175 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10584649)
1. Analysis of radiation scatter during angiographic procedures: evaluation of a phantom model and a modified radiation protection system.
Ito H; Hosoya T; Eguchi Y; Adachi M; Watanabe Y; Yamaguchi K
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 1999; 10(10):1343-50. PubMed ID: 10584649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiation protection system for interventional procedures of the upper extremity: evaluation in a phantom model.
Haku T; Hosoya T; Ito H; Eguchi Y; Watanabe Y; Nishina M
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2002 Aug; 13(8):815-22. PubMed ID: 12171985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. [The radiation protective devices for interventional procedures using computed tomography].
Iida H; Chabatake M; Shimizu M; Tamura S
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2002 Jan; 58(1):101-8. PubMed ID: 12527880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A New Design of a Lead-Acrylic Shield for Staff Dose Reduction in Radial and Femoral Access Coronary Catheterization.
Eder H; Seidenbusch MC; Treitl M; Gilligan P
Rofo; 2015 Oct; 187(10):915-23. PubMed ID: 26085177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparing strategies for operator eye protection in the interventional radiology suite.
Thornton RH; Dauer LT; Altamirano JP; Alvarado KJ; St Germain J; Solomon SB
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2010 Nov; 21(11):1703-7. PubMed ID: 20920841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reduction of scatter radiation during transradial percutaneous coronary angiography: a randomized trial using a lead-free radiation shield.
Politi L; Biondi-Zoccai G; Nocetti L; Costi T; Monopoli D; Rossi R; Sgura F; Modena MG; Sangiorgi GM
Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2012 Jan; 79(1):97-102. PubMed ID: 21520391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. [Radiation dose to the operator's hands during non-vascular radiology involving surgical technique-comparison between under-table method and over-table method].
Nakano T
Nihon Hoshasen Gijutsu Gakkai Zasshi; 2008 Oct; 64(10):1235-40. PubMed ID: 18987415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of angiography table shields and height on patient and angiographer irradiation during interventional radiology procedures.
d'Othée BJ; Lin PJ
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2007; 30(3):448-54. PubMed ID: 17278031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT fluoroscopy shielding: decreases in scattered radiation for the patient and operator.
Neeman Z; Dromi SA; Sarin S; Wood BJ
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Dec; 17(12):1999-2004. PubMed ID: 17185699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Correlation between scatter radiation dose at height of operator's eye and dose to patient for different angiographic projections.
Leyton F; Nogueira MS; Gubolino LA; Pivetta MR; Ubeda C
Appl Radiat Isot; 2016 Nov; 117():100-105. PubMed ID: 26857629
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reduction of operator radiation dose by an extended lower body shield.
Gonzales JP; Moran C; Silberzweig JE
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2014 Mar; 25(3):462-8, 468.e1. PubMed ID: 24332242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Determination of minimum effective height of transparent radiation face shielding for fluoroscopy.
Prater S; Rees CR; Bruner A; Savage C
Health Phys; 2011 Nov; 101 Suppl 3():S135-41. PubMed ID: 21968819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monte Carlo study of the scattered radiation field near the eyes of the operator in interventional procedures.
Ferrari P; Becker F; Carinou E; Chumak V; Farah J; Jovanovic Z; Krstic D; Morgun A; Principi S; Teles P
J Radiol Prot; 2016 Dec; 36(4):902-921. PubMed ID: 27861170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effects of device position on the operator's radiation dose when using a handheld portable X-ray device.
Makdissi J; Pawar RR; Johnson B; Chong BS
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(3):20150245. PubMed ID: 26764582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Radiation exposure benefit of a lead cap in invasive cardiology.
Kuon E; Birkel J; Schmitt M; Dahm JB
Heart; 2003 Oct; 89(10):1205-10. PubMed ID: 12975420
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is lead shielding of patients necessary during fluoroscopic procedures? A study based on kyphoplasty.
Smith JR; Marsh RM; Silosky MS
Skeletal Radiol; 2018 Jan; 47(1):37-43. PubMed ID: 28821928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Estimating head and neck tissue dose from x-ray scatter to physicians performing x-ray guided cardiovascular procedures: a phantom study.
Fetterly KA; Schueler BA; Grams MP; Sturchio GM
J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):43-58. PubMed ID: 27941226
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Fluoroscopically guided percutaneous vertebroplasty: assessment of radiation doses and implementation of procedural routines to reduce operator exposure.
von Wrangel A; Cederblad A; Rodriguez-Catarino M
Acta Radiol; 2009 Jun; 50(5):490-6. PubMed ID: 19363715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of radiation dose to operator between transradial and transfemoral coronary angiography with optimised radiation protection: a phantom study.
Liu H; Jin Z; Jing L
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2014 Mar; 158(4):412-20. PubMed ID: 24162374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Radiation exposure to interventional radiologists during manual-injection digital subtraction angiography.
Hayashi N; Sakai T; Kitagawa M; Inagaki R; Yamamoto T; Fukushima T; Ishii Y
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 1998; 21(3):240-3. PubMed ID: 9626442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
