These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

92 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10584786)

  • 1. CT of the brain: a comparison of transportable and fixed-platform scanners.
    Mayo-Smith WW; Davis LM; Clements NC; Cobb CM; Smith WJ; Tung GA
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Dec; 173(6):1481-4. PubMed ID: 10584786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Transportable versus fixed platform CT scanners: comparison of costs.
    Mayo-Smith WW; Rhea JT; Smith WJ; Cobb CM; Gareen IF; Dorfman GS
    Radiology; 2003 Jan; 226(1):63-8. PubMed ID: 12511669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Multi-detector row CT artifacts that mimic disease.
    Cody DD; Stevens DM; Ginsberg LE
    Radiology; 2005 Sep; 236(3):756-61. PubMed ID: 16055698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Portable CT: assessing thoracic disease in the intensive care unit.
    White CS; Meyer CA; Wu J; Mirvis SE
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Nov; 173(5):1351-6. PubMed ID: 10541117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Motion Artifacts on CT Images Obtained in the Ultrafast Scan Mode and Conventional Scan Mode for Unconscious Patients in the Emergency Department.
    Takayanagi T; Suzuki S; Katada Y; Ishikawa T; Fukui R; Yamamoto Y; Abe O
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2019 Oct; 213(4):W153-W161. PubMed ID: 31166767
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. State-of-the-art mobile head CT scanner delivers nearly the same image quality as a conventional stationary CT scanner.
    Goertz L; Al-Sewaidi Y; Habib M; Zopfs D; Reichardt B; Ranft A; Kabbasch C
    Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6393. PubMed ID: 38493258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electrocardiographically gated thin-section CT of the lung.
    Schoepf UJ; Becker CR; Bruening RD; Helmberger T; Staebler A; Leimeister P; Reiser MF
    Radiology; 1999 Sep; 212(3):649-54. PubMed ID: 10478227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Single-detector helical CT in PET-CT: assessment of image quality.
    Römer W; Chung M; Chan A; Townsend DW; Torok F; McCook B; Federle MP; Avril N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2004 Jun; 182(6):1571-7. PubMed ID: 15150012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quality assurance for abdominal CT: a rapid, computer-assisted technique.
    Pomerantz SM; Daly B; Krebs TL; NessAiver M; Kepes SY; Wong JJ; Severson M; Siegler C
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1996 Nov; 167(5):1141-5. PubMed ID: 8911167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of image quality between a novel mobile CT scanner and current generation stationary CT scanners.
    Andersson H; Tamaddon A; Malekian M; Ydström K; Siemund R; Ullberg T; Wasselius J
    Neuroradiology; 2023 Mar; 65(3):503-512. PubMed ID: 36441234
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Coronal reformations of the chest on 64-row multi-detector row CT: evaluation of image quality in comparison with 16-, 8- and 4-row multi-detector row CT.
    Nishino M; Kubo T; Kataoka ML; Raptopoulos V; Hatabu H
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Aug; 59(2):231-7. PubMed ID: 16567075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Use of automatic tube current modulation with a standardized noise index in young children undergoing chest computed tomography scans with 64-slice multidetector computed tomography.
    Peng Y; Li J; Ma D; Zhang Q; Liu Y; Zeng J; Sun G
    Acta Radiol; 2009 Dec; 50(10):1175-81. PubMed ID: 19922316
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Echoplanar MR imaging for ultrafast detection of brain lesions.
    Patel MR; Siewert B; Klufas R; Yousuf N; Edelman RR; Warach S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1999 Aug; 173(2):479-85. PubMed ID: 10430158
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of examination times between CT scanners: are the newer scanners faster?
    Herts BR; Perl J; Seney C; Lieber ML; Davros WJ; Baker ME
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1998 Jan; 170(1):13-8. PubMed ID: 9423589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Image quality of spiral CT versus conventional CT in routine brain imaging.
    Kuntz R; Skalej M; Stefanou A
    Eur J Radiol; 1998 Feb; 26(3):235-40. PubMed ID: 9587747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of two iterative techniques for reducing metal artifacts in computed tomography.
    Boas FE; Fleischmann D
    Radiology; 2011 Jun; 259(3):894-902. PubMed ID: 21357521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Automated 3-dimensional elastic registration of whole-body PET and CT from separate or combined scanners.
    Shekhar R; Walimbe V; Raja S; Zagrodsky V; Kanvinde M; Wu G; Bybel B
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Sep; 46(9):1488-96. PubMed ID: 16157532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CT chest and gantry rotation time: does the rotation time influence image quality?
    Beeres M; Wichmann JL; Paul J; Mbalisike E; Elsabaie M; Vogl TJ; Nour-Eldin NE
    Acta Radiol; 2015 Aug; 56(8):950-4. PubMed ID: 25140057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Building an orthopaedic CT phantom for under £50.
    Tins B; Kuiper JH
    Br J Radiol; 2019 Feb; 92(1094):20180279. PubMed ID: 30379580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Multi-detector row CT attenuation measurements: assessment of intra- and interscanner variability with an anthropomorphic body CT phantom.
    Birnbaum BA; Hindman N; Lee J; Babb JS
    Radiology; 2007 Jan; 242(1):109-19. PubMed ID: 17185663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.