These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10591347)

  • 1. Advantages of a new miniature hearing aid for mild to moderate hearing loss.
    Goode RL; Krusemark J
    Laryngoscope; 1999 Dec; 109(12):1919-23. PubMed ID: 10591347
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Active middle ear implant compared with open-fit hearing aid in sloping high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss.
    Boeheim K; Pok SM; Schloegel M; Filzmoser P
    Otol Neurotol; 2010 Apr; 31(3):424-9. PubMed ID: 20042907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital hearing aids for high-frequency sensorineural hearing loss: preliminary experience with the RetroX device.
    Barbara M; Bandiera G; Serra B; Marrone V; Tarentini S; Pinna JC; Ronchetti F; Graziadio M; Monini S
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jul; 125(7):693-6. PubMed ID: 16012028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Performance-Perceptual Test (PPT) and its relationship to aided reported handicap and hearing aid satisfaction.
    Saunders GH; Forsline A
    Ear Hear; 2006 Jun; 27(3):229-42. PubMed ID: 16672792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Hearing aid accessories for adults: the remote FM microphone.
    Boothroyd A
    Ear Hear; 2004 Feb; 25(1):22-33. PubMed ID: 14770015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Advantages of binaural hearing provided through bimodal stimulation via a cochlear implant and a conventional hearing aid: a 6-month comparative study.
    Morera C; Manrique M; Ramos A; Garcia-Ibanez L; Cavalle L; Huarte A; Castillo C; Estrada E
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2005 Jun; 125(6):596-606. PubMed ID: 16076708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Amplification in the rehabilitation of unilateral deafness: speech in noise and directional hearing effects with bone-anchored hearing and contralateral routing of signal amplification.
    Lin LM; Bowditch S; Anderson MJ; May B; Cox KM; Niparko JK
    Otol Neurotol; 2006 Feb; 27(2):172-82. PubMed ID: 16436986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effects of high-frequency amplification on the objective and subjective performance of hearing instrument users with varying degrees of high-frequency hearing loss.
    Plyler PN; Fleck EL
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Jun; 49(3):616-27. PubMed ID: 16787899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Standard cochlear implantation of adults with residual low-frequency hearing: implications for combined electro-acoustic stimulation.
    Novak MA; Black JM; Koch DB
    Otol Neurotol; 2007 Aug; 28(5):609-14. PubMed ID: 17514064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Vibrant soundbridge versus conventional hearing aid in sensorineural high-frequency hearing loss: a prospective study.
    Truy E; Philibert B; Vesson JF; Labassi S; Collet L
    Otol Neurotol; 2008 Aug; 29(5):684-7. PubMed ID: 18434928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Speech recognition threshold in noise: effects of hearing loss, frequency response, and speech materials.
    Van Tasell DJ; Yanz JL
    J Speech Hear Res; 1987 Sep; 30(3):377-86. PubMed ID: 3669644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. [Measurements of directional hearing aid function].
    Prosser S; Biasiolo R
    Acta Otorhinolaryngol Ital; 1998 Apr; 18(2):70-3. PubMed ID: 9844215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Unilateral and bilateral hearing aids, spatial release from masking and auditory acclimatization.
    Dawes P; Munro KJ; Kalluri S; Edwards B
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):596-606. PubMed ID: 23862834
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Speech perception for adults who use hearing aids in conjunction with cochlear implants in opposite ears.
    Mok M; Grayden D; Dowell RC; Lawrence D
    J Speech Lang Hear Res; 2006 Apr; 49(2):338-51. PubMed ID: 16671848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Unaided and aided performance with a directional open-fit hearing aid.
    Valente M; Mispagel KM
    Int J Audiol; 2008 Jun; 47(6):329-36. PubMed ID: 18569105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Rehabilitation for high-frequency sensorineural hearing impairment in adults with the symphonix vibrant soundbridge: a comparative study.
    Uziel A; Mondain M; Hagen P; Dejean F; Doucet G
    Otol Neurotol; 2003 Sep; 24(5):775-83. PubMed ID: 14501456
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of noise source configuration on directional benefit using symmetric and asymmetric directional hearing aid fittings.
    Hornsby BW; Ricketts TA
    Ear Hear; 2007 Apr; 28(2):177-86. PubMed ID: 17496669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effectiveness of an affordable hearing aid with elderly persons.
    McPherson B; Wong ET
    Disabil Rehabil; 2005 Jun; 27(11):601-9. PubMed ID: 16019870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Bilateral vibrant soundbridge implantation: audiologic and subjective benefits in quiet and noisy environments.
    Garin P; Schmerber S; Magnan J; Truy E; Uziel A; Triglia JM; Bebear JP; Labassi S; Lavieille JP
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2010 Dec; 130(12):1370-8. PubMed ID: 20819026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. BAHA in children and adolescents with unilateral or bilateral conductive hearing loss: a study of outcome.
    Priwin C; Jönsson R; Hultcrantz M; Granström G
    Int J Pediatr Otorhinolaryngol; 2007 Jan; 71(1):135-45. PubMed ID: 17092570
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.