148 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 1059748)
1. Variation of the sella-nasion plane and its effect on SNA and SNB.
Moore JW
J Oral Surg; 1976 Jan; 34(1):24-6. PubMed ID: 1059748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Orientation-sella-nasion or Frankfort horizontal.
Ricketts RM; Schulhof RJ; Bagha L
Am J Orthod; 1976 Jun; 69(6):648-54. PubMed ID: 1064336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The angle between the Frankfort horizontal and the sella-nasion line. Changes in porion and orbitale position during growth.
Greiner P; Müller B; Dibbets J
J Orofac Orthop; 2004 May; 65(3):217-22. PubMed ID: 15160248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [The relation of the sella nasion to the Frankfurt horizontal line in cephalometric diagnosis].
Paulus GW; Steinhäuser EW
Dtsch Zahnarztl Z; 1979 Nov; 34(11):837-42. PubMed ID: 296719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. [Orthodonticorthognathic treatment stability in skeletal class III malocclusion patients].
Wang XJ; Zhang YM; Zhou YH
Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2019 Feb; 51(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 30773550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Soft and hard tissue changes after bimaxillary surgery in Turkish female Class III patients.
Marşan G; Cura N; Emekli U
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2009 Jan; 37(1):8-17. PubMed ID: 18786833
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Cephalometric assessment of sagittal jaw base relationship prior to orthognathic surgery: the role of anterior cranial base inclination.
Jünger TH; Ruf S; Eisfeld J; Howaldt HP
Int J Adult Orthodon Orthognath Surg; 2000; 15(4):290-8. PubMed ID: 11307186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validity and reliability of a new edge-based computerized method for identification of cephalometric landmarks.
Kazandjian S; Kiliaridis S; Mavropoulos A
Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):619-24. PubMed ID: 16808568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Differences in cephalometric reference values between five centres: relevance to the Eurocleft Study.
Trenouth MJ; Laitung G; Naftel AJ
Br J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1999 Feb; 37(1):19-24. PubMed ID: 10203217
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Differential growth of the female face in the anteroposterior dimension.
Nanda SK
Angle Orthod; 1992; 62(1):23-34. PubMed ID: 1554159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Variability of the inclination of anatomic horizontal reference planes of the craniofacial complex in relation to the true horizontal line in orthognathic patients.
Zebeib AM; Naini FB
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2014 Dec; 146(6):740-7. PubMed ID: 25432255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Constancy of the angle between the Frankfort horizontal plane and the sella-nasion line: a nine-year longitudinal study.
Huh YJ; Huh KH; Kim HK; Nam SE; Song HY; Lee JH; Park YS
Angle Orthod; 2014 Mar; 84(2):286-91. PubMed ID: 24001109
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. "The pitfalls and merits of using commonly accepted orthodontic cephalometric analyses".
Murray TM
J Gen Orthod; 1997 Dec; 8(4):6-17. PubMed ID: 9610305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Vertical facial growth and statural growth in girls: a longitudinal comparison.
van der Beek MC; Hoeksma JB; Prahl-Andersen B
Eur J Orthod; 1996 Dec; 18(6):549-55. PubMed ID: 9009419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A protocol for cranial base reference in cephalometric studies.
Alves PV; Mazucheli J; Vogel CJ; Bolognese AM
J Craniofac Surg; 2008 Jan; 19(1):211-5. PubMed ID: 18216691
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Maxillary sagittal and vertical displacement induced by surgically assisted rapid palatal expansion.
Chung CH; Woo A; Zagarinsky J; Vanarsdall RL; Fonseca RJ
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2001 Aug; 120(2):144-8. PubMed ID: 11500655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Differences in craniofacial characteristics in Southern Italian children from Naples: a retrospective study by cephalometric analysis.
Perillo L; Isola G; Esercizio D; Iovane M; Triolo G; Matarese G
Eur J Paediatr Dent; 2013 Sep; 14(3):195-8. PubMed ID: 24295003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Improving the concordance between various anteroposterior cephalometric measurements using Procrustes analysis.
Wellens H
Eur J Orthod; 2009 Oct; 31(5):503-15. PubMed ID: 19687148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of the correlation box (Segner) for characterization of the facial skeleton.
Järvinen SH
Proc Finn Dent Soc; 1992; 88(1-2):39-48. PubMed ID: 1470631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Age-dependant cephalometric standards as determined by multilevel modeling.
van Diepenbeek AF; Buschang PH; Prahl-Andersen B
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2009 Jan; 135(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19121505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
