These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
125 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10583353)
1. The laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers versus paralysed anaesthetized patients: ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, intracuff pressures and anatomic position. Brimacombe J; Keller C Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):699-701. PubMed ID: 10583353 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The intubating laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers vs. paralysed anesthetised patients. Keller C; Brimacombe J Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1067-9. PubMed ID: 10566929 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers. Brimacombe JR; Keller C; Gunkel AR; Pühringer F Anesth Analg; 1999 Jul; 89(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 10389800 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients. Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children. Choi KW; Lee JR; Oh JT; Kim DW; Kim MS Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 25059727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal. Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: effect of handle elevation on efficacy of seal, fibreoptic position, blind intubation and airway protection. Keller C; Brimacombe JR; Rädler C; Pühringer F; Brimacombe NS Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Aug; 28(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 10969369 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers. Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure? Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients. Keller C; Brimacombe J Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways. Brimacombe J; Keller C Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway. Keller C; Brimacombe J Br J Anaesth; 1999 Sep; 83(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 10655926 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients. Brimacombe J; Keller C Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure. Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriate size of laryngeal mask airway for children. Loke GP; Tan SM; Ng AS Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Dec; 30(6):771-4. PubMed ID: 12500516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications. Li BB; Yan J; Zhou HG; Hao J; Liu AJ; Ma ZL Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(19):2570-6. PubMed ID: 26415792 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients. Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients. Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]