These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10576949)
1. Shock-induced figure-of-eight reentry in the isolated rabbit heart. Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE; Smith WM Circ Res; 1999 Oct; 85(8):742-52. PubMed ID: 10576949 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T-wave field-shocks in the isolated perfused rabbit heart: role of nonuniform shock responses. Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Behrens S; Franz MR Basic Res Cardiol; 1997 Feb; 92(1):35-44. PubMed ID: 9062650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Myocardial vulnerability to T wave shocks: relation to shock strength, shock coupling interval, and dispersion of ventricular repolarization. Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Behrens S; Zabel M; Franz MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1996 Mar; 7(3):231-42. PubMed ID: 8867297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of shock strength and timing on induction of ventricular arrhythmias in dogs. Shibata N; Chen PS; Dixon EG; Wolf PD; Danieley ND; Smith WM; Ideker RE Am J Physiol; 1988 Oct; 255(4 Pt 2):H891-901. PubMed ID: 3177678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Shock-induced dispersion of ventricular repolarization: implications for the induction of ventricular fibrillation and the upper limit of vulnerability. Behrens S; Li C; Fabritz CL; Kirchhof PF; Franz MR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 1997 Sep; 8(9):998-1008. PubMed ID: 9300297 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effect of shock-induced changes in transmembrane potential on reentrant waves and outcome during cardioversion of isolated rabbit hearts. Evans FG; Ideker RE; Gray RA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2002 Nov; 13(11):1118-27. PubMed ID: 12475103 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Shock-induced epicardial and endocardial virtual electrodes leading to ventricular fibrillation via reentry, graded responses, and transmural activation. Evans FG; Gray RA J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2004 Jan; 15(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 15028078 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Induction of ventricular fibrillation by T wave shocks: observations from monophasic action potential recordings. Shepard RK; Wood MA; Dan D; Clemo HF; Gilligan DM; Ellenbogen KA J Interv Card Electrophysiol; 1999 Dec; 3(4):335-40. PubMed ID: 10525249 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Prolongation of repolarization time by electric field stimulation with monophasic and biphasic shocks in open-chest dogs. Zhou XH; Knisley SB; Wolf PD; Rollins DL; Smith WM; Ideker RE Circ Res; 1991 Jun; 68(6):1761-7. PubMed ID: 2036724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reversal of repolarization gradient does not reverse the chirality of shock-induced reentry in the rabbit heart. Cheng Y; Nikolski V; Efimov IR J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2000 Sep; 11(9):998-1007. PubMed ID: 11021470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Optical mapping of ventricular defibrillation in isolated swine right ventricles: demonstration of a postshock isoelectric window after near-threshold defibrillation shocks. Wang NC; Lee MH; Ohara T; Okuyama Y; Fishbein GA; Lin SF; Karagueuzian HS; Chen PS Circulation; 2001 Jul; 104(2):227-33. PubMed ID: 11447091 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of shock strengths on ventricular defibrillation failure. Chattipakorn N; Banville I; Gray RA; Ideker RE Cardiovasc Res; 2004 Jan; 61(1):39-44. PubMed ID: 14732200 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Characterization of the relationship between preshock state and virtual electrode polarization-induced propagated graded responses resulting in arrhythmia induction. Bourn DW; Gray RA; Trayanova NA Heart Rhythm; 2006 May; 3(5):583-95. PubMed ID: 16648066 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effects of atrial defibrillation shocks on the ventricles in isolated sheep hearts. Gray RA; Jalife J Circulation; 1998 Apr; 97(16):1613-22. PubMed ID: 9593567 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The vulnerable period for low and high energy T-wave shocks: role of dispersion of repolarisation and effect of d-sotalol. Kirchhof PF; Fabritz CL; Zabel M; Franz MR Cardiovasc Res; 1996 Jun; 31(6):953-62. PubMed ID: 8759252 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The mechanisms of the vulnerable window: the role of virtual electrodes and shock polarity. Yamanouchi Y; Cheng Y; Tchou PJ; Efimov IR Can J Physiol Pharmacol; 2001 Jan; 79(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 11201498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Optical recordings of the effect of electrical stimulation on action potential repolarization and the induction of reentry in two-dimensional perfused rabbit epicardium. Knisley SB; Hill BC Circulation; 1993 Nov; 88(5 Pt 1):2402-14. PubMed ID: 8222133 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Pacing after shocks stronger than the upper limit of vulnerability: impact on fibrillation induction. Chattipakorn N; Fotuhi PC; Sreenan CM; White JB; Ideker RE Circulation; 2000 Mar; 101(11):1337-43. PubMed ID: 10725296 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]