159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10582573)
1. Disk-covering, a fast-converging method for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Huson DH; Nettles SM; Warnow TJ
J Comput Biol; 1999; 6(3-4):369-86. PubMed ID: 10582573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Fast recovery of evolutionary trees with thousands of nodes.
Csurös M
J Comput Biol; 2002; 9(2):277-97. PubMed ID: 12015882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Do tree split probabilities determine the branch lengths?
Chor B; Steel M
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():54-9. PubMed ID: 25843219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. On the inference of large phylogenies with long branches: how long is too long?
Mossel E; Roch S; Sly A
Bull Math Biol; 2011 Jul; 73(7):1627-44. PubMed ID: 20931293
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. SATe-II: very fast and accurate simultaneous estimation of multiple sequence alignments and phylogenetic trees.
Liu K; Warnow TJ; Holder MT; Nelesen SM; Yu J; Stamatakis AP; Linder CR
Syst Biol; 2012 Jan; 61(1):90-106. PubMed ID: 22139466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bayesian coestimation of phylogeny and sequence alignment.
Lunter G; Miklós I; Drummond A; Jensen JL; Hein J
BMC Bioinformatics; 2005 Apr; 6():83. PubMed ID: 15804354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Very fast algorithms for evaluating the stability of ML and Bayesian phylogenetic trees from sequence data.
Waddell PJ; Kishino H; Ota R
Genome Inform; 2002; 13():82-92. PubMed ID: 14571377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Solving large scale phylogenetic problems using DCM2.
Huson DH; Vawter L; Warnow TJ
Proc Int Conf Intell Syst Mol Biol; 1999; ():118-29. PubMed ID: 10786294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Assessment of protein distance measures and tree-building methods for phylogenetic tree reconstruction.
Hollich V; Milchert L; Arvestad L; Sonnhammer EL
Mol Biol Evol; 2005 Nov; 22(11):2257-64. PubMed ID: 16049194
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Evaluating the relationship between evolutionary divergence and phylogenetic accuracy in AFLP data sets.
García-Pereira MJ; Caballero A; Quesada H
Mol Biol Evol; 2010 May; 27(5):988-1000. PubMed ID: 20026482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Shrinkage effect in ancestral maximum likelihood.
Mossel E; Roch S; Steel M
IEEE/ACM Trans Comput Biol Bioinform; 2009; 6(1):126-33. PubMed ID: 19179706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. On the quality of tree-based protein classification.
Lazareva-Ulitsky B; Diemer K; Thomas PD
Bioinformatics; 2005 May; 21(9):1876-90. PubMed ID: 15647305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Modelling heterotachy in phylogenetic inference by reversible-jump Markov chain Monte Carlo.
Pagel M; Meade A
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2008 Dec; 363(1512):3955-64. PubMed ID: 18852097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A signal-to-noise analysis of phylogeny estimation by neighbor-joining: Insufficiency of polynomial length sequences.
Lacey MR; Chang JT
Math Biosci; 2006 Feb; 199(2):188-215. PubMed ID: 16412478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Toward extracting all phylogenetic information from matrices of evolutionary distances.
Roch S
Science; 2010 Mar; 327(5971):1376-9. PubMed ID: 20223986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Identifiability of the unrooted species tree topology under the coalescent model with time-reversible substitution processes, site-specific rate variation, and invariable sites.
Chifman J; Kubatko L
J Theor Biol; 2015 Jun; 374():35-47. PubMed ID: 25791286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Designing fast converging phylogenetic methods.
Nakhleh L; Roshan U; St John K; Sun J; Warnow T
Bioinformatics; 2001; 17 Suppl 1():S190-8. PubMed ID: 11473009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Classifying and counting linear phylogenetic invariants for the Jukes-Cantor model.
Steel MA; Fu YX
J Comput Biol; 1995; 2(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 7497119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Identifying evolutionary trees and substitution parameters for the general Markov model with invariable sites.
Allman ES; Rhodes JA
Math Biosci; 2008 Jan; 211(1):18-33. PubMed ID: 17964612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Bayesian hypothesis testing of four-taxon topologies using molecular sequence data.
Sinsheimer JS; Lake JA; Little RJ
Biometrics; 1996 Mar; 52(1):193-210. PubMed ID: 8934592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
