361 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10580971)
41. Effects of a microbubble contrast agent on breast tumors: computer-assisted quantitative assessment with color Doppler US--early experience.
Huber S; Helbich T; Kettenbach J; Dock W; Zuna I; Delorme S
Radiology; 1998 Aug; 208(2):485-9. PubMed ID: 9680580
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. The accuracy of breast ultrasound in the evaluation of clinically benign discrete, symptomatic breast lumps.
Lister D; Evans AJ; Burrell HC; Blamey RW; Wilson AR; Pinder SE; Ellis IO; Elston CW; Kollias J
Clin Radiol; 1998 Jul; 53(7):490-2. PubMed ID: 9714387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Comparison of fine needle aspiration cytology and excisional biopsy in palpable breast cancers.
Müslümanoğlu M; Dolay K; Ozmen V; Iğci A; Bozfakioğlu Y
Radiol Med; 1995 Mar; 89(3):225-8. PubMed ID: 7754112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Mammographically detected breast lesions: clinical importance of cytologic atypia in stereotaxic fine-needle aspiration biopsy samples.
Mitnick JS; Vazquez MF; Feiner HD; Pressman P; Roses DF
Radiology; 1996 Feb; 198(2):319-22. PubMed ID: 8596824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Complicated breast cysts on sonography: is aspiration necessary to exclude malignancy?
Daly CP; Bailey JE; Klein KA; Helvie MA
Acad Radiol; 2008 May; 15(5):610-7. PubMed ID: 18423318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Differentiation of benign from malignant solid breast masses: conventional US versus spatial compound imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Chung SY; Park SH; Park JM; Han BK; Choe YH; Cho G; Im JG
Radiology; 2005 Dec; 237(3):841-6. PubMed ID: 16304106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Observer variability and applicability of BI-RADS terminology for breast MR imaging: invasive carcinomas as focal masses.
Kim SJ; Morris EA; Liberman L; Ballon DJ; La Trenta LR; Hadar O; Abramson A; Dershaw DD
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2001 Sep; 177(3):551-7. PubMed ID: 11517046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Tubulolobular carcinoma of the breast: clinical, mammographic and sonographic findings.
Günhan-Bilgen I; Oktay A
Eur J Radiol; 2006 Dec; 60(3):418-24. PubMed ID: 16916593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Characterization of benign and malignant solid breast masses: comparison of conventional US and tissue harmonic imaging.
Cha JH; Moon WK; Cho N; Kim SM; Park SH; Han BK; Choe YH; Park JM; Im JG
Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):63-9. PubMed ID: 17090709
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Focal fibrosis: a common breast lesion diagnosed at imaging-guided core biopsy.
Rosen EL; Soo MS; Bentley RC
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1657-62. PubMed ID: 10584816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. [The diagnostic role of breast echography].
Ciatto S; Rosselli del Turco M; Catarzi S; Morrone D; Bonardi R
Radiol Med; 1994 Sep; 88(3):221-4. PubMed ID: 7938725
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Focal fibrosis of the breast: imaging characteristics and histopathologic correlation.
Revelon G; Sherman ME; Gatewood OM; Brem RF
Radiology; 2000 Jul; 216(1):255-9. PubMed ID: 10887257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Stereotactic, automated, large-core needle biopsy of nonpalpable breast lesions: false-negative and histologic underestimation rates after long-term follow-up.
Jackman RJ; Nowels KW; Rodriguez-Soto J; Marzoni FA; Finkelstein SI; Shepard MJ
Radiology; 1999 Mar; 210(3):799-805. PubMed ID: 10207484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Multiple Bilateral Circumscribed Masses at Screening Breast Ultrasound: Outcomes of New or Enlarging Masses at Follow-Up.
Wolfson S; Heller SL; Gao Y
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Mar; 218(3):435-443. PubMed ID: 34549605
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. A prospective study about abnormal ductal dilatations without associated masses on breast US: what is the significance for us?
Song SE; Yie A; Seo BK; Lee SH; Cho KR; Woo OH; Lee KY; Kim YS
Acad Radiol; 2012 Mar; 19(3):296-302. PubMed ID: 22173322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. The current role of ultrasonography in breast imaging.
Jackson VP
Radiol Clin North Am; 1995 Nov; 33(6):1161-70. PubMed ID: 7480663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Contrast-enhanced ultrasonography in diagnosis of benign and malignant breast lesions.
Wang XY; Kang LK; Lan CY
Eur J Gynaecol Oncol; 2014; 35(4):415-20. PubMed ID: 25118483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Analysis of sonographic features in the differentiation of fibroadenoma and invasive ductal carcinoma.
Skaane P; Engedal K
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):109-14. PubMed ID: 9423610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Breast masses with mixed cystic-solid sonographic appearance.
Omori LM; Hisa N; Ohkuma K; Fujikura Y; Hiramatsu K; Enomoto I; Ikeda T; Mukai M
J Clin Ultrasound; 1993 Oct; 21(8):489-95. PubMed ID: 8270665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Ultrasonography as adjunct to mammography in the evaluation of breast tumors.
Skaane P
Acta Radiol Suppl; 1999; 420():1-47. PubMed ID: 10693544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
