These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

135 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10581812)

  • 21. A tomographic technique for the depiction of atrophied alveolar ridges prior to endosseous implant placement.
    Weingart D; Düker J
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1993 Feb; 22(1):38-40. PubMed ID: 8508941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Radiologic measurements of the mandible: a comparison between CT-reformatted and conventional tomographic images.
    Hanazawa T; Sano T; Seki K; Okano T
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2004 Apr; 15(2):226-32. PubMed ID: 15008935
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Radiographic evaluation of mandibular posterior implant sites: correlation between panoramic and tomographic determinations.
    Bolin A; Eliasson S; von Beetzen M; Jansson L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 1996 Dec; 7(4):354-9. PubMed ID: 9151602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. [Pre-implantation evaluation using medical imagery: scanner or Scanora?].
    Hanssens JF
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 1996; 51(2):101-10. PubMed ID: 9289749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The influence of healing type on marginal bone levels of implants supporting mandibular overdentures: a randomized clinical study.
    Mumcu E; Bilhan H; Geckili O
    Indian J Dent Res; 2012; 23(4):514-8. PubMed ID: 23257488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A nonradiologic method for estimating bone volume for dental implant placement in the completely edentulous arch.
    Flanagan D
    J Oral Implantol; 2001; 27(3):115-7. PubMed ID: 12500868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Fabrication of a guide for nonradiographic evaluation of bone contour.
    Kaminishi R
    J Prosthet Dent; 1998 Feb; 79(2):241. PubMed ID: 9547138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. A comparison of panoramic radiography with computed tomography in the planning of implant surgery.
    Tal H; Moses O
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1991 Feb; 20(1):40-2. PubMed ID: 1884852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Radiographic techniques for presurgical assessment of dental implant sites.
    Kassebaum DK; Stoller NH; Goshorn BI
    Gen Dent; 1992; 40(6):502-5, 509-10. PubMed ID: 1298675
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Bilaminar dual-purpose stent for placement of dental implants.
    Cehreli MC; Aslan Y; Sahin S
    J Prosthet Dent; 2000 Jul; 84(1):55-8. PubMed ID: 10898843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. CT data and its CAD and CAM utility in implant planning: part I.
    Voitik AJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2002; 28(6):302-3. PubMed ID: 12498541
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Effective uses of radiographs for implant placements--panographs, cephalograms, CT scans.
    Kraut RA
    Dent Implantol Update; 1993 Apr; 4(4):29-33. PubMed ID: 8298153
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Imaging of dental implants in severely resorbed maxillae using detailed narrow-beam radiography. A methodological study.
    Svenson B; Palmqvist S
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1996 Apr; 25(2):67-70. PubMed ID: 9446975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Use of radiographs in evaluating success, stability and failure in implant dentistry.
    Brägger U
    Periodontol 2000; 1998 Jun; 17():77-88. PubMed ID: 10337315
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Classification of the alveolar ridge width: implant-driven treatment considerations for the horizontally deficient alveolar ridges.
    Tolstunov L
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Jul; 40 Spec No():365-70. PubMed ID: 24575743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of interimplant distances and placement depth on papilla formation and crestal resorption: a clinical and radiographic study in dogs.
    Novaes AB; Barros RR; Muglia VA; Borges GJ
    J Oral Implantol; 2009; 35(1):18-27. PubMed ID: 19288884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Fabricating radiographic stents in implant treatment planning.
    Fondriest JF; McClenahan DC
    CDS Rev; 1997; 90(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 9594711
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Use of acetate transfer-enhanced stents in implant diagnosis and treatment.
    Valenti DE
    Dent Today; 1995 Mar; 14(3):62, 64-5, 68 passim. PubMed ID: 9540542
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Radiographic evaluation of marginal bone levels adjacent to parallel-screw cylinder machined-neck implants and rough-surfaced microthreaded implants using digitized panoramic radiographs.
    Nickenig HJ; Wichmann M; Schlegel KA; Nkenke E; Eitner S
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 Jun; 20(6):550-4. PubMed ID: 19302236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Efficacy of panoramic radiographs in the preoperative planning of posterior mandibular implants: a prospective clinical study of 1527 consecutively treated patients.
    Vazquez L; Saulacic N; Belser U; Bernard JP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2008 Jan; 19(1):81-5. PubMed ID: 17956572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.