These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

128 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10587590)

  • 1. The Herbst appliance and the incidence of recidivism.
    Fränkel R
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Dec; 116(6):16A-9A. PubMed ID: 10587590
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Temporomandibular joint remodeling in adolescents and young adults during Herbst treatment: A prospective longitudinal magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric radiographic investigation.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1999 Jun; 115(6):607-18. PubMed ID: 10358242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Auxologic categorization and chronobiologic specification for the choice of appropriate orthodontic treatment.
    Petrovic A
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1994 Feb; 105(2):192-205. PubMed ID: 8311041
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Temporomandibular joint growth adaptation in Herbst treatment: a prospective magnetic resonance imaging and cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Aug; 20(4):375-88. PubMed ID: 9753819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. CT-scanning and radiographic analysis of temporomandibular joints and cephalometric analysis in a case of Herbst treatment in late puberty.
    Paulsen HU; Karle A; Bakke M; Herskind A
    Eur J Orthod; 1995 Jun; 17(3):165-75. PubMed ID: 7621919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. "Effective" TMJ and chin position changes in Class II treatment.
    Serbesis-Tsarudis C; Pancherz H
    Angle Orthod; 2008 Sep; 78(5):813-8. PubMed ID: 18298212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Computer tomographic and radiographic changes in the temporomandibular joints of two young adults with occlusal asymmetry, treated with the Herbst appliance.
    Paulsen HU; Karle A
    Eur J Orthod; 2000 Dec; 22(6):649-56. PubMed ID: 11212600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Effective temporomandibular joint growth and chin position changes: Activator versus Herbst treatment. A cephalometric roentgenographic study.
    Baltromejus S; Ruf S; Pancherz H
    Eur J Orthod; 2002 Dec; 24(6):627-37. PubMed ID: 12512780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The effect of a Clark twin block on mandibular motion: a case report.
    O'Shea C; Quick A; Johnson G; Carman A; Herbison P
    Aust Orthod J; 2010 Nov; 26(2):189-94. PubMed ID: 21175031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Mandibular growth, condyle position and Fränkel appliance therapy.
    Gianelly AA; Brosnan P; Martignoni M; Bernstein L
    Angle Orthod; 1983 Apr; 53(2):131-42. PubMed ID: 6576652
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Improved clinical use of Twin-block and Herbst as a result of radiating viscoelastic tissue forces on the condyle and fossa in treatment and long-term retention: growth relativity.
    Voudouris JC; Kuftinec MM
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2000 Mar; 117(3):247-66. PubMed ID: 10715086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Current Herbst appliance therapy.
    White LW
    J Clin Orthod; 1994 May; 28(5):296-309. PubMed ID: 8613509
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Herbst Appliance fixed-functional appliance Class II skeletal malocclusion.
    Rondeau B
    J Gen Orthod; 2001; 12(3):7-17. PubMed ID: 11692451
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [The Herbst appliance. II].
    Schiavoni R
    Dent Cadmos; 1986 Oct; 54(15):17-40. PubMed ID: 3471534
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The twin block appliance.
    Rondeau B
    Funct Orthod; 1995; 12(2):6-14, 16-21. PubMed ID: 8613116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The acrylic-splint Herbst appliance: a cephalometric evaluation.
    Windmiller EC
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Jul; 104(1):73-84. PubMed ID: 8322726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Maxillary molar distalization or mandibular enhancement: a cephalometric comparison of comprehensive orthodontic treatment including the pendulum and the Herbst appliances.
    Burkhardt DR; McNamara JA; Baccetti T
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2003 Feb; 123(2):108-16. PubMed ID: 12594414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Change in mandibular growth direction by means of a Herbst appliance? A case report.
    Hägg U
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1992 Nov; 102(5):456-63. PubMed ID: 1476112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Treatment of identical twins with Frankel and Herbst appliances: a comparison of results.
    Pangrazio-Kulbersh V; Berger JL
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 1993 Feb; 103(2):131-7. PubMed ID: 8427217
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Morphological changes of the TMJ condyles of 100 patients treated with the Herbst appliance in the period of puberty to adulthood: a long-term radiographic study.
    Paulsen HU
    Eur J Orthod; 1997 Dec; 19(6):657-68. PubMed ID: 9458599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.