; Felix R
Br J Radiol; 1995 Mar; 68(807):266-70. PubMed ID: 7735765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Gray-scale sonographic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy in cat-scratch disease.
Ridder GJ; Richter B; Disko U; Sander A
J Clin Ultrasound; 2001; 29(3):140-5. PubMed ID: 11329156
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Usefulness of Doppler waveform analysis in differential diagnosis of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Brnić Z; Hebrang A
Eur Radiol; 2003 Jan; 13(1):175-80. PubMed ID: 12541127
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Diagnostic Accuracy of Computer-Aided Assessment of Intranodal Vascularity in Distinguishing Different Causes of Cervical Lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Cheng SC; Ahuja AT
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Aug; 42(8):2010-6. PubMed ID: 27131839
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Value of Ultrasound Elastography in the Differential Diagnosis of Cervical Lymph Nodes: A Comparative Study With B-mode and Color Doppler Sonography.
Acu L; Oktar SÖ; Acu R; Yücel C; Cebeci S
J Ultrasound Med; 2016 Nov; 35(11):2491-2499. PubMed ID: 27794132
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Preliminary Evaluation of Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification for Differential Diagnosis of Metastatic and Nonmetastatic Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Zhao Y; Xi J; Zhao B; Xiong W; Jiang D; Yang L; Cai Z; Liu T; Jiang H; Rong S; Jin X
J Ultrasound Med; 2017 Mar; 36(3):557-563. PubMed ID: 28127781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Initial experience of acoustic radiation force impulse ultrasound imaging of cervical lymph nodes.
Meng W; Xing P; Chen Q; Wu C
Eur J Radiol; 2013 Oct; 82(10):1788-92. PubMed ID: 23820176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Accuracy of sonographic vascular features in differentiating different causes of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Ying M; Ahuja A; Brook F
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2004 Apr; 30(4):441-7. PubMed ID: 15121245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Pre-operative evaluation of cervical adenopathies in tumours of the upper aerodigestive tract.
Giancarlo T; Palmieri A; Giacomarra V; Russolo M
Anticancer Res; 1998; 18(4B):2805-9. PubMed ID: 9713465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Normal head and neck lymph nodes in the paediatric population.
Alves Rosa J; Calle-Toro JS; Kidd M; Andronikou S
Clin Radiol; 2021 Apr; 76(4):315.e1-315.e7. PubMed ID: 33558027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Shear Wave Elastography in Head and Neck Lymph Node Assessment: Image Quality and Diagnostic Impact Compared with B-Mode and Doppler Ultrasonography.
Desmots F; Fakhry N; Mancini J; Reyre A; Vidal V; Jacquier A; Santini L; Moulin G; Varoquaux A
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):387-98. PubMed ID: 26617244
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ultrasonography of abnormal neck lymph nodes.
Chan JM; Shin LK; Jeffrey RB
Ultrasound Q; 2007 Mar; 23(1):47-54. PubMed ID: 17558229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Real-time and computerized sonographic scoring system for predicting malignant cervical lymphadenopathy.
Liao LJ; Wang CT; Young YH; Cheng PW
Head Neck; 2010 May; 32(5):594-8. PubMed ID: 19693943
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ultrasonic evaluation of cervical lymphadenopathy.
Chang DB; Yang PC; Luh KT; Wu HD; Lee LN; Kuo SH; Lee YC
J Formos Med Assoc; 1990 Apr; 89(4):286-92. PubMed ID: 1976745
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Virtual Touch Tissue Imaging Quantification Shear Wave Elastography: Prospective Assessment of Cervical Lymph Nodes.
Cheng KL; Choi YJ; Shim WH; Lee JH; Baek JH
Ultrasound Med Biol; 2016 Feb; 42(2):378-86. PubMed ID: 26553206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predicting malignant neck lymphadenopathy using color duplex sonography based on multivariate analysis.
Chammas MC; Macedo TA; Lo VW; Gomes AC; Juliano A; Cerri GG
J Clin Ultrasound; 2016 Nov; 44(9):587-594. PubMed ID: 27492569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Measurable and Unmeasurable Features of Ultrasound Lymph Node Images in Detection of Malignant Infiltration.
Rotim T; Kristek B; Turk T; Kretić D; Perić M; Pušeljić I; Pandurović T; Štefanić M
Acta Clin Croat; 2017 Sep; 56(3):415-424. PubMed ID: 29479907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
