These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10583283)

  • 1. Electronic evaluation of the value of double gloving.
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Abidi H; Fabry J
    Br J Surg; 1999 Nov; 86(11):1387-90. PubMed ID: 10583283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Electronic detection of breaks in the surgeon-patient barrier. Evaluation of protective clothing in visceral surgery].
    Caillot JL; Côte C; Lemaire C; Fabry J
    Ann Chir; 2000 May; 125(4):358-62. PubMed ID: 10900738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Efficacy of double versus single gloving in protecting the operating team.
    Gani JS; Anseline PF; Bissett RL
    Aust N Z J Surg; 1990 Mar; 60(3):171-5. PubMed ID: 2327922
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery.
    Korniewicz D; El-Masri M
    AORN J; 2012 Mar; 95(3):328-36. PubMed ID: 22381552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Double gloving as self protection in abdominal surgery.
    Jensen SL; Kristensen B; Fabrin K
    Eur J Surg; 1997 Mar; 163(3):163-7. PubMed ID: 9085056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prospective study of glove perforation in obstetrical and gynecological operations: are we safe enough?
    Malhotra M; Sharma JB; Wadhwa L; Arora R
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Aug; 30(4):319-22. PubMed ID: 15238110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Prospective randomized assessment of single versus double-gloving for general surgical procedures.
    Na'aya HU; Madziga AG; Eni UE
    Niger J Med; 2009; 18(1):73-4. PubMed ID: 19485153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incidence of glove perforations in gastrointestinal surgery and the protective effect of double gloves: a prospective, randomised controlled study.
    Naver LP; Gottrup F
    Eur J Surg; 2000 Apr; 166(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 10817324
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomized controlled trial of glove perforation in single- and double-gloving in episiotomy repair after vaginal delivery.
    Punyatanasakchai P; Chittacharoen A; Ayudhya NI
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2004 Oct; 30(5):354-7. PubMed ID: 15327447
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Intraoperative glove perforation--single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination.
    Thomas S; Agarwal M; Mehta G
    Postgrad Med J; 2001 Jul; 77(909):458-60. PubMed ID: 11423598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Efficacy of double gloving with a coloured inner pair for immediate detection of operative glove perforations.
    Duron JJ; Keilani K; Elian NG
    Eur J Surg; 1996 Dec; 162(12):941-4. PubMed ID: 9001874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [The risk of surgical glove perforations].
    Hagen GØ; Arntzen H
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2007 Mar; 127(7):856-8. PubMed ID: 17435804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Is double-gloving really protective? A comparison between the glove perforation rate among perioperative nurses with single and double gloves during surgery.
    Guo YP; Wong PM; Li Y; Or PP
    Am J Surg; 2012 Aug; 204(2):210-5. PubMed ID: 22342011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Surgeon protection: early recognition of glove perforation using a green under glove.
    Brown JN
    J R Coll Surg Edinb; 1996 Dec; 41(6):395-6. PubMed ID: 8997027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Frequency of glove perforation and the protective effect of double gloves in gynecological surgery.
    Murta EF; Silva CS; Júnior OR
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2003 Jun; 268(2):82-4. PubMed ID: 12768294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation.
    Gaujac C; Ceccheti MM; Yonezaki F; Garcia IR; Peres MP
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2007 Oct; 65(10):1922-5. PubMed ID: 17884516
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Surgeon-patient barrier efficiency monitored with an electronic device in three surgical settings.
    Hentz VR; Stephanides M; Boraldi A; Tessari R; Isani R; Cadossi R; Biscione R; Massari L; Traina GC
    World J Surg; 2001 Sep; 25(9):1101-8. PubMed ID: 11571942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Anticipated detection of imminent surgeon-patient barrier breaches. A prospective randomized controlled trial using an indicator underglove system.
    Caillot JL; Paparel P; Arnal E; Schreiber V; Voiglio EJ
    World J Surg; 2006 Jan; 30(1):134-8. PubMed ID: 16369716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cardiac surgical procedures and glove reinforcements.
    Alrawi SJ; Houshan I; Zanial SA; Cunningham JN; Acinapura AJ; Raju R
    Heart Surg Forum; 2002; 5(1):66-8. PubMed ID: 11937466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The rate of glove perforations in orthopaedic procedures: single versus double gloving. A prospective study.
    Chan KY; Singh VA; Oun BH; To BH
    Med J Malaysia; 2006 Dec; 61 Suppl B():3-7. PubMed ID: 17605178
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.