These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

93 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10596532)

  • 41. Diagnosis of intrauterine growth retardation.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Perinatol; 1988 Jul; 5(3):307. PubMed ID: 3382493
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Antenatal screening of small-for-gestational age infants by symphysial-fundal height measurement.
    Linasmita V
    J Med Assoc Thai; 1985 Nov; 68(11):587-91. PubMed ID: 4086951
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Abnormal growth patterns in diabetes in pregnancy: a longitudinal study.
    Langer O; Kozlowski S; Brustman L
    Isr J Med Sci; 1991; 27(8-9):516-23. PubMed ID: 1960050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. [Placenta and intrauterine growth].
    Westin B
    Lakartidningen; 1980 Jan; 77(5):328-32. PubMed ID: 7366290
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Ultrasonic recognition of the small-for-gestational-age fetus.
    Brown HL; Miller JM; Gabert HA; Kissling G
    Obstet Gynecol; 1987 Apr; 69(4):631-5. PubMed ID: 3547215
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Biometric assessment.
    Kiserud T; Johnsen SL
    Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol; 2009 Dec; 23(6):819-31. PubMed ID: 19632901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. [Attention to clinical study of monochorionic twin pregnancies].
    Wang XT; Li HY
    Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2013 Jun; 48(6):401-4. PubMed ID: 24103116
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Identifying the small-for-gestational-age fetus on the basis of enhanced surfactant production.
    Sher G; Statland BE; Knutzen VK
    Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Jan; 61(1):13-5. PubMed ID: 6687405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Sonographic measurements with umbilical and uterine artery Doppler analysis in suspected intrauterine growth retardation.
    Kay HH; Carroll BB; Dahmus M; Killam AP
    J Reprod Med; 1991 Jan; 36(1):65-8. PubMed ID: 2008005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Predicting poor neonatal outcome: a comparative study of noninvasive antenatal testing methods.
    Dubinsky T; Lau M; Powell F; Garcia J; Mastobattista J; Parvey HR; Sickler K; Maklad N
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 1997 Mar; 168(3):827-31. PubMed ID: 9057543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Early Fetal Growth Restriction.
    Hernandez Castro R; Spiel M
    Neoreviews; 2020 Mar; 21(3):e203-e209. PubMed ID: 32123126
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Small packages.
    Allen V
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2012 Jan; 34(1):11-13. PubMed ID: 22260758
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. An audit of the detection and management of small-for-gestational age babies.
    Grant JM
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1986 Sep; 93(9):1016-7. PubMed ID: 3768282
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Need for differentiation of small-for-gestational-age infants and those with intrauterine growth retardation.
    Goodlin RC
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1989 Apr; 160(4):1024-5. PubMed ID: 2712111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. [Statistical studies on the value of various surveillance methods for the diagnosis and prognosis of "small-for-date" infants (proceedings)].
    Künzig HJ; Geiger W; Kuhn H; Schlensker KH
    Arch Gynakol; 1977 Jul; 224(1-4):121-2. PubMed ID: 579742
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Gestosis index (EPH-gestosis); evaluation for the assessment of prognosis and condition of the newborn.
    Furuhashi N; Tanaka M; Shinkawa O; Kono H; Hiruta M; Takahashi T; Suzuki M
    Asia Oceania J Obstet Gynaecol; 1984 Mar; 10(1):37-40. PubMed ID: 6732622
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Ultrasound. Weighing the propaganda against the facts.
    Beech BL
    Midwifery Today Int Midwife; 1999; (51):31-3. PubMed ID: 10808871
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Is obstetric and neonatal outcome worse in fetuses who fail to reach their own growth potential?
    Gardosi J
    Br J Obstet Gynaecol; 1993 Mar; 100(3):295-6. PubMed ID: 8476841
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Fetal growth velocity: a cautionary tale.
    Bobrow CS; Soothill PW
    Lancet; 1999 May; 353(9163):1460. PubMed ID: 10232308
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Pregnancy-associated plasma protein A for prediction of fetal growth restriction.
    Lo TK; Chan KY; Chan SS; Kan AS; Hui AP; Tang MH
    Int J Gynaecol Obstet; 2015 Aug; 130(2):200. PubMed ID: 25845987
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.