These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10598474)

  • 1. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Stimulus-response compatibility between stimulated eye and response location: implications for attentional accounts of the Simon effect.
    Valle-Inclán F; Hackley SA; De Labra C
    Psychol Res; 2003 Nov; 67(4):240-3. PubMed ID: 12761624
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Increased spatial salience in the social Simon task: a response-coding account of spatial compatibility effects.
    Dittrich K; Rothe A; Klauer KC
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2012 Jul; 74(5):911-29. PubMed ID: 22528612
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The way irrelevant dimensions are processed depends on what they overlap with: the case of Stroop- and Simon-like stimuli.
    Kornblum S
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):130-5. PubMed ID: 8008775
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Effects of irrelevant spatial S-R compatibility depend on stimulus complexity.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 1994; 56(3):179-84. PubMed ID: 8008780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A role for set in the control of automatic spatial response activation.
    Risko EF; Besner D
    Exp Psychol; 2008; 55(1):38-46. PubMed ID: 18271352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Processing irrelevant location information: practice and transfer effects in choice-reaction tasks.
    Proctor RW; Lu CH
    Mem Cognit; 1999 Jan; 27(1):63-77. PubMed ID: 10087857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Interference effects in the Stroop and Simon paradigms.
    O'Leary MJ; Barber PJ
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1993 Aug; 19(4):830-44. PubMed ID: 8409861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Enhanced spatial stimulus-response mapping near the hands: the Simon effect is modulated by hand-stimulus proximity.
    Wang X; Du F; He X; Zhang K
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2014 Dec; 40(6):2252-65. PubMed ID: 25314044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Does right-left prevalence occur for the Simon effect?
    Proctor RW; Vu KP; Nicoletti R
    Percept Psychophys; 2003 Nov; 65(8):1318-29. PubMed ID: 14710965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Decay of stimulus spatial code in horizontal and vertical Simon tasks.
    Vallesi A; Umiltà CA
    J Gen Psychol; 2009 Oct; 136(4):350-73. PubMed ID: 19943610
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Attentional focussing and spatial stimulus-response compatibility.
    Stoffer TH
    Psychol Res; 1991; 53(2):127-35. PubMed ID: 1946872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Determinants of the benefit for consistent spatial mappings in dual-task performance of three-choice tasks.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1771-81. PubMed ID: 19933561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The presence of a nonresponding effector increases inhibition of return.
    Ivanoff J; Klein RM
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2001 Jun; 8(2):307-14. PubMed ID: 11495119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dilution of compatibility effects in Simon-type tasks depends on categorical similarity between distractors and diluters.
    Miles JD; Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Oct; 71(7):1598-606. PubMed ID: 19801619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A feature-integration account of sequential effects in the Simon task.
    Hommel B; Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Psychol Res; 2004 Feb; 68(1):1-17. PubMed ID: 14752663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Stimulus-response compatibility and the Simon effect: toward a conceptual clarification.
    Hasbroucq T; Guiard Y
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1991 Feb; 17(1):246-66. PubMed ID: 1826315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of report order, identification method, and stimulus characteristics on multidimensional stimulus identification.
    Shieh KK; Lai CJ; Ellingstad VS
    Percept Mot Skills; 1996 Feb; 82(1):99-111. PubMed ID: 8668508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.