These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

208 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 10598474)

  • 21. Time course of the Simon effect in pointing movements for horizontal, vertical, and acoustic stimuli: evidence for a common mechanism.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2008 Nov; 129(3):420-8. PubMed ID: 18930170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The role of attention for the Simon effect.
    Hommel B
    Psychol Res; 1993; 55(3):208-22. PubMed ID: 8416040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does irrelevant stimulus location affect response selection?
    Hasbroucq T; Possamaï CA
    Can J Exp Psychol; 1995 Sep; 49(3):349-56. PubMed ID: 9183979
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence of irrelevant information on human performance: effects of S-R association strength and relative timing.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    Q J Exp Psychol A; 2001 Feb; 54(1):95-136. PubMed ID: 11216323
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Conflicts during response selection affect response programming: reactions toward the source of stimulation.
    Buetti S; Kerzel D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Jun; 35(3):816-34. PubMed ID: 19485694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Visual and auditory accessory stimulus offset and the Simon effect.
    Nishimura A; Yokosawa K
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Oct; 72(7):1965-74. PubMed ID: 20952792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Orthogonal cross-task compatibility: abstract spatial coding in dual tasks.
    Koch I; Joucoeur P
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2007 Feb; 14(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 17546730
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Effects of stimulus features and instruction on response coding, selection, and inhibition: evidence from repetition effects under task switching.
    Druey MD; Hübner R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2008 Oct; 61(10):1573-600. PubMed ID: 18777444
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Stimulus-response compatibility for mixed mappings and tasks with unique responses.
    Proctor RW; Vu KP
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2010 Feb; 63(2):320-40. PubMed ID: 19526436
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An effect of spatial-temporal association of response codes: understanding the cognitive representations of time.
    Vallesi A; Binns MA; Shallice T
    Cognition; 2008 May; 107(2):501-27. PubMed ID: 18076872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Contingent attentional capture or delayed allocation of attention?
    Remington RW; Folk CL; McLean JP
    Percept Psychophys; 2001 Feb; 63(2):298-307. PubMed ID: 11281104
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Automatic response activation of implicit spatial information: Evidence from the SNARC effect.
    Gevers W; Lammertyn J; Notebaert W; Verguts T; Fias W
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2006 Jul; 122(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 16423320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Consequences of allocating attention to locations and to other attributes.
    Kwak HW; Egeth H
    Percept Psychophys; 1992 May; 51(5):455-64. PubMed ID: 1594435
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stimulus-response compatibility with pure and mixed mappings in a flight task environment.
    Yamaguchi M; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Appl; 2006 Dec; 12(4):207-22. PubMed ID: 17154770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Real-life motor training modifies spatial performance: the advantage of being drummers.
    Pellicano A; Iani C; Rubichi S; Ricciardelli P; Borghi AM; Nicoletti R
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(2):169-79. PubMed ID: 20518433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A further test of sequential-sampling models that account for payoff effects on response bias in perceptual decision tasks.
    Diederich A
    Percept Psychophys; 2008 Feb; 70(2):229-56. PubMed ID: 18372746
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Action-induced effects on perception depend neither on element-level nor on set-level similarity between stimulus and response sets.
    Wykowska A; Hommel B; Schubö A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2011 May; 73(4):1034-41. PubMed ID: 21472508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Attentional factors in the occurrence of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Verfaellie M; Bowers D; Heilman KM
    Neuropsychologia; 1988; 26(3):435-44. PubMed ID: 3374802
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.