295 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10591338)
1. Continuing screening mammography in women aged 70 to 79 years: impact on life expectancy and cost-effectiveness.
Kerlikowske K; Salzmann P; Phillips KA; Cauley JA; Cummings SR
JAMA; 1999 Dec; 282(22):2156-63. PubMed ID: 10591338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost-effectiveness of extending screening mammography guidelines to include women 40 to 49 years of age.
Salzmann P; Kerlikowske K; Phillips K
Ann Intern Med; 1997 Dec; 127(11):955-65. PubMed ID: 9412300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Tailoring Breast Cancer Screening Intervals by Breast Density and Risk for Women Aged 50 Years or Older: Collaborative Modeling of Screening Outcomes.
Trentham-Dietz A; Kerlikowske K; Stout NK; Miglioretti DL; Schechter CB; Ergun MA; van den Broek JJ; Alagoz O; Sprague BL; van Ravesteyn NT; Near AM; Gangnon RE; Hampton JM; Chandler Y; de Koning HJ; Mandelblatt JS; Tosteson AN;
Ann Intern Med; 2016 Nov; 165(10):700-712. PubMed ID: 27548583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a quality-controlled mammography screening program from the Swiss statutory health-care perspective: quantitative assessment of the most influential factors.
Neeser K; Szucs T; Bulliard JL; Bachmann G; Schramm W
Value Health; 2007; 10(1):42-53. PubMed ID: 17261115
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Toward optimal screening strategies for older women. Costs, benefits, and harms of breast cancer screening by age, biology, and health status.
Mandelblatt JS; Schechter CB; Yabroff KR; Lawrence W; Dignam J; Extermann M; Fox S; Orosz G; Silliman R; Cullen J; Balducci L;
J Gen Intern Med; 2005 Jun; 20(6):487-96. PubMed ID: 15987322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening in women on dialysis.
Wong G; Howard K; Chapman JR; Craig JC
Am J Kidney Dis; 2008 Nov; 52(5):916-29. PubMed ID: 18789566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Personalizing mammography by breast density and other risk factors for breast cancer: analysis of health benefits and cost-effectiveness.
Schousboe JT; Kerlikowske K; Loh A; Cummings SR
Ann Intern Med; 2011 Jul; 155(1):10-20. PubMed ID: 21727289
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cost-effectiveness of annual versus biennial screening mammography for women with high mammographic breast density.
Pataky R; Ismail Z; Coldman AJ; Elwood M; Gelmon K; Hedden L; Hislop G; Kan L; McCoy B; Olivotto IA; Peacock S
J Med Screen; 2014 Dec; 21(4):180-8. PubMed ID: 25186116
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Cost-effectiveness of digital mammography screening before the age of 50 in The Netherlands.
Sankatsing VD; Heijnsdijk EA; van Luijt PA; van Ravesteyn NT; Fracheboud J; de Koning HJ
Int J Cancer; 2015 Oct; 137(8):1990-9. PubMed ID: 25895135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness of Screening Mammography Beyond Age 75 Years : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Schousboe JT; Sprague BL; Abraham L; O'Meara ES; Onega T; Advani S; Henderson LM; Wernli KJ; Zhang D; Miglioretti DL; Braithwaite D; Kerlikowske K
Ann Intern Med; 2022 Jan; 175(1):11-19. PubMed ID: 34807717
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Incorporating Baseline Breast Density When Screening Women at Average Risk for Breast Cancer : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
Shih YT; Dong W; Xu Y; Etzioni R; Shen Y
Ann Intern Med; 2021 May; 174(5):602-612. PubMed ID: 33556275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Benefits, harms and costs of screening mammography in women 70 years and over: a systematic review.
Barratt AL; Les Irwig M; Glasziou PP; Salkeld GP; Houssami N
Med J Aust; 2002 Mar; 176(6):266-71. PubMed ID: 11999259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost effectiveness of mammography screening for Chinese women.
Wong IO; Kuntz KM; Cowling BJ; Lam CL; Leung GM
Cancer; 2007 Aug; 110(4):885-95. PubMed ID: 17607668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Mammography screening for older women with and without cognitive impairment.
Messecar DC
J Gerontol Nurs; 2000 Apr; 26(4):14-24; quiz 52-3. PubMed ID: 11272962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Benefits, harms, and cost-effectiveness of supplemental ultrasonography screening for women with dense breasts.
Sprague BL; Stout NK; Schechter C; van Ravesteyn NT; Cevik M; Alagoz O; Lee CI; van den Broek JJ; Miglioretti DL; Mandelblatt JS; de Koning HJ; Kerlikowske K; Lehman CD; Tosteson AN
Ann Intern Med; 2015 Feb; 162(3):157-66. PubMed ID: 25486550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Program-specific cost-effectiveness analysis: breast cancer screening policies for a safety-net program.
Melnikow J; Tancredi DJ; Yang Z; Ritley D; Jiang Y; Slee C; Popova S; Rylett P; Knutson K; Smalley S
Value Health; 2013; 16(6):932-41. PubMed ID: 24041343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Cost-effectiveness of treatment of women aged 70 years and older with both osteopenia and microstructural deterioration.
Liew D; Chapurlat RD; Sornay-Rendu E; Lespessailles E; Peng Y; Seeman E
Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115682. PubMed ID: 33039577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A Multigene Test Could Cost-Effectively Help Extend Life Expectancy for Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast Cancer.
Li Y; Arellano AR; Bare LA; Bender RA; Strom CM; Devlin JJ
Value Health; 2017 Apr; 20(4):547-555. PubMed ID: 28407996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
