297 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10594296)
1. Identification of metal allergens in the local lymph node assay.
Basketter DA; Lea LJ; Cooper KJ; Ryan CA; Gerberick GF; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):207-12. PubMed ID: 10594296
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Contact allergenic potency: correlation of human and local lymph node assay data.
Gerberick GF; Robinson MK; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA; Wright Z; Marks JG
Am J Contact Dermat; 2001 Sep; 12(3):156-61. PubMed ID: 11526521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Local lymph node assay: validation assessment for regulatory purposes.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kimber I; Dearman RJ; Lea LJ; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 2000 Mar; 11(1):3-18. PubMed ID: 10684384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predictive identification of human skin sensitization thresholds.
Basketter DA; Clapp C; Jefferies D; Safford B; Ryan CA; Gerberick F; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2005 Nov; 53(5):260-7. PubMed ID: 16283904
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Novel approach for classifying chemicals according to skin sensitizing potency by non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Iida K; Shiraishi K; Hoshuyama S
J Appl Toxicol; 2005; 25(2):129-34. PubMed ID: 15744759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Local lymph node assay (LLNA) for detection of sensitization capacity of chemicals.
Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Methods; 2007 Jan; 41(1):54-60. PubMed ID: 16938465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Skin sensitization potency of methyl methacrylate in the local lymph node assay: comparisons with guinea-pig data and human experience.
Betts CJ; Dearman RJ; Heylings JR; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Contact Dermatitis; 2006 Sep; 55(3):140-7. PubMed ID: 16918612
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The impact of vehicle on assessment of relative skin sensitization potency of 1,4-dihydroquinone in the local lymph node assay.
Lea LJ; Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Basketter DA
Am J Contact Dermat; 1999 Dec; 10(4):213-8. PubMed ID: 10594297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Development of a peptide reactivity assay for screening contact allergens.
Gerberick GF; Vassallo JD; Bailey RE; Chaney JG; Morrall SW; Lepoittevin JP
Toxicol Sci; 2004 Oct; 81(2):332-43. PubMed ID: 15254333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative relationship between the local lymph node assay and human skin sensitization assays.
Schneider K; Akkan Z
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2004 Jun; 39(3):245-55. PubMed ID: 15135206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Nothing is perfect, not even the local lymph node assay: a commentary and the implications for REACH.
Basketter DA; McFadden JF; Gerberick F; Cockshott A; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2009 Feb; 60(2):65-9. PubMed ID: 19207375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of the skin sensitization potency of eugenol and its dimers using a non-radioisotopic modification of the local lymph node assay.
Takeyoshi M; Noda S; Yamazaki S; Kakishima H; Yamasaki K; Kimber I
J Appl Toxicol; 2004; 24(1):77-81. PubMed ID: 14745850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The impact of vehicle on the relative potency of skin-sensitizing chemicals in the local lymph node assay.
Jowsey IR; Clapp CJ; Safford B; Gibbons BT; Basketter DA
Cutan Ocul Toxicol; 2008; 27(2):67-75. PubMed ID: 18568891
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The local lymph node assay and skin sensitization testing.
Kimber I; Dearman RJ
Methods Mol Biol; 2010; 598():221-31. PubMed ID: 19967517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals.
Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M
J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The use of ethanol:diethylphthalate as a vehicle for the local lymph node assay.
Betts CJ; Beresford L; Dearman RJ; Lalko J; Api AP; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Feb; 56(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17244073
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparative analysis of skin sensitization potency of acrylates (methyl acrylate, ethyl acrylate, butyl acrylate, and ethylhexyl acrylate) using the local lymph node assay.
Dearman RJ; Betts CJ; Farr C; McLaughlin J; Berdasco N; Wiench K; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Oct; 57(4):242-7. PubMed ID: 17868217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The local lymph node assay and the assessment of relative potency: status of validation.
Basketter DA; Gerberick F; Kimber I
Contact Dermatitis; 2007 Aug; 57(2):70-5. PubMed ID: 17627643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prediction of drug allergenicity: possible use of the local lymph node assay.
Warbrick EV; Dearman RJ; Kimber I
Curr Opin Drug Discov Devel; 2001 Jan; 4(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 11727324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. ICCVAM evaluation of the murine local lymph node assay. Data analyses completed by the National Toxicology Program Interagency Center for the Evaluation of Alternative Toxicological Methods.
Haneke KE; Tice RR; Carson BL; Margolin BH; Stokes WS
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2001 Dec; 34(3):274-86. PubMed ID: 11754531
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
