166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10582535)
1. First audiometric results with the Vibrant soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing loss.
Snik AF; Cremers CW
Audiology; 1999; 38(6):335-8. PubMed ID: 10582535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Vibrant semi-implantable hearing device with digital sound processing: effective gain and speech perception.
Snik AF; Cremers CW
Arch Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2001 Dec; 127(12):1433-7. PubMed ID: 11735810
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Multicenter audiometric results with the Vibrant Soundbridge, a semi-implantable hearing device for sensorineural hearing impairment.
Snik AF; Mylanus EA; Cremers CW; Dillier N; Fisch U; Gnadeberg D; Lenarz T; Mazolli M; Babighian G; Uziel AS; Cooper HR; O'Connor AF; Fraysse B; Charachon R; Shehata-Dieler WE
Otolaryngol Clin North Am; 2001 Apr; 34(2):373-88. PubMed ID: 11382576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Effects of stimulus level on the speech perception abilities of children using cochlear implants or digital hearing aids.
Davidson LS
Ear Hear; 2006 Oct; 27(5):493-507. PubMed ID: 16957500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Our auditory results using the Vibrant Soundbridge on the long process of the incus: 20 years of data.
Grégoire A; Van Damme JP; Gilain C; Bihin B; Garin P
Auris Nasus Larynx; 2018 Feb; 45(1):66-72. PubMed ID: 28285827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Use of a loudness model for hearing aid fitting. IV. Fitting hearing aids with multi-channel compression so as to restore 'normal' loudness for speech at different levels.
Moore BC
Br J Audiol; 2000 Jun; 34(3):165-77. PubMed ID: 10905450
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A comparison of threshold-based fitting strategies for nonlinear hearing aids.
Stelmachowicz PG; Dalzell S; Peterson D; Kopun J; Lewis DL; Hoover BE
Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):131-8. PubMed ID: 9562535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ["Vibrant Soundbridge" middle ear implant for auditory rehabilitation in sensory hearing loss. I. Clinical aspects, indications and initial results].
Dazert S; Shehata-Dieler WE; Dieler R; Helms J
Laryngorhinootologie; 2000 Aug; 79(8):459-64. PubMed ID: 11006909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The floating mass transducer of the Vibrant Soundbridge interposed between the stapes and tympanic membrane after incus necrosis.
Cremers CW; Verhaegen VJ; Snik AF
Otol Neurotol; 2009 Jan; 30(1):76-8. PubMed ID: 18957899
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Vibrant Sound Bridge System. A new kind hearing prosthesis for patients with sensorineural hearing loss. 2. Audiological results].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Issing PR; Gnadeberg D; Ambjørnsen K; Mack KF; Winter M
Laryngorhinootologie; 2001 Jul; 80(7):370-80. PubMed ID: 11488147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Speech recognition performance of patients with sensorineural hearing loss under unaided and aided conditions using linear and compression hearing AIDS.
Shanks JE; Wilson RH; Larson V; Williams D
Ear Hear; 2002 Aug; 23(4):280-90. PubMed ID: 12195170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Vibrant Soundbridge implantable hearing device: critical review and single-surgeon short- and long-term results.
Luetje CM; Brown SA; Cullen RD
Ear Nose Throat J; 2010 Sep; 89(9):E9-E14. PubMed ID: 20859861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A middle ear implant, the Symphonix Vibrant Soundbridge: retrospective study of the first 125 patients implanted in France.
Sterkers O; Boucarra D; Labassi S; Bebear JP; Dubreuil C; Frachet B; Fraysse B; Lavieille JP; Magnan J; Martin C; Truy E; Uziel A; Vaneecloo FM
Otol Neurotol; 2003 May; 24(3):427-36. PubMed ID: 12806295
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of different vibrant soundbridge audioprocessors with conventional hearing AIDS.
Todt I; Seidl RO; Gross M; Ernst A
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Sep; 23(5):669-73. PubMed ID: 12218618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Comparison of Alternative Coupling Methods of the Vibrant Soundbridge Floating Mass Transducer.
Busch S; Lenarz T; Maier H
Audiol Neurootol; 2016; 21(6):347-355. PubMed ID: 28068651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [The Vibrant Soundbridge System: a new kind of hearing aid for sensorineural hearing loss. 1: Function and initial clinical experiences].
Lenarz T; Weber BP; Mack KF; Battmer RD; Gnadeberg D
Laryngorhinootologie; 1998 May; 77(5):247-55. PubMed ID: 9644671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Measurement method for the assessment of transmission properties of implantable hearing aids.
Winter M; Weber BP; Lenarz T
Biomed Tech (Berl); 2002; 47 Suppl 1 Pt 2():726-7. PubMed ID: 12465286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Duration, compression, and the aided loudness discomfort level.
Fortune T; Scheller T
Ear Hear; 2000 Aug; 21(4):329-41. PubMed ID: 10981609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Middle ear electromagnetic semi-implantable hearing device: results of the phase II SOUNDTEC direct system clinical trial.
Hough JV; Matthews P; Wood MW; Dyer RK
Otol Neurotol; 2002 Nov; 23(6):895-903. PubMed ID: 12438853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
