These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
100 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10580961)
1. Size of colorectal liver metastases at abdominal CT: comparison of precontrast and postcontrast studies. Nazarian LN; Park JH; Halpern EJ; Parker L; Johnson PT; Lev-Toaff AS; Wechsler RJ Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):825-30. PubMed ID: 10580961 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of unenhanced and contrast-enhanced spiral CT for assessing interval change in patients with colorectal liver metastases. Park JH; Nazarian LN; Halpern EJ; Feld RI; Lev-Toaff AS; Parker L; Wechsler RJ Acad Radiol; 2001 Aug; 8(8):698-704. PubMed ID: 11508748 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hepatic enhancement and metastatic lesion conspicuity on CT scans: influence of intravenous glucagon and oral CT contrast material. Warshauer DM; Wehmueller MD; Molina PL; Muller KE; DeLuca MC; Lee JK Radiology; 1997 Feb; 202(2):394-8. PubMed ID: 9015064 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Colorectal cancer: diagnostic potential of CT measurements of hepatic perfusion and implications for contrast enhancement protocols. Leggett DA; Kelley BB; Bunce IH; Miles KA Radiology; 1997 Dec; 205(3):716-20. PubMed ID: 9393526 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. CT evaluation of suspected hepatic metastases: comparison of techniques for i.v. contrast enhancement. Paushter DM; Zeman RK; Scheibler ML; Choyke PL; Jaffe MH; Clark LR AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1989 Feb; 152(2):267-71. PubMed ID: 2783503 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Efficacy and safety of MR imaging with liver-specific contrast agent: U.S. multicenter phase III study. Bluemke DA; Sahani D; Amendola M; Balzer T; Breuer J; Brown JJ; Casalino DD; Davis PL; Francis IR; Krinsky G; Lee FT; Lu D; Paulson EK; Schwartz LH; Siegelman ES; Small WC; Weber TM; Welber A; Shamsi K Radiology; 2005 Oct; 237(1):89-98. PubMed ID: 16126918 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Dual phase helical CT versus portal venous phase CT for the detection of colorectal liver metastases: correlation with intra-operative sonography, surgical and pathological findings. Scott DJ; Guthrie JA; Arnold P; Ward J; Atchley J; Wilson D; Robinson PJ Clin Radiol; 2001 Mar; 56(3):235-42. PubMed ID: 11247703 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Liver lesions: improved detection with dual-detector-array CT and routine 2.5-mm thin collimation. Weg N; Scheer MR; Gabor MP Radiology; 1998 Nov; 209(2):417-26. PubMed ID: 9807568 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Distinction between cavernous hemangiomas of the liver and hepatic metastases on CT: value of contrast enhancement patterns. Leslie DF; Johnson CD; Johnson CM; Ilstrup DM; Harmsen WS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):625-9. PubMed ID: 7863883 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Conspicuity of hepatic metastases on helical CT: effect of different time delays between contrast administration and scanning. Silverman PM; O'Malley J; Tefft MC; Cooper C; Zeman RK AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Mar; 164(3):619-23. PubMed ID: 7863882 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Contrast enhancement of hepatic tumors in CT: comparison between bolus and infusion techniques. Burgener FA; Hamlin DJ AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1983 Feb; 140(2):291-5. PubMed ID: 6600346 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Role of IV iodinated contrast material in 18F-FDG PET/CT of liver metastases. Badiee S; Franc BL; Webb EM; Chu B; Hawkins RA; Coakley F; Singer L AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2008 Nov; 191(5):1436-9. PubMed ID: 18941082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Liver metastases from melanoma: detection with multiphasic contrast-enhanced CT. Blake SP; Weisinger K; Atkins MB; Raptopoulos V Radiology; 1999 Oct; 213(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 10540646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Single-pass CT of hepatic tumors: value of globular enhancement in distinguishing hemangiomas from hypervascular metastases. Leslie DF; Johnson CD; MacCarty RL; Ward EM; Ilstrup DM; Harmsen WS AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Dec; 165(6):1403-6. PubMed ID: 7484574 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Increased detectability of liver metastases by the use of contrast enhancement in computed tomography. A comparison between the precontrast, the immediate postcontrast and the one hour postcontrast scan. Sager EM; Scheel B; Talle K Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1985; 26(4):369-72. PubMed ID: 3901677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Multi-detector row helical CT in preoperative assessment of small (< or = 1.5 cm) liver metastases: is thinner collimation better? Haider MA; Amitai MM; Rappaport DC; O'Malley ME; Hanbidge AE; Redston M; Lockwood GA; Gallinger S Radiology; 2002 Oct; 225(1):137-42. PubMed ID: 12354997 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Use of contrast material for spiral CT of the abdomen: comparison of hepatic enhancement and vascular attenuation for three different contrast media at two different delay times. Herts BR; Paushter DM; Einstein DM; Zepp R; Friedman RA; Obuchowski N AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1995 Feb; 164(2):327-31. PubMed ID: 7839963 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Hepatocellular carcinoma: evaluation with biphasic, contrast-enhanced, helical CT. Baron RL; Oliver JH; Dodd GD; Nalesnik M; Holbert BL; Carr B Radiology; 1996 May; 199(2):505-11. PubMed ID: 8668803 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. CT arterial portography of the abdomen: effect of injecting papaverine into the mesenteric artery on hepatic contrast enhancement. Soyer P; Lacheheb D; Levesque M AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1993 Jun; 160(6):1213-5. PubMed ID: 8498218 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [CT arterioportography in the spiral technic for the demonstration of liver metastases]. Helmberger H; Bautz W; Vogel U; Lenz M Rofo; 1993 May; 158(5):410-5. PubMed ID: 8490148 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]