These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10581812)

  • 1. Radiographic techniques.
    Floyd P; Palmer P; Palmer R
    Br Dent J; 1999 Oct; 187(7):359-65. PubMed ID: 10581812
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Planning for implant placement.
    Shepard WK; Ducar JP; London RM
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 1995 Mar; 23(3):14-8. PubMed ID: 7673992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Diagnostic imaging for dental implant assessment.
    Benson BW
    Tex Dent J; 1995 Feb; 112(2):37-41. PubMed ID: 8633304
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Radiographic diagnosis in periodontics.
    Jeffcoat MK; Wang IC; Reddy MS
    Periodontol 2000; 1995 Feb; 7():54-68. PubMed ID: 9567930
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Radiographic determinants of implant performance.
    Reddy MS; Wang IC
    Adv Dent Res; 1999 Jun; 13():136-45. PubMed ID: 11276736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison of two-dimensional orthoradially reformatted computed tomography and panoramic radiography for dental implant treatment planning.
    Lam EW; Ruprecht A; Yang J
    J Prosthet Dent; 1995 Jul; 74(1):42-6. PubMed ID: 7674189
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Radiodiagnostic evaluation in osseointegrated dental implants].
    Andreoli GL; Di Maggio A; Sanna C
    Stomatol Mediterr; 1991; 11(2):119-23. PubMed ID: 1925767
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Linear tomography in conjunction with pantomography in the assessment of dental implant recipient sites.
    Silverstein LH; Melkonian RW; Kurtzman D; Garnick JJ; Lefkove MD
    J Oral Implantol; 1994; 20(2):111-7. PubMed ID: 7869413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimation of the possibility to treat the edentulous maxilla with osseointegrated implants.
    Petersson A; Lindh C; Carlsson LE
    Swed Dent J; 1992; 16(1-2):1-6. PubMed ID: 1579883
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Panoramic and tomographic dimensional determinations for maxillary osseointegrated implants. Comparison of the morphologic information potential of two and three dimensional radiographic systems.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S
    Swed Dent J; 1995; 19(1-2):65-71. PubMed ID: 7597633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Preimplant radiographic assessment of available maxillary bone support. Comparison of tomographic and panoramic technique.
    Fredholm U; Bolin A; Andersson L
    Swed Dent J; 1993; 17(3):103-9. PubMed ID: 8356535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dental implant treatment planning with reformatted computed tomography.
    Besimo C; Lambrecht JT; Nidecker A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):264-7. PubMed ID: 9161173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Relationship between subsinus bone height and bone volume requirements for dental implants: a human radiographic study.
    Kopecka D; Simunek A; Brazda T; Rota M; Slezak R; Capek L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2012; 27(1):48-54. PubMed ID: 22299078
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Radiography of the mandible prior to endosseous implant treatment. Localization of the mandibular canal and assessment of trabecular bone.
    Lindh C
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1996; 112():1-45. PubMed ID: 8782328
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The accuracy of alveolar crest dimensions measurement for dental implants. In vitro study.
    Hedeşiu M; Balog C; Preda DM; Băciuţ G; Băciuţ M; Fildan F; Pop A; Maier M
    Rev Med Chir Soc Med Nat Iasi; 2008; 112(1):224-8. PubMed ID: 18677931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preoperative radiologic planning of implant surgery in compromised patients.
    Jacobs R
    Periodontol 2000; 2003; 33():12-25. PubMed ID: 12950838
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Sensitivity and specificity of radiographic methods for predicting insertion torque of dental implants.
    Cortes AR; Eimar H; Barbosa Jde S; Costa C; Arita ES; Tamimi F
    J Periodontol; 2015 May; 86(5):646-55. PubMed ID: 25594426
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A dual-purpose stent for the implant-supported prosthesis.
    Verde MA; Morgano SM
    J Prosthet Dent; 1993 Mar; 69(3):276-80. PubMed ID: 8445558
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The incisive canal. Considerations during implant placement: case report and literature review.
    Romanos GE; Greenstein G
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2009; 24(4):740-5. PubMed ID: 19885417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A case for routine computed tomography imaging of the dental alveolus before implant placement.
    Kraut RA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2001 Jan; 59(1):64-7. PubMed ID: 11152191
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.