These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1058241)

  • 1. Status report on silver amalgam. Council on Dental Materials and Devices.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1975 Sep; 91(3):618-21. PubMed ID: 1058241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Long-term influences on marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Letzel H; Vrijhoef MM
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Mar; 11(2):95-101. PubMed ID: 6585529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [A basic study on gallium alloys for dental restorations. Improvement of liquid gallium alloy].
    Yada I
    Fukuoka Shika Daigaku Gakkai Zasshi; 1989; 16(2):97-117. PubMed ID: 2488904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Clinical performance of a gold-containing amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Marantz R; Adey JD
    J Dent Res; 1979 Nov; 58(11):2109-15. PubMed ID: 292678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The new generation amalgam alloys. Clinical considerations.
    Jordan RE; Suzuki M; Boksman L
    Dent Clin North Am; 1985 Apr; 29(2):341-58. PubMed ID: 3858165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. [Gallium: an alternative for amalgam?].
    Schuurs AH; Davidson CL
    Ned Tijdschr Tandheelkd; 1997 Apr; 104(4):142-5. PubMed ID: 11924385
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Impact of the marginal border on the longevity of silver amalgam restorations].
    Seguin C; Gras N
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1978; 7(5):331-8. PubMed ID: 283478
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effect of condensers on adaptability and microporosity of amalgam restorations.
    Coradazzi JL; Hadavi F; Asgar K
    J Pedod; 1983; 8(1):57-70. PubMed ID: 6584582
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Factors affecting the marginal leakage of amalgam.
    Mahler DB; Nelson LW
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1984 Jan; 108(1):51-4. PubMed ID: 6582114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Microprobe analysis of dental amalgam alloy particles of Ag-Cu eutectic composition.
    Bryant RW
    J Oral Rehabil; 1984 Nov; 11(6):571-8. PubMed ID: 6595383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Creep versus marginal fracture of amalgam restorations.
    Vrijhoef MM; Letzel H
    J Oral Rehabil; 1986 Jul; 13(4):299-303. PubMed ID: 3463718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Studies on Pd base ternary alloys for dental amalgam. (Part 1) Effect of size and shape of particle on dimensional change and mechanical properties (author's transl)].
    Yasumura I
    Shika Rikogaku Zasshi; 1979 Oct; 20(52):240-54. PubMed ID: 295068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cleaning silver-tin amalgam alloy.
    Stonehouse I
    Br Dent J; 1983 Feb; 154(3):78-80. PubMed ID: 6572518
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [A study of the size and shape of alloy particles in dental amalgams].
    Rapte K; Dyran R
    Hell Stomatol Chron; 1978; 22(1):39-43. PubMed ID: 298848
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Early fracture resistance of amalgapin-retained complex amalgam restorations.
    Schulte GA; Hermesch CB; Vandewalle KS; Buikema DJ
    Oper Dent; 1998; 23(3):108-12. PubMed ID: 9656920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The physical properties of a gallium alloy restorative material.
    Blair FM; Whitworth JM; McCabe JF
    Dent Mater; 1995 Jul; 11(4):277-80. PubMed ID: 8621052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. An evaluation of a lathe-cut high-copper amalgam alloy.
    Knibbs PJ; Plant CG; Shovelton DS; Jones PA
    J Oral Rehabil; 1987 Sep; 14(5):465-73. PubMed ID: 3312541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal adaptation of amalgam and resin composite restorations in Class II conservative preparations.
    Duncalf WV; Wilson NH
    Quintessence Int; 2001 May; 32(5):391-5. PubMed ID: 11444073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A clinical and laboratory study comparing three amalgam alloys of random particle-size, mixed phase with one of conventional regular lathe-cut particles.
    Morris ME; Braham RL; Schmutz JR; Kahl EA
    Acta Odontol Pediatr; 1981 Dec; 2(2):41-5. PubMed ID: 6949492
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Selection of amalgam alloys: particle form, new formulas.
    Phillips RW
    ASDC J Dent Child; 1973; 40(2):106-12. PubMed ID: 4569096
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.