These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10595401)

  • 21. Clinical assessment of a new real time 3D quantitative coronary angiography system: evaluation in stented vessel segments.
    Gradaus R; Mathies K; Breithardt G; Böcker D
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2006 Jul; 68(1):44-9. PubMed ID: 16770813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. A novel three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography system: In-vivo comparison with intravascular ultrasound for assessing arterial segment length.
    Tu S; Huang Z; Koning G; Cui K; Reiber JH
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2010 Aug; 76(2):291-8. PubMed ID: 20665880
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Comparison of two- and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography to intravascular ultrasound in the assessment of intermediate left main stenosis.
    Porto I; Dato I; Todaro D; Calabrese M; Rigattieri S; Leone AM; Niccoli G; Burzotta F; Trani C; Crea F
    Am J Cardiol; 2012 Jun; 109(11):1600-7. PubMed ID: 22424580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Three-dimensional coronary reconstruction from routine single-plane coronary angiograms: in vivo quantitative validation.
    Dvir D; Marom H; Guetta V; Kornowski R
    Int J Cardiovasc Intervent; 2005; 7(3):141-5. PubMed ID: 16243736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. A quantitative evaluation of the three dimensional reconstruction of patients' coronary arteries.
    Klein JL; Hoff JG; Peifer JW; Folks R; Cooke CD; King SB; Garcia EV
    Int J Card Imaging; 1998 Apr; 14(2):75-87. PubMed ID: 9617637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Viewpoint planning for quantitative coronary angiography.
    Preuhs A; Berger M; Bauer S; Redel T; Unberath M; Achenbach S; Maier A
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2018 Aug; 13(8):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 29858733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Comparison of QCA systems.
    Dietz U; Rupprecht HJ; Brennecke R; Fritsch HP; Woltmann J; Blankenberg S; Meyer J
    Int J Card Imaging; 1997 Aug; 13(4):271-80. PubMed ID: 9306141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Angiographic views used for percutaneous coronary interventions: a three-dimensional analysis of physician-determined vs. computer-generated views.
    Green NE; Chen SY; Hansgen AR; Messenger JC; Groves BM; Carroll JD
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2005 Apr; 64(4):451-9. PubMed ID: 15744720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Two and three-dimensional quantitative coronary angiography.
    Pantos I; Efstathopoulos EP; Katritsis DG
    Cardiol Clin; 2009 Aug; 27(3):491-502. PubMed ID: 19573720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Quantification of lumen stenoses with known dimensions by conventional angiography and computed tomography: implications of using conventional angiography as gold standard.
    Arbab-Zadeh A; Texter J; Ostbye KM; Kitagawa K; Brinker J; George RT; Miller JM; Trost JC; Lange RA; Lima JA; Lardo AC
    Heart; 2010 Sep; 96(17):1358-63. PubMed ID: 20801854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Is quantitative angiography sufficient to guide stent implantation? A comparison with three-dimensional reconstruction of intracoronary ultrasound images.
    Prati F; Gil R; Di Mario C; Ozaki Y; Bruining N; Camenzind E; de Feyter PJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    G Ital Cardiol; 1997 Apr; 27(4):328-36. PubMed ID: 9199951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Performance standards and edge detection with computerized quantitative coronary arteriography. The Lovastatin Restenosis Trial Group.
    Klein JL; Boccuzzi SJ; Treasure CB; Manoukian SV; Vogel RA; Beauman GJ; Fischman D; Savage MP; Weintaub WS
    Am J Cardiol; 1996 Apr; 77(10):815-22. PubMed ID: 8623732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Quantitative measurements of in-stent restenosis: A comparison between quantitative coronary ultrasound and quantitative coronary angiography.
    Bruining N; Sabate M; de Feyter PJ; Kay IP; Ligthart J; Disco C; Kutryk MJ; Roelandt JR; Serruys PW
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 1999 Oct; 48(2):133-42. PubMed ID: 10506766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Evaluation of a personal computer-based quantitative coronary analysis system for rapid assessment of coronary stenoses.
    Alvarez LG; Jackson SA; Berry JA; Eichhorn EJ
    Am Heart J; 1992 Jun; 123(6):1500-10. PubMed ID: 1595529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Calibration-free device sizing using an inverse geometry x-ray system.
    Tomkowiak MT; Speidel MA; Raval AN; Van Lysel MS
    Med Phys; 2011 Jan; 38(1):283-93. PubMed ID: 21361197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Coronary stents: In vitro aspects of an angiographic and ultrasound quantification with in vivo correlation.
    Pomerantsev EV; Kobayashi Y; Fitzgerald PJ; Grube E; Sanders WJ; Alderman EL; Oesterle SN; Yock PG; Stertzer SH
    Circulation; 1998 Oct; 98(15):1495-503. PubMed ID: 9769302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Improved determination of biplane imaging geometry from two projection images and its application to three-dimensional reconstruction of coronary arterial trees.
    Chen SY; Metz CE
    Med Phys; 1997 May; 24(5):633-54. PubMed ID: 9167155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Accuracy of 16-slice multi-detector CT to quantify the degree of coronary artery stenosis: assessment of cross-sectional and longitudinal vessel reconstructions.
    Cury RC; Ferencik M; Achenbach S; Pomerantsev E; Nieman K; Moselewski F; Abbara S; Jang IK; Brady TJ; Hoffmann U
    Eur J Radiol; 2006 Mar; 57(3):345-50. PubMed ID: 16442256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Accurate and robust fully-automatic QCA: method and numerical validation.
    Hernández-Vela A; Gatta C; Escalera S; Igual L; Martin-Yuste V; Radeva P
    Med Image Comput Comput Assist Interv; 2011; 14(Pt 3):496-503. PubMed ID: 22003736
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Comparisons of angiographic core laboratory analyses of phantom and clinical images: interlaboratory variability.
    Beauman GJ; Reiber JH; Koning G; Vogel RA
    Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1996 Jan; 37(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 8770475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.