These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

144 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10582500)

  • 1. Spine loading and trunk kinematics during team lifting.
    Marras WS; Davis KG; Kirking BC; Granata KP
    Ergonomics; 1999 Oct; 42(10):1258-73. PubMed ID: 10582500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in spine loading patterns throughout the workday as a function of experience, lift frequency, and personality.
    Chany AM; Parakkat J; Yang G; Burr DL; Marras WS
    Spine J; 2006; 6(3):296-305. PubMed ID: 16651224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Spine loading during asymmetric lifting using one versus two hands.
    Marras WS; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 1998 Jun; 41(6):817-34. PubMed ID: 9629066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Dynamic biomechanical modelling of symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks in restricted postures.
    Gallagher S; Hamrick CA; Love AC; Marras WS
    Ergonomics; 1994 Aug; 37(8):1289-310. PubMed ID: 7925254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spinal loads during individual and team lifting.
    Dennis GJ; Barrett RS
    Ergonomics; 2002 Aug; 45(10):671-81. PubMed ID: 12437851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Trunk kinematics of one-handed lifting, and the effects of asymmetry and load weight.
    Allread WG; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Ergonomics; 1996 Feb; 39(2):322-34. PubMed ID: 8851536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effects of unexpected lateral mass placement on trunk loading in lifting.
    van der Burg JC; Kingma I; van Dieën JH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Apr; 28(8):764-70. PubMed ID: 12698118
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effects of box features on spine loading during warehouse order selecting.
    Marras WS; Granata KP; Davis KG; Allread WG; Jorgensen MJ
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jul; 42(7):980-96. PubMed ID: 10424186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effect of foot movement and an elastic lumbar back support on spinal loading during free-dynamic symmetric and asymmetric lifting exertions.
    Marras WS; Jorgensen MJ; Davis KG
    Ergonomics; 2000 May; 43(5):653-68. PubMed ID: 10877482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of posture on dynamic back loading during a cable lifting task.
    Gallagher S; Marras WS; Davis KG; Kovacs K
    Ergonomics; 2002 Apr; 45(5):380-98. PubMed ID: 12028722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Spine loading as a function of lift frequency, exposure duration, and work experience.
    Marras WS; Parakkat J; Chany AM; Yang G; Burr D; Lavender SA
    Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon); 2006 May; 21(4):345-52. PubMed ID: 16310299
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of lifting speed on the peak external forward bending, lateral bending, and twisting spine moments.
    Lavender SA; Li YC; Andersson GB; Natarajan RN
    Ergonomics; 1999 Jan; 42(1):111-25. PubMed ID: 9973875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A stochastic model of trunk muscle coactivation during trunk bending.
    Mirka GA; Marras WS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1993 Sep; 18(11):1396-409. PubMed ID: 8235810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Spinal loading during manual materials handling in a kneeling posture.
    Splittstoesser RE; Yang G; Knapik GG; Trippany DR; Hoyle JA; Lahoti P; Korkmaz SV; Sommerich CM; Lavender SA; Marras WS
    J Electromyogr Kinesiol; 2007 Feb; 17(1):25-34. PubMed ID: 16517181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading.
    Kingma I; Bosch T; Bruins L; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2004 Oct; 47(13):1365-85. PubMed ID: 15513714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The effects of a sloped ground surface on trunk kinematics and L5/S1 moment during lifting.
    Shin G; Mirka G
    Ergonomics; 2004 May; 47(6):646-59. PubMed ID: 15204292
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Regression models for predicting peak and continuous three-dimensional spinal loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks.
    Fathallah FA; Marras WS; Parnianpour M
    Hum Factors; 1999 Sep; 41(3):373-88. PubMed ID: 10665206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Injury-induced kinematic compensations within the lower back: impact of non-lower back injuries.
    Davis KG; Seol H
    Ergonomics; 2005 Feb; 48(2):135-49. PubMed ID: 15764313
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Investigating reduced bag weight as an effective risk mediator for mason tenders.
    Davis KG; Kotowski SE; Albers J; Marras WS
    Appl Ergon; 2010 Oct; 41(6):822-31. PubMed ID: 20206915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of lifting height and load mass on low back loading.
    Hoozemans MJ; Kingma I; de Vries WH; van Dieën JH
    Ergonomics; 2008 Jul; 51(7):1053-63. PubMed ID: 18568964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.