These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10587218)

  • 1. The development of target-eye-view maps for selection of coplanar or noncoplanar beams in conformal radiotherapy treatment planning.
    Cho BC; Roa WH; Robinson D; Murray B
    Med Phys; 1999 Nov; 26(11):2367-72. PubMed ID: 10587218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Computer-assisted selection of coplanar beam orientations in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Pugachev A; Xing L
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Sep; 46(9):2467-76. PubMed ID: 11580182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A case study comparing the relative benefit of optimizing beam weights, wedge angles, beam orientations and tomotherapy in stereotactic radiotherapy of the brain.
    Oldham M; Khoo VS; Rowbottom CG; Bedford JL; Webb S
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Aug; 43(8):2123-46. PubMed ID: 9725594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Benefit of using biologic parameters (EUD and NTCP) in IMRT optimization for treatment of intrahepatic tumors.
    Thomas E; Chapet O; Kessler ML; Lawrence TS; Ten Haken RK
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Jun; 62(2):571-8. PubMed ID: 15890602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Conformal radiation therapy with fixed shaped coplanar or noncoplanar radiation beam bouquets: a possible alternative to radiosurgery.
    Marks LB; Sherouse GW; Das S; Bentel GC; Spencer DP; Turner D
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1209-19. PubMed ID: 7493845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Development of methods for beam angle optimization for IMRT using an accelerated exhaustive search strategy.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Wu Q; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Nov; 60(4):1325-37. PubMed ID: 15519806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Optically guided intensity modulated radiotherapy.
    Tomé WA; Meeks SL; McNutt TR; Buatti JM; Bova FJ; Friedman WA; Mehta M
    Radiother Oncol; 2001 Oct; 61(1):33-44. PubMed ID: 11578726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An optimized forward-planning technique for intensity modulated radiation therapy.
    Xiao Y; Galvin J; Hossain M; Valicenti R
    Med Phys; 2000 Sep; 27(9):2093-9. PubMed ID: 11011738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Pseudo beam's-eye-view as applied to beam orientation selection in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Pugachev A; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2001 Dec; 51(5):1361-70. PubMed ID: 11728698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effectiveness of noncoplanar IMRT planning using a parallelized multiresolution beam angle optimization method for paranasal sinus carcinoma.
    Wang X; Zhang X; Dong L; Liu H; Gillin M; Ahamad A; Ang K; Mohan R
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2005 Oct; 63(2):594-601. PubMed ID: 16168851
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Advanced interactive planning techniques for conformal therapy: high level beam descriptions and volumetric mapping techniques.
    McShan DL; Kessler ML; Fraass BA
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 1995 Dec; 33(5):1061-72. PubMed ID: 7493832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of inverse-planned three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy and intensity-modulated radiotherapy for non-small-cell lung cancer.
    Christian JA; Bedford JL; Webb S; Brada M
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2007 Mar; 67(3):735-41. PubMed ID: 17187941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Geometrical pre-planning for conformal radiotherapy.
    Tsougos I; Schreibmann E; Lahanas M; Theodorou K; Kappas C; Baltas D
    Acta Oncol; 2007; 46(7):918-27. PubMed ID: 17851850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Methods for monitor-unit-preserving adaptation of intensity modulated arc therapy techniques to the daily target-A simple comparison.
    Bratengeier K; Oechsner M; Gainey M
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):713-20. PubMed ID: 22320781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Constrained customization of non-coplanar beam orientations in radiotherapy of brain tumours.
    Rowbottom CG; Oldham M; Webb S
    Phys Med Biol; 1999 Feb; 44(2):383-99. PubMed ID: 10070789
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Simultaneous beam geometry and intensity map optimization in intensity-modulated radiation therapy.
    Lee EK; Fox T; Crocker I
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Jan; 64(1):301-20. PubMed ID: 16289912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dosimetric comparison between intensity-modulated with coplanar field and 3D conformal radiotherapy with noncoplanar field for postocular invasion tumor.
    Wenyong T; Lu L; Jun Z; Weidong Y; Yun L
    Med Dosim; 2010; 35(2):128-34. PubMed ID: 19931025
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. iCycle: Integrated, multicriterial beam angle, and profile optimization for generation of coplanar and noncoplanar IMRT plans.
    Breedveld S; Storchi PR; Voet PW; Heijmen BJ
    Med Phys; 2012 Feb; 39(2):951-63. PubMed ID: 22320804
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Beam's-eye-view Dosimetrics-guided inverse planning for aperture-modulated arc therapy.
    Ma Y; Popple R; Suh TS; Xing L
    Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Dec; 75(5):1587-95. PubMed ID: 19733446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Automatic selection of non-coplanar beam directions for three-dimensional conformal radiotherapy.
    Meyer J; Hummel SM; Cho PS; Austin-Seymour MM; Phillips MH
    Br J Radiol; 2005 Apr; 78(928):316-27. PubMed ID: 15774592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.