These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

102 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10598472)

  • 1. Orientation invariance in naming rotated objects: individual differences and repetition priming.
    McKone E; Grenfell T
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1590-603. PubMed ID: 10598472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The role of attention in the shift from orientation-dependent to orientation-invariant identification of disoriented objects.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1995 Jan; 23(1):49-58. PubMed ID: 7885265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Orientation invariance in visual object priming depends on prime-target asynchrony.
    Arguin M; Leek EC
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Apr; 65(3):469-77. PubMed ID: 12785075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Reference frame and effects of orientation on finding the tops of rotated objects.
    McMullen PA; Jolicoeur P
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Aug; 18(3):807-20. PubMed ID: 1500877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Masked repetition and phonological priming in picture naming.
    Ferrand L; Humphreys GW; Segui J
    Percept Psychophys; 1998 Feb; 60(2):263-74. PubMed ID: 9529910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Orientation sensitivity at different stages of object processing: evidence from repetition priming and naming.
    Harris IM; Dux PE; Benito CT; Leek EC
    PLoS One; 2008 May; 3(5):e2256. PubMed ID: 18509451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Priming and habituation for faces: Individual differences and inversion effects.
    Rieth CA; Huber DE
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2010 Jun; 36(3):596-618. PubMed ID: 20515191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Negative priming and perceptual fluency: more than what meets the eye.
    Grison S; Strayer DL
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Aug; 63(6):1063-71. PubMed ID: 11578050
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Orientation-invariant transfer of training in the identification of rotated natural objects.
    Murray JE; Jolicoeur P; McMullen PA; Ingleton M
    Mem Cognit; 1993 Sep; 21(5):604-10. PubMed ID: 8412712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Effects of orientation on the identification of rotated objects depend on the level of identity.
    Hamm JP; McMullen PA
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1998 Apr; 24(2):413-26. PubMed ID: 9606109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Can rotated words be processed automatically? Evidence from rotated repetition priming.
    Benyhe A; Csibri P
    Mem Cognit; 2021 Aug; 49(6):1163-1171. PubMed ID: 33721262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does letter rotation slow down orthographic processing in word recognition?
    Perea M; Marcet A; Fernández-López M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2018 Dec; 25(6):2295-2300. PubMed ID: 29392634
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evidence for complete translational and reflectional invariance in visual object priming.
    Biederman I; Cooper EE
    Perception; 1991; 20(5):585-93. PubMed ID: 1806902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Repetition priming in visual search: episodic retrieval, not feature priming.
    Huang L; Holcombe AO; Pashler H
    Mem Cognit; 2004 Jan; 32(1):12-20. PubMed ID: 15078040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Orientation-specific effects in picture matching and naming.
    Murray JE
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Sep; 27(5):878-89. PubMed ID: 10540816
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Orientation-invariant object recognition: evidence from repetition blindness.
    Harris IM; Dux PE
    Cognition; 2005 Feb; 95(1):73-93. PubMed ID: 15629474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Priming of simple and complex scene layout: rapid function from the intermediate level.
    Sanocki T; Sulman N
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):735-49. PubMed ID: 19485688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Generalization to novel images in upright and inverted faces.
    Moses Y; Ullman S; Edelman S
    Perception; 1996; 25(4):443-61. PubMed ID: 8817621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stereo disparity facilitates view generalization during shape recognition for solid multipart objects.
    Cristino F; Davitt L; Hayward WG; Leek EC
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(12):2419-36. PubMed ID: 25679983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The use of word-picture verification to study entry-level object recognition: further support for view-invariant mechanisms.
    DeCaro SA; Reeves A
    Mem Cognit; 2002 Jul; 30(5):811-21. PubMed ID: 12219897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.