These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

203 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10584098)

  • 1. The Chaoulli case: one-tier medicine goes on trial in Quebec.
    Pinker S
    CMAJ; 1999 Nov; 161(10):1305-6. PubMed ID: 10584098
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Private health care in Canada.
    Steinbrook R
    N Engl J Med; 2006 Apr; 354(16):1661-4. PubMed ID: 16625005
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Quality v. equality: the divided court in Chaoulli v. Quebec.
    Yeo M; Lucock C
    Health Law J; 2006; 14():129-50. PubMed ID: 17563960
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Chaoulli decision: a debate in which physicians must be heard.
    Ouellet R
    CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):896. PubMed ID: 16217113
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Supreme Court strikes ban on private health insurance.
    Eggertson L
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):139. PubMed ID: 15947235
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Chaoulli Case: a two-tier Magna Carta?
    Marchildon GP
    Healthc Q; 2005; 8(4):49-52, 2. PubMed ID: 16323514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Chaoulli decision resonates one year later.
    Kondro W
    CMAJ; 2006 Jul; 175(1):17. PubMed ID: 16818893
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Private medical care comes to Canada.
    CMAJ; 2005 Aug; 173(3):225, 227. PubMed ID: 16076799
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Health care rights in Canada: the Chaoulli legacy.
    Flood CM; Xavier S
    Med Law; 2008 Sep; 27(3):617-44. PubMed ID: 19004386
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Increasing private delivery of publicly funded services?
    Pindera L
    CMAJ; 2005 Jan; 172(2):167. PubMed ID: 15655232
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Medicare challenge heads to trial.
    Vogel L
    CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E331-E332. PubMed ID: 27601607
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public health care challenged in BC court.
    Mertl S
    CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(14):E333-E334. PubMed ID: 27620633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Private health insurance: an international overview and considerations for Canada.
    Dhalla I
    Healthc Q; 2007; 10(4):89-96. PubMed ID: 18274001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The government responds to the Chaoulli/Zeliotis judgment, easing open the door to privatization.
    Perspect Infirm; 2006; 3(5 Suppl):1, 3. PubMed ID: 16776035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Health insurance - private or legally mandated? Choosing a suitable insurance group].
    Aktuelle Urol; 2014 Sep; 45(5):361-2. PubMed ID: 25275690
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Public versus private: the medical resident perspective.
    Hoyt B
    CMAJ; 2005 Oct; 173(8):898-9. PubMed ID: 16217114
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Prescription drug benefits for seniors and public/private collaboration.
    Brekke M
    Beginnings; 2002; 22(3):11. PubMed ID: 12046112
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. BC refutes Charter challenge of medicare.
    Mertl S
    CMAJ; 2016 Oct; 188(15):E369-E370. PubMed ID: 27647614
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [The responsibilities of the private health insurance company doctor - a balancing act].
    Ostendorf GM
    Versicherungsmedizin; 2014 Jun; 66(2):65. PubMed ID: 25000625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Supreme disagreement: the highest court affirms an empty right.
    Flood CM; Sullivan T
    CMAJ; 2005 Jul; 173(2):142-3. PubMed ID: 15967947
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.