These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10597521)

  • 1. An evaluation of affected-sib-pair methods and transmission/disequilibrium tests for detecting genes underlying a complex trait.
    Shugart YY; Wehman P; Collins A
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S727-30. PubMed ID: 10597521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Further evidence for the increased power of LOD scores compared with nonparametric methods.
    Durner M; Vieland VJ; Greenberg DA
    Am J Hum Genet; 1999 Jan; 64(1):281-9. PubMed ID: 9915967
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. The score statistic of the LD-lod analysis: detecting linkage adaptive to linkage disequilibrium.
    Huang J; Jiang Y
    Hum Hered; 2001; 52(2):83-98. PubMed ID: 11474209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Power of concordant versus discordant sib pairs at different penetrance levels.
    Nicolaou M; Premkumar S; DeStefano AL; Farrer LA; Cupples LA
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S679-84. PubMed ID: 10597513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Improving the power for disease locus detection in affected-sib-pair studies by using two-locus analysis and multiple regression methods.
    Cordell HJ; Jacobs KB; Wedig GC; Elston RC
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S521-6. PubMed ID: 10597486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of age at onset on the power of the affected sib pair and transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Li H; Hsu L
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 May; 64(Pt 3):239-54. PubMed ID: 11246475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Multipoint analysis of quantitative traits.
    Marlow AJ; John S; Worthington J
    Genet Epidemiol; 1997; 14(6):845-50. PubMed ID: 9433588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Hidden linkage: a comparison of the affected sib pair (ASP) test and transmission/disequilibrium test (TDT).
    McGinnis RE
    Ann Hum Genet; 1998 Mar; 62(Pt 2):159-79. PubMed ID: 9759477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Evaluating linkage and linkage disequilibrium: use of excess sharing and transmission disequilibrium methods in affected sib pairs.
    Wicks J; Wilson SR
    Ann Hum Genet; 2000 Sep; 64(Pt 5):419-32. PubMed ID: 11281280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Power comparisons between the TDT and two likelihood-based methods.
    Slager SL; Huang J; Vieland VJ
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Feb; 20(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 11180446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Detecting linkage disequilibrium in the presence of locus heterogeneity.
    Wang D; Huang J
    Ann Hum Genet; 2006 May; 70(Pt 3):397-409. PubMed ID: 16674561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Determining trait locus position from multipoint analysis: accuracy and power of three different statistics.
    Greenberg DA; Abreu PC
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001 Dec; 21(4):299-314. PubMed ID: 11754466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Significant evidence for linkage of a simulated trait to D1G024--a conclusion reached using multiallelic transmission/disequilibrium tests.
    Ziegler A; Hebebrand J; Kastner C; Müller-Myhsok B
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S785-9. PubMed ID: 10597531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The impact of genotyping error on family-based analysis of quantitative traits.
    Abecasis GR; Cherny SS; Cardon LR
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2001 Feb; 9(2):130-4. PubMed ID: 11313746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transmission-disequilibrium tests for quantitative traits.
    Allison DB
    Am J Hum Genet; 1997 Mar; 60(3):676-90. PubMed ID: 9042929
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A sib-pair regression model of linkage disequilibrium for quantitative traits.
    Cardon LR
    Hum Hered; 2000; 50(6):350-8. PubMed ID: 10899753
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Affected sib-pair methods for detecting linkage to dichotomous traits: review of the methodology.
    Holmans P
    Hum Biol; 1998 Dec; 70(6):1025-40. PubMed ID: 9825594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Nonparametric linkage and family-based association studies of a simulated complex disorder.
    Koller DL; Balding J; Foroud T
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S627-32. PubMed ID: 10597504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Strategies for detecting susceptibility genes in a complex disease.
    Babron MC; Barillot E; Margaritte-Jeannin P; Clerget-Darpoux F
    Genet Epidemiol; 1999; 17 Suppl 1():S479-83. PubMed ID: 10597479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The Sib TDT adjusted for age of disease onset.
    Ghosh S; Reich T
    Ann Hum Genet; 2004 May; 68(Pt 3):249-56. PubMed ID: 15180705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.