These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

205 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10582531)

  • 1. The relationship between the acoustic reflex threshold and levels of loudness categories in hearing-impaired listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):308-11. PubMed ID: 10582531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The acoustic reflex threshold: not predictive for loudness perception in normally-hearing listeners.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(6):303-7. PubMed ID: 10582530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can maximum comfortable loudness levels in hearing impaired listeners be predicted from ipsilateral acoustic reflex thresholds recorded with high frequency probes?
    Rawool VW
    Scand Audiol; 2001; 30(2):96-105. PubMed ID: 11409793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The relationship between the uncomfortable loudness level and the acoustic reflex threshold for pure tones in normally-hearing and impaired listeners--a meta-analysis.
    Olsen SO
    Audiology; 1999; 38(2):61-8. PubMed ID: 10206514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness in patients with unilateral hearing losses.
    Kawase T; Hidaka H; Ikeda K; Hashimoto S; Takasaka T
    Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol; 1998; 255(1):7-11. PubMed ID: 9592667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Acoustic reflex threshold and loudness discomfort.
    Al-Azazi MF; Othman BM
    Saudi Med J; 2000 Mar; 21(3):251-6. PubMed ID: 11533793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Recruitment detection--a comparison of category loudness scaling and classical supra-threshold audiometry].
    Kiessling J; Pfreimer C; Schubert M
    Laryngorhinootologie; 1996 Jan; 75(1):10-7. PubMed ID: 8851113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimized loudness-function estimation for categorical loudness scaling data.
    Oetting D; Brand T; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2014 Oct; 316():16-27. PubMed ID: 25058812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Electrical middle ear muscle reflex: use in cochlear implant programming.
    Hodges AV; Balkany TJ; Ruth RA; Lambert PR; Dolan-Ash S; Schloffman JJ
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 1997 Sep; 117(3 Pt 1):255-61. PubMed ID: 9334774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Loudness summation of equal loud narrowband signals in normal-hearing and hearing-impaired listeners.
    Ewert SD; Oetting D
    Int J Audiol; 2018 Jun; 57(sup3):S71-S80. PubMed ID: 28971746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Reliability of categorical loudness scaling and its relation to threshold.
    Al-Salim SC; Kopun JG; Neely ST; Jesteadt W; Stiegemann B; Gorga MP
    Ear Hear; 2010 Aug; 31(4):567-78. PubMed ID: 20588122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Relationship between loudness discomfort level and acoustic reflex threshold for normal and sensorineural hearing-impaired individuals.
    McLeod HL; Greenberg HJ
    J Speech Hear Res; 1979 Dec; 22(4):873-83. PubMed ID: 513694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Loudness perception is influenced by long-term hearing aid use.
    Olsen SO; Rasmussen AN; Nielsen LH; Borgkvist BV
    Audiology; 1999; 38(4):202-5. PubMed ID: 10431906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Loudness discomfort level in normal hearing individuals].
    Knobel KA; Sanchez TG
    Pro Fono; 2006; 18(1):31-40. PubMed ID: 16625869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Loudness scaling revisited.
    Elberling C
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1999 May; 10(5):248-60. PubMed ID: 10331617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acoustic reflex and loudness recruitment.
    Fitzzaland RE; Borton TE
    J Otolaryngol; 1977 Dec; 6(6):460-5. PubMed ID: 616289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Preferred overall loudness. I: Sound field presentation in the laboratory.
    Smeds K; Keidser G; Zakis J; Dillon H; Leijon A; Grant F; Convery E; Brew C
    Int J Audiol; 2006 Jan; 45(1):2-11. PubMed ID: 16562559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Spectral and binaural loudness summation for hearing-impaired listeners.
    Oetting D; Hohmann V; Appell JE; Kollmeier B; Ewert SD
    Hear Res; 2016 May; 335():179-192. PubMed ID: 27006003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Relationship between uncomfortable loudness level and acoustic reflex threshold as a function of hearing loss.
    Charuhas PA; Chung DY; Barry S
    J Aud Res; 1978 Oct; 18(4):237-42. PubMed ID: 756864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Monaural and binaural loudness measures in cochlear implant users with contralateral residual hearing.
    Blamey PJ; Dooley GJ; James CJ; Parisi ES
    Ear Hear; 2000 Feb; 21(1):6-17. PubMed ID: 10708069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.