These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1059748)

  • 1. Variation of the sella-nasion plane and its effect on SNA and SNB.
    Moore JW
    J Oral Surg; 1976 Jan; 34(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 1059748
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Orientation-sella-nasion or Frankfort horizontal.
    Ricketts RM; Schulhof RJ; Bagha L
    Am J Orthod; 1976 Jun; 69(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 1064336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
    Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
    J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The relation of the sella nasion to the Frankfurt horizontal line in cephalometric diagnosis].
    Paulus GW; Steinhäuser EW
    Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Nov; 34(11):837-42. PubMed ID: 296719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
    Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
    J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
    Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
    Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
    Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study.
    Trenouth MJ; Laitung G; Naftel AJ
    Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10203217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension.
    Nanda SK
    Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 1554159
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients.
    Zebeib AM; Naini FB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line: a nine-year longitudinal study.
    Huh YJ; Huh KH; Kim HK; Nam SE; Song HY; Lee JH; Park YS
    Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 24001109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. "The pitfalls and merits of using commonly accepted orthodontic cephalometric analyses".
    Murray TM
    J Gen Orthod; 1997 Dec; 8(4):6-17. PubMed ID: 9610305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Vertical facial growth and statural growth in girls: a longitudinal comparison.
    van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
    Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 9009419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies.
    Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 18216691
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Maxillary sagittal and vertical displacement induced by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
    Chung CH; Woo A; Zagarinsky J; Vanarsdall RL; Fonseca RJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 11500655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
    Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
    Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
    Wellens H
    Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
    Järvinen SH
    Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Age-dependant cephalometric standards as determined by multilevel modeling.
    van Diepenbeek AF; Buschang PH; Prahl-Andersen B
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19121505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A new cephalometric parameter to aid in dental base relationship analysis.
    Sarhan OA
    Angle Orthod; 1990; 60(1):59-63. PubMed ID: 2316907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.