361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10580971)
1. Benign versus malignant solid breast masses: US differentiation.
Rahbar G; Sie AC; Hansen GC; Prince JS; Melany ML; Reynolds HE; Jackson VP; Sayre JW; Bassett LW
Radiology; 1999 Dec; 213(3):889-94. PubMed ID: 10580971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ultrasound differentiation of benign versus malignant solid breast masses.
Murad M; Bari V
J Coll Physicians Surg Pak; 2004 Mar; 14(3):166-9. PubMed ID: 15228851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Contribution of ultrasonography and fine-needle aspiration cytology to the differential diagnosis of palpable solid breast lesions.
Reinikainen HT; Rissanen TJ; Piippo UK; Päivänsalo MJ
Acta Radiol; 1999 Jul; 40(4):383-9. PubMed ID: 10394865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Preoperative wire localisation of breast lesions by tissue harmonic imaging (THI) sonography].
Jung EM; Clevert DA; Lutz R; Kett H; Rupp N
Rofo; 2002 Sep; 174(9):1121-5. PubMed ID: 12221570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Aliasing artifact depicted on ultrasound (US)-elastography for breast cystic lesions mimicking solid masses.
Cho N; Moon WK; Chang JM; Kim SJ; Lyou CY; Choi HY
Acta Radiol; 2011 Feb; 52(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 21498318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Diagnostic value of breast ultrasound in mammography BI-RADS 0 and clinically indeterminate or suspicious of malignancy breast lesions.
Dobrosavljević A; Rakić S; Nikoli B; Raznatović SJ; Dikić SD; Milosević Z; Jurisić A; Skrobić M
Vojnosanit Pregl; 2016 Mar; 73(3):239-45. PubMed ID: 27295907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Multicenter study of ultrasound real-time tissue elastography in 779 cases for the assessment of breast lesions: improved diagnostic performance by combining the BI-RADS®-US classification system with sonoelastography.
Wojcinski S; Farrokh A; Weber S; Thomas A; Fischer T; Slowinski T; Schmidt W; Degenhardt F
Ultraschall Med; 2010 Oct; 31(5):484-91. PubMed ID: 20408116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. [Sonographic criteria for the differentiation of benign and malignant breast lesions using real-time spatial compound imaging in combination with XRES adaptive image processing].
Hahn M; Roessner L; Krainick-Strobel U; Gruber IV; Krämer B; Gall C; Siegmann KC; Wallwiener D; Kagan KO
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Jun; 33(3):270-4. PubMed ID: 20614412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Automated breast ultrasound: lesion detection and BI-RADS classification--a pilot study.
Wenkel E; Heckmann M; Heinrich M; Schwab SA; Uder M; Schulz-Wendtland R; Bautz WA; Janka R
Rofo; 2008 Sep; 180(9):804-8. PubMed ID: 18704878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of conventional and automated breast volume ultrasound in the description and characterization of solid breast masses based on BI-RADS features.
Kim H; Cha JH; Oh HY; Kim HH; Shin HJ; Chae EY
Breast Cancer; 2014 Jul; 21(4):423-8. PubMed ID: 23086698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Significant differentiation of focal breast lesions: raw data-based calculation of strain ratio.
Fischer T; Peisker U; Fiedor S; Slowinski T; Wedemeyer P; Diekmann F; Grigoryev M; Thomas A
Ultraschall Med; 2012 Aug; 33(4):372-9. PubMed ID: 21614749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Radiologists' performance in the detection of benign and malignant masses with 3D automated breast ultrasound (ABUS).
Chang JM; Moon WK; Cho N; Park JS; Kim SJ
Eur J Radiol; 2011 Apr; 78(1):99-103. PubMed ID: 21330080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Surgical office-based ultrasound of the breast.
Staren ED
Am Surg; 1995 Jul; 61(7):619-26; discussion 627. PubMed ID: 7793744
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Masses in breasts with implants: diagnosis with US-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy.
Fornage BD; Sneige N; Singletary SE
Radiology; 1994 May; 191(2):339-42. PubMed ID: 8153303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Fast 3D Near-infrared breast imaging using indocyanine green for detection and characterization of breast lesions.
Schneider P; Piper S; Schmitz CH; Schreiter NF; Volkwein N; Lüdemann L; Malzahn U; Poellinger A
Rofo; 2011 Oct; 183(10):956-63. PubMed ID: 21972043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. US of mammographically detected clustered microcalcifications.
Moon WK; Im JG; Koh YH; Noh DY; Park IA
Radiology; 2000 Dec; 217(3):849-54. PubMed ID: 11110953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Pivotal Study of Optoacoustic Imaging to Diagnose Benign and Malignant Breast Masses: A New Evaluation Tool for Radiologists.
Neuschler EI; Butler R; Young CA; Barke LD; Bertrand ML; Böhm-Vélez M; Destounis S; Donlan P; Grobmyer SR; Katzen J; Kist KA; Lavin PT; Makariou EV; Parris TM; Schilling KJ; Tucker FL; Dogan BE
Radiology; 2018 May; 287(2):398-412. PubMed ID: 29178816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. [Papillary lesions of the breast: diagnostic imaging and contribution of percutaneous needle biopsy with 14G needle].
Bazzocchi M; Berra I; Francescutti GE; Del Frate C; Zuiani C; Puglisi F; Di Loreto C
Radiol Med; 2001 Jun; 101(6):424-31. PubMed ID: 11479438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multivariate analysis of roentgenologic characteristics and risk factors for nonpalpable carcinoma of the breast.
Harkins K; Tartter PI; Hermann G; Squitieri R; Brower ST; Keller RJ
J Am Coll Surg; 1994 Feb; 178(2):149-54. PubMed ID: 8173725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Evaluation of the primary diagnosis with a CAD-system in mammography].
Malich A; Vogel D; Facius M; Marx C; Freesmeyer MG; Sauner D; Hansch A; Pfleiderer SO; Fleck M; Kaiser WA
Rofo; 2003 Sep; 175(9):1225-31. PubMed ID: 12964078
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
