These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
7. Comparison of different J-pouches vs. straight and side-to-end coloanal anastomoses: experimental study in pigs. Sailer M; Debus ES; Fuchs KH; Fein M; Beyerlein J; Thiede A Dis Colon Rectum; 1999 May; 42(5):590-5. PubMed ID: 10344679 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Use of a colonic pouch as a rectal substitute after rectal excision. Teixeira FV; Pera M; Kelly KA Arq Gastroenterol; 1999; 36(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 10511890 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in ano-neorectal physiology of ileoanal and coloanal reconstructions for restorative proctectomy. Rink AD; Kneist W; Radinski I; Guinot-Barona A; Lang H; Vestweber KH Colorectal Dis; 2010 Apr; 12(4):342-50. PubMed ID: 19207698 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison between the colonic J pouch-anal anastomosis and healthy rectum: clinical and physiological function. Hallböök O; Sjödahl R Br J Surg; 1997 Oct; 84(10):1437-41. PubMed ID: 9361608 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Scintigraphic comparison of neorectal emptying between colonic J-pouch anastomosis and straight anastomosis after stapled low anterior resection. Sugamata Y; Takase Y; Oya M Int J Colorectal Dis; 2003 Jul; 18(4):355-60. PubMed ID: 12677455 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Different role of the colonic pouch for low anterior resection and coloanal anastomosis. Tonelli F; Garcea A; Batignani G Tech Coloproctol; 2005 Apr; 9(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 15868493 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]