128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10583353)
1. The laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers versus paralysed anaesthetized patients: ease of insertion, airway sealing pressure, intracuff pressures and anatomic position.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Eur J Anaesthesiol; 1999 Oct; 16(10):699-701. PubMed ID: 10583353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The intubating laryngeal mask airway in fresh cadavers vs. paralysed anesthetised patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Nov; 46(11):1067-9. PubMed ID: 10566929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of the disposable versus the reusable laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C; Morris R; Mecklem D
Anesth Analg; 1998 Oct; 87(4):921-4. PubMed ID: 9768795
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The influence of the tonsillar gag on efficacy of seal, anatomic position, airway patency, and airway protection with the flexible laryngeal mask airway: a randomized, cross-over study of fresh adult cadavers.
Brimacombe JR; Keller C; Gunkel AR; Pühringer F
Anesth Analg; 1999 Jul; 89(1):181-6. PubMed ID: 10389800
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The laryngeal mask airway Supreme--a single use laryngeal mask airway with an oesophageal vent. A randomised, cross-over study with the laryngeal mask airway ProSeal in paralysed, anaesthetised patients.
Eschertzhuber S; Brimacombe J; Hohlrieder M; Keller C
Anaesthesia; 2009 Jan; 64(1):79-83. PubMed ID: 19087011
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The randomized crossover comparison of airway sealing with the laryngeal mask airway Supreme(™) at three different intracuff pressures in children.
Choi KW; Lee JR; Oh JT; Kim DW; Kim MS
Paediatr Anaesth; 2014 Oct; 24(10):1080-7. PubMed ID: 25059727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparisons of clinical performance of Guardian laryngeal mask with laryngeal mask airway ProSeal.
Pajiyar AK; Wen Z; Wang H; Ma L; Miao L; Wang G
BMC Anesthesiol; 2015 May; 15():69. PubMed ID: 25929558
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The intubating laryngeal mask airway: effect of handle elevation on efficacy of seal, fibreoptic position, blind intubation and airway protection.
Keller C; Brimacombe JR; Rädler C; Pühringer F; Brimacombe NS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2000 Aug; 28(4):414-9. PubMed ID: 10969369
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Pressures exerted against the cervical vertebrae by the standard and intubating laryngeal mask airways: a randomized, controlled, cross-over study in fresh cadavers.
Keller C; Brimacombe J; Keller K
Anesth Analg; 1999 Nov; 89(5):1296-300. PubMed ID: 10553855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A randomized comparison of the laryngeal mask airway supreme™ and laryngeal mask airway unique™ in infants and children: does cuff pressure influence leak pressure?
Jagannathan N; Sohn L; Sommers K; Belvis D; Shah RD; Sawardekar A; Eidem J; Dagraca J; Mukherji I
Paediatr Anaesth; 2013 Oct; 23(10):927-33. PubMed ID: 23521105
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Mucosal pressure and oropharyngeal leak pressure with the ProSeal versus laryngeal mask airway in anaesthetized paralysed patients.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 2000 Aug; 85(2):262-6. PubMed ID: 10992836
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of the flexible and standard laryngeal mask airways.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Can J Anaesth; 1999 Jun; 46(6):558-63. PubMed ID: 10391603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Influence of neuromuscular block, mode of ventilation and respiratory cycle on pharyngeal mucosal pressures with the laryngeal mask airway.
Keller C; Brimacombe J
Br J Anaesth; 1999 Sep; 83(3):480-2. PubMed ID: 10655926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The ProSeal laryngeal mask airway: A randomized, crossover study with the standard laryngeal mask airway in paralyzed, anesthetized patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesthesiology; 2000 Jul; 93(1):104-9. PubMed ID: 10861152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A comparison of pharyngeal mucosal pressure and airway sealing pressure with the laryngeal mask airway in anesthetized adult patients.
Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anesth Analg; 1998 Dec; 87(6):1379-82. PubMed ID: 9842832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A comparison of the reinforced and standard laryngeal mask airway: ease of insertion and the influence of head and neck position on oropharyngeal leak pressure and intracuff pressure.
Buckham M; Brooker M; Brimacombe J; Keller C
Anaesth Intensive Care; 1999 Dec; 27(6):628-31. PubMed ID: 10631418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Appropriate size of laryngeal mask airway for children.
Loke GP; Tan SM; Ng AS
Anaesth Intensive Care; 2002 Dec; 30(6):771-4. PubMed ID: 12500516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Application of Minimum Effective Cuff Inflating Volume for Laryngeal Mask Airway and its Impact on Postoperative Pharyngeal Complications.
Li BB; Yan J; Zhou HG; Hao J; Liu AJ; Ma ZL
Chin Med J (Engl); 2015 Oct; 128(19):2570-6. PubMed ID: 26415792
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of the LMA-classic with the new disposable soft seal laryngeal mask in spontaneously breathing adult patients.
Van Zundert AA; Fonck K; Al-Shaikh B; Mortier E
Anesthesiology; 2003 Nov; 99(5):1066-71. PubMed ID: 14576541
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Randomized crossover comparison of the proseal with the classic laryngeal mask airway in unparalysed anaesthetized patients.
Cook TM; Nolan JP; Verghese C; Strube PJ; Lees M; Millar JM; Baskett PJ
Br J Anaesth; 2002 Apr; 88(4):527-33. PubMed ID: 12066729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
