These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10582359)

  • 1. A reevaluation of the sex prediction accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter for modern individuals.
    Stojanowski CM; Seidemann RM
    J Forensic Sci; 1999 Nov; 44(6):1215-8. PubMed ID: 10582359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Reexamination of a measurement for sexual determination using the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a modern European population.
    Alunni-Perret V; Staccini P; Quatrehomme G
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):517-20. PubMed ID: 12762520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Brief communication: Sex determination accuracy of the minimum supero-inferior femoral neck diameter in a contemporary rural Guatemalan population.
    Frutos LR
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2003 Oct; 122(2):123-6. PubMed ID: 12949832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The use of the supero-inferior femoral neck diameter as a sex assessor.
    Seidemann RM; Stojanowski CM; Doran GH
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1998 Nov; 107(3):305-13. PubMed ID: 9821495
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sexing potential of fragmentary and pathological metacarpals.
    Stojanowski CM
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1999 Jun; 109(2):245-52. PubMed ID: 10378461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A study of sexual variation in Indian femur.
    Purkait R; Chandra H
    Forensic Sci Int; 2004 Nov; 146(1):25-33. PubMed ID: 15485718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of Purkait's triangle method for determining sexual dimorphism.
    Brown RP; Ubelaker DH; Schanfield MS
    J Forensic Sci; 2007 May; 52(3):553-6. PubMed ID: 17456081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Sex estimation in a modern American osteological sample using a discriminant function analysis from the calcaneus.
    DiMichele DL; Spradley MK
    Forensic Sci Int; 2012 Sep; 221(1-3):152.e1-5. PubMed ID: 22512944
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Sexing skulls using discriminant function analysis of visually assessed traits.
    Walker PL
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2008 May; 136(1):39-50. PubMed ID: 18324631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measurements of ulna--a new method for determination of sex.
    Purkait R
    J Forensic Sci; 2001 Jul; 46(4):924-7. PubMed ID: 11451080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sex determination using the second cervical vertebra--A test of the method.
    Marlow EJ; Pastor RF
    J Forensic Sci; 2011 Jan; 56(1):165-9. PubMed ID: 20735699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Discriminant function sexing of fragmentary and complete femora: standards for contemporary Croatia.
    Slaus M; Strinović D; Skavić J; Petrovecki V
    J Forensic Sci; 2003 May; 48(3):509-12. PubMed ID: 12762518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Sex estimation using the first cervical vertebra.
    Marino EA
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 1995 Jun; 97(2):127-33. PubMed ID: 7653504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A comparison between neural network and other metric methods to determine sex from the upper femur in a modern French population.
    du Jardin P; Ponsaillé J; Alunni-Perret V; Quatrehomme G
    Forensic Sci Int; 2009 Nov; 192(1-3):127.e1-6. PubMed ID: 19733989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Estimation of Purkait's triangle method and alternative models for sex assessment from the proximal femur in the Spanish population.
    Djorojevic M; Roldán C; Botella M; Alemán I
    Int J Legal Med; 2016 Jan; 130(1):245-51. PubMed ID: 25951948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A method for estimating sex using metric analysis of the scapula.
    Dabbs GR; Moore-Jansen PH
    J Forensic Sci; 2010 Jan; 55(1):149-52. PubMed ID: 20002272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Determination of skeletal sex using discriminant analysis of ulnar measurements].
    Introna F; Dragone M; Frassanito P; Colonna M
    Boll Soc Ital Biol Sper; 1993 Sep; 69(9):517-23. PubMed ID: 8155309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Human body mass estimation: a comparison of "morphometric" and "mechanical" methods.
    Auerbach BM; Ruff CB
    Am J Phys Anthropol; 2004 Dec; 125(4):331-42. PubMed ID: 15472894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Metric determination of sex from the humerus in a Guatemalan forensic sample.
    Ríos Frutos L
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):153-7. PubMed ID: 15567620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Triangle identified at the proximal end of femur: a new sex determinant.
    Purkait R
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Jan; 147(2-3):135-9. PubMed ID: 15567617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.